Indexed in Journament

anatomical sciences education

ISSN 1935-9780· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.8/100
Journament Score
#5,620
Journament Rank
26
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name anat sci educ
Abbreviated Name anat sci educ
ISSN 1935-9780
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/19359780

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (26)

2020
Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat (SWOT) Analysis of the Adaptations to Anatomical Education in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland in Response to the COIVD-19 Pandemic.
Longhurst, Georga J;Stone, Danya M;Dulohery, Kate;Scully, Deirdre;Campbell, Thomas;Smith, Claire F;
452 views DOI Abstract
2016
Online dissection audio-visual resources for human anatomy: Undergraduate medical students' usage and learning outcomes.
Choi-Lundberg, Derek L;Cuellar, William A;Williams, Anne-Marie M;
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. 545-554
430 views DOI Abstract
2020
Forced Disruption of Anatomy Education in Australia and New Zealand: An Acute Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic.
Pather, Nalini;Blyth, Phil;Chapman, Jamie A;Dayal, Manisha R;Flack, Natasha A M S;Fogg, Quentin A;Green, Rodney A;Hulme, Anneliese K;Johnson, Ian P;Meyer, Amanda J;Morley, John W;Shortland, Peter J;Štrkalj, Goran;Štrkalj, Mirjana;Valter, Krisztina;Webb, Alexandra L;Woodley, Stephanie J;Lazarus, Michelle D;
396 views DOI Abstract
E-learning, dual-task, and cognitive load: The anatomy of a failed experiment.
Van Nuland, Sonya E;Rogers, Kem A;
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 186-96
392 views DOI Abstract
2016
The anatomy of E-Learning tools: Does software usability influence learning outcomes?
Van Nuland, Sonya E;Rogers, Kem A;
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 378-90
385 views DOI Abstract
2015
Implementation of an education-focused PhD program in anatomy and cell biology at Indiana University: Lessons learned and future challenges
Brokaw, J.
Vol. 8 , pp. 258-265
377 views DOI
Is three-dimensional videography the cutting edge of surgical skill acquisition?
Roach, Victoria A;Brandt, Michael G;Moore, Corey C;Wilson, Timothy D;
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 138-45
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
Game-Based Learning in Virtual Worlds: A Multiuser Online Game for Medical Undergraduate Radiology Education within Second Life.
Lorenzo-Alvarez, Rocio;Rudolphi-Solero, Teodoro;Ruiz-Gomez, Miguel J;Sendra-Portero, Francisco;
365 views DOI Abstract
2016
Social media and anatomy education: Using twitter to enhance the student learning experience in anatomy.
Hennessy, Catherine M;Kirkpatrick, Emma;Smith, Claire F;Border, Scott;
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. 505-515
365 views DOI Abstract
2017
The skeletons in our closet: E-learning tools and what happens when one side does not fit all.
Van Nuland, Sonya E;Rogers, Kem A;
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. 570-588
360 views DOI Abstract
2020
Improvement in Student Performance and Perceptions through a Flipped Anatomy Classroom: Shifting from Passive Traditional to Active Blended Learning.
El Sadik, Abir;Al Abdulmonem, Waleed;
314 views DOI Abstract
2020
Medical Students' Perceptions and an Anatomy Teacher's Personal Experience Using an e-Learning Platform for Tutorials During the Covid-19 Crisis.
Srinivasan, Dinesh Kumar;
358 views DOI Abstract
2020
Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat (SWOT) Analysis of the Adaptations to Anatomical Education in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland in Response to the COIVD-19 Pandemic.
Longhurst, Georga J;Stone, Danya M;Dulohery, Kate;Scully, Deirdre;Campbell, Thomas;Smith, Claire F;
452 views DOI Abstract
2020
Forced Disruption of Anatomy Education in Australia and New Zealand: An Acute Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic.
Pather, Nalini;Blyth, Phil;Chapman, Jamie A;Dayal, Manisha R;Flack, Natasha A M S;Fogg, Quentin A;Green, Rodney A;Hulme, Anneliese K;Johnson, Ian P;Meyer, Amanda J;Morley, John W;Shortland, Peter J;Štrkalj, Goran;Štrkalj, Mirjana;Valter, Krisztina;Webb, Alexandra L;Woodley, Stephanie J;Lazarus, Michelle D;
396 views DOI Abstract
2020
Stimulating Intrinsic Motivation in Millennial Students: A New Generation, a New Approach
Chaudhuri, J.D.
Vol. 13 , pp. 250-271
217 views DOI
2019
How Can We Show You, If You Can't See It? Trialing the Use of an Interactive Three-Dimensional Micro-CT Model in Medical Education
O'Rourke, J.
, pp. 0-0
174 views DOI
2019
Game-Based Learning in Virtual Worlds: A Multiuser Online Game for Medical Undergraduate Radiology Education within Second Life.
Lorenzo-Alvarez, Rocio;Rudolphi-Solero, Teodoro;Ruiz-Gomez, Miguel J;Sendra-Portero, Francisco;
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cadaveric Dissection in Relation to Problem-Based Learning Case Sequencing: A Report of Medical Student Musculoskeletal Examination Performances and Self-Confidence
Thompson, K.
Vol. 12 , pp. 619-626
254 views DOI
2019
The Quality and Readability of English Wikipedia Anatomy Articles.
Suwannakhan, Athikhun;Casanova-Martínez, Daniel;Yurasakpong, Laphatrada;Montriwat, Punchalee;Meemon, Krai;Limpanuparb, Taweetham;
301 views DOI Abstract
2017
organizational and technological solutions of the restoration of covering constructions of stone orthodox churches
;LYKHOHRAI V. V.
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 127-135
29 views Abstract
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.