anatomical sciences education | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1431 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

anatomical sciences education

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name anat sci educ
Abbreviated Name anat sci educ
ISSN 1935-9780
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/19359780
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (26 total)

2020
Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat (SWOT) Analysis of the Adaptations to Anatomical Education in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland in Response to the COIVD-19 Pandemic.
Longhurst, Georga J;Stone, Danya M;Dulohery, Kate;Scully, Deirdre;Campbell, Thomas;Smith, Claire F;
395 views DOI Abstract
2016
Online dissection audio-visual resources for human anatomy: Undergraduate medical students' usage and learning outcomes.
Choi-Lundberg, Derek L;Cuellar, William A;Williams, Anne-Marie M;
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. 545-554
388 views DOI Abstract
2016
The anatomy of E-Learning tools: Does software usability influence learning outcomes?
Van Nuland, Sonya E;Rogers, Kem A;
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 378-90
358 views DOI Abstract
2020
Forced Disruption of Anatomy Education in Australia and New Zealand: An Acute Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic.
Pather, Nalini;Blyth, Phil;Chapman, Jamie A;Dayal, Manisha R;Flack, Natasha A M S;Fogg, Quentin A;Green, Rodney A;Hulme, Anneliese K;Johnson, Ian P;Meyer, Amanda J;Morley, John W;Shortland, Peter J;Štrkalj, Goran;Štrkalj, Mirjana;Valter, Krisztina;Webb, Alexandra L;Woodley, Stephanie J;Lazarus, Michelle D;
353 views DOI Abstract
E-learning, dual-task, and cognitive load: The anatomy of a failed experiment.
Van Nuland, Sonya E;Rogers, Kem A;
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 186-96
353 views DOI Abstract
2015
Implementation of an education-focused PhD program in anatomy and cell biology at Indiana University: Lessons learned and future challenges
Brokaw, J.
Vol. 8 , pp. 258-265
351 views DOI
Is three-dimensional videography the cutting edge of surgical skill acquisition?
Roach, Victoria A;Brandt, Michael G;Moore, Corey C;Wilson, Timothy D;
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 138-45
350 views DOI Abstract
2016
Social media and anatomy education: Using twitter to enhance the student learning experience in anatomy.
Hennessy, Catherine M;Kirkpatrick, Emma;Smith, Claire F;Border, Scott;
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. 505-515
339 views DOI Abstract
2019
Game-Based Learning in Virtual Worlds: A Multiuser Online Game for Medical Undergraduate Radiology Education within Second Life.
Lorenzo-Alvarez, Rocio;Rudolphi-Solero, Teodoro;Ruiz-Gomez, Miguel J;Sendra-Portero, Francisco;
336 views DOI Abstract
2020
Medical Students' Perceptions and an Anatomy Teacher's Personal Experience Using an e-Learning Platform for Tutorials During the Covid-19 Crisis.
Srinivasan, Dinesh Kumar;
328 views DOI Abstract
View All 26 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.