Indexed in Journament

BMJ open

ISSN 2044-6055· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
50.1 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #66 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
442 Articles
Scores higher than 99.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name BMJ Open
Abbreviated Name bmj open
ISSN 2044-6055
URL http://bmjopen.bmj.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 33.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 60.0 9.2
Diversity 74.5 25.9
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 6.4 7.8
Content Distribution 76.7 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (442)

2019
Differences between the Canadian military's Regular and Reserve Forces in perceived need for care, mental health services use and perceived sufficiency of care: a cross-sectional survey.
Boulos, David;Fikretoglu, Deniz;
Vol. 9 , No. 9 , pp. e028849
669 views DOI Abstract
2018
Life after the loss: protocol for a Danish longitudinal follow-up study unfolding life and grief after the death of a child during pregnancy from gestational week 14, during birth or in the first 4 weeks of life.
Hvidtjørn, Dorte;Prinds, Christina;Bliddal, Mette;Henriksen, Tine Brink;Cacciatore, Joanne;O'Connor, Maja;
Vol. 8 , No. 12 , pp. e024278
664 views DOI Abstract
2019
Recidivism, health and social functioning following release to the community of NSW prisoners with problematic drug use: study protocol of the population-based retrospective cohort study on the evaluation of the Connections Program.
Sullivan, Elizabeth;Ward, Stephen;Zeki, Reem;Wayland, Sarah;Sherwood, Juanita;Wang, Alex;Worner, Faye;Kendall, Sacha;Brown, James;Chang, Sungwon;
Vol. 9 , No. 7 , pp. e030546
641 views DOI Abstract
2018
Assessment tools for the measurement of the self-efficacy of drug users: protocol for a systematic review.
Vasconcelos, Selene Cordeiro;Frazão, Iracema da Silva;Sougey, Everton Botelho;Souza, Sandra Lopes de;Silva, Tatiana de Paula Santana da;Lima, Murilo Duarte da Costa;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. e019019
624 views DOI Abstract
2019
Protocol for a multisite randomised trial of Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Training Including Lower Extremity training for children with bilateral cerebral palsy: HABIT-ILE Australia.
Sakzewski, Leanne;Bleyenheuft, Yannick;Boyd, Roslyn N;Novak, Iona;Elliott, Catherine;Reedman, Sarah;Morgan, Cathy;Pannek, Kerstin;Fripp, Jurgen;Golland, Prue;Rowell, David;Chatfield, Mark;Ware, Robert Stuart;
Vol. 9 , No. 9 , pp. e032194
618 views DOI Abstract
2019
Contributing factors that influence medication errors in the prehospital paramedic environment: a mixed-method systematic review protocol.
Walker, Dennis;Moloney, Clint;SueSee, Brendan;Sharples, Renee;
Vol. 9 , No. 12 , pp. e034094
617 views DOI Abstract
2016
Association of eating behaviours with diurnal preference and rotating shift work in Japanese female nurses: a cross-sectional study.
Yoshizaki, Takahiro;Kawano, Yukari;Noguchi, Osamu;Onishi, Junko;Teramoto, Reiko;Sunami, Ayaka;Yokoyama, Yuri;Tada, Yuki;Hida, Azumi;Togo, Fumiharu;
Vol. 6 , No. 11 , pp. e011987
606 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evidence characterising skills, competencies and policies in advanced practice critical care nursing in Europe: a scoping review protocol.
Kaldan, Gudrun;Nordentoft, Sara;Herling, Suzanne Forsyth;Larsen, Anders;Thomsen, Thordis;Egerod, Ingrid;
Vol. 9 , No. 9 , pp. e031504
605 views DOI Abstract
2019
Examining satisfaction of older adult patients and their caregivers following traumatic injury: a cross-sectional study of three level I trauma centres.
Vogel, Rebecca;McGraw, Constance;Orlando, Alessandro;Bourg, Pamela;Dreiman, Chester;Peck, Laura;Tanner, Allen;Lynch, Neal;Bar-Or, David;
Vol. 9 , No. 11 , pp. e032374
597 views DOI Abstract
2019
Relationship between breast feeding and motor development in children: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hernández Luengo, Monserrat;Álvarez-Bueno, Celia;Pozuelo-Carrascosa, Diana P;Berlanga-Macías, Carlos;Martínez-Vizcaíno, Vicente;Notario-Pacheco, Blanca;
Vol. 9 , No. 9 , pp. e029063
578 views DOI Abstract
2025
Medication adherence and needs among patients with schizophrenia in China: a qualitative study
Xuping Li; Shuiyuan Xiao; Yajun Sun; Ying Zheng; Jiaju Huang; Ning Wei; Chun Mao; Shengjun Zhang; Yongyong Teng
24 views DOI Abstract
2024
Intersectional stigma and the non-communicable disease syndemic in the context of HIV: protocol for a multisite, observational study in the USA.
Friedman, M Reuel;Badri, Sheila;Bowleg, Lisa;Haberlen, Sabina A;Jones, Deborah L;Kempf, Mirjam-Colette;Konkle-Parker, Deborah;Kwait, Jenn;Martinson, Jeremy;Mimiaga, Matthew J;Plankey, Michael W;Stosor, Valentina;Tsai, Alexander C;Turan, Janet M;Ware, Deanna;Wu, Katherine;
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. e075368
105 views DOI Abstract
2024
Artificial intelligence driven malnutrition diagnostic model for patients with acute abdomen based on GLIM criteria: a cross-sectional research protocol.
Ma, Wei;Cai, Bin;Wang, Yu;Wang, Lu;Sun, Ming-Wei;Lu, Charles Damien;Jiang, Hua;
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. e077734
115 views DOI Abstract
2024
Identifying the top 10 research priorities for the school food system in the UK: a priority setting exercise.
Schliemann, Désirée;Spence, Suzanne;O'Kane, Niamh;Chiang, Cheng Choo;Olgacher, Dilara;McKinley, Michelle C;Woodside, Jayne V;, ;
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. e081400
111 views DOI Abstract
2023
Swedish multimodal cohort of patients with anxiety or depression treated with internet-delivered psychotherapy (MULTI-PSYCH)
Boberg, J.
Vol. 13 , pp. 0-0
26 views DOI
2023
Comparing the effects of mHealth application based on micro-learning method and face-to-face training on treatment adherence and perception in haemodialysis patients: a randomised clinical trial.
Torabi Khah, Mohsen;Farsi, Zahra;Sajadi, Seyedeh Azam;
Vol. 13 , No. 6 , pp. e071982
136 views DOI Abstract
2021
Scoping review protocol to understand the conceptualisation, implementation and practices of health promotion within the context of primary healthcare in Africa.
Nkangu, Miriam;Obegu, Pamela;Asahngwa, Constantine;Shiroya, Veronica;Gobina, Ronald;Agbaw-Ebai, Fleur Pembe;Keboa, Mark;Foretia, Denis;
Vol. 11 , No. 12 , pp. e049084
120 views DOI Abstract
2021
Staying ahead of the curve: Navigating changes and maintaining gains in patient safety culture - a mixed-methods study
El-Jardali, Fadi;Titi, Maher Abdelraheim;Baksh, Maram Mohammed;Zubairi, Beena;Abdalla, Rawia Ahmad Mustafa;Alsaif, Faisal Abdullah;Amer, Yasser S;Jamal, Diana;
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. -
136 views Abstract
2021
Instruments measuring the quality of life among people living with type 2 diabetes mellitus in India: a systematic review protocol
Demla, Chetna;Thomas, Anns;Jose, Jomol;Joshy, Angela L;Hrishikesh, M A;Rajendran, Ambigai;Parsekar, Shradha S;
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. -
32 views Abstract
2020
Socioeconomic inequalities in the prevalence of complex multimorbidity in a Norwegian population: findings from the cross-sectional HUNT Study
Vinjerui KH;Bjerkeset O;Bjorngaard JH;Krokstad S;Douglas KA;Sund ER;;
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. -
283 views Abstract
Journament Score
50.1/100 · Average
Ranked #66 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

50.1/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

33.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

74.5/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

76.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.