BMJ open | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3013 / 33,987
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 14 jam yang lalu

BMJ open

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Pengindeksan
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Nama Singkat BMJ Open
Nama Singkatan bmj open
ISSN 2044-6055
Tujuan dan Ruang Lingkup
URL http://bmjopen.bmj.com
Petunjuk untuk Penulis

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (442 total)

2018
Life after the loss: protocol for a Danish longitudinal follow-up study unfolding life and grief after the death of a child during pregnancy from gestational week 14, during birth or in the first 4 weeks of life.
Hvidtjørn, Dorte;Prinds, Christina;Bliddal, Mette;Henriksen, Tine Brink;Cacciatore, Joanne;O'Connor, Maja;
Vol. 8 , No. 12 , pp. e024278
636 views DOI Abstract
2019
Differences between the Canadian military's Regular and Reserve Forces in perceived need for care, mental health services use and perceived sufficiency of care: a cross-sectional survey.
Boulos, David;Fikretoglu, Deniz;
Vol. 9 , No. 9 , pp. e028849
622 views DOI Abstract
2019
Recidivism, health and social functioning following release to the community of NSW prisoners with problematic drug use: study protocol of the population-based retrospective cohort study on the evaluation of the Connections Program.
Sullivan, Elizabeth;Ward, Stephen;Zeki, Reem;Wayland, Sarah;Sherwood, Juanita;Wang, Alex;Worner, Faye;Kendall, Sacha;Brown, James;Chang, Sungwon;
Vol. 9 , No. 7 , pp. e030546
618 views DOI Abstract
2018
Assessment tools for the measurement of the self-efficacy of drug users: protocol for a systematic review.
Vasconcelos, Selene Cordeiro;Frazão, Iracema da Silva;Sougey, Everton Botelho;Souza, Sandra Lopes de;Silva, Tatiana de Paula Santana da;Lima, Murilo Duarte da Costa;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. e019019
592 views DOI Abstract
2019
Protocol for a multisite randomised trial of Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Training Including Lower Extremity training for children with bilateral cerebral palsy: HABIT-ILE Australia.
Sakzewski, Leanne;Bleyenheuft, Yannick;Boyd, Roslyn N;Novak, Iona;Elliott, Catherine;Reedman, Sarah;Morgan, Cathy;Pannek, Kerstin;Fripp, Jurgen;Golland, Prue;Rowell, David;Chatfield, Mark;Ware, Robert Stuart;
Vol. 9 , No. 9 , pp. e032194
587 views DOI Abstract
2019
Contributing factors that influence medication errors in the prehospital paramedic environment: a mixed-method systematic review protocol.
Walker, Dennis;Moloney, Clint;SueSee, Brendan;Sharples, Renee;
Vol. 9 , No. 12 , pp. e034094
586 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evidence characterising skills, competencies and policies in advanced practice critical care nursing in Europe: a scoping review protocol.
Kaldan, Gudrun;Nordentoft, Sara;Herling, Suzanne Forsyth;Larsen, Anders;Thomsen, Thordis;Egerod, Ingrid;
Vol. 9 , No. 9 , pp. e031504
585 views DOI Abstract
2016
Association of eating behaviours with diurnal preference and rotating shift work in Japanese female nurses: a cross-sectional study.
Yoshizaki, Takahiro;Kawano, Yukari;Noguchi, Osamu;Onishi, Junko;Teramoto, Reiko;Sunami, Ayaka;Yokoyama, Yuri;Tada, Yuki;Hida, Azumi;Togo, Fumiharu;
Vol. 6 , No. 11 , pp. e011987
573 views DOI Abstract
2019
Relationship between breast feeding and motor development in children: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hernández Luengo, Monserrat;Álvarez-Bueno, Celia;Pozuelo-Carrascosa, Diana P;Berlanga-Macías, Carlos;Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente;Notario-Pacheco, Blanca;
Vol. 9 , No. 9 , pp. e029063
549 views DOI Abstract
2019
Examining satisfaction of older adult patients and their caregivers following traumatic injury: a cross-sectional study of three level I trauma centres.
Vogel, Rebecca;McGraw, Constance;Orlando, Alessandro;Bourg, Pamela;Dreiman, Chester;Peck, Laura;Tanner, Allen;Lynch, Neal;Bar-Or, David;
Vol. 9 , No. 11 , pp. e032374
547 views DOI Abstract
View All 442 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.