Indexed in Journament

social cognitive and affective neuroscience

ISSN 1749-5024· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.9/100
Journament Score
#6,564
Journament Rank
19
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name soc cogn affect neurosci
Abbreviated Name soc cogn affect neurosci
ISSN 1749-5024
URL http://scan.oxfordjournals.org

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim sci soc

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (19)

2019
Being the chosen one: social inclusion modulates decisions in the ultimatum game. An ERP study.
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 141-149
392 views DOI Abstract
2012
The association between financial hardship and amygdala and hippocampal volumes: results from the PATH through life project.
Vol. 7 , No. 5 , pp. 548-56
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Social support modulates the neural correlates underlying social exclusion.
Vol. 14 , No. 6 , pp. 633-643
351 views DOI Abstract
2016
competition and cooperation with virtual players in an exergame
Vol. 2 , pp. e92-
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
Neural substrates for anticipation and consumption of social and monetary incentives in depression.
Vol. 14 , No. 8 , pp. 815-826
338 views DOI Abstract
2015
Social identity modifies face perception: an ERP study of social categorization.
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. 672-9
309 views DOI Abstract
2016
toward physiological indices of emotional state driving future ebook interactivity
Vol. 2 , pp. e60-
295 views DOI Abstract
2016
bioassay templates for the semantic web
Vol. 2 , pp. e61-
265 views DOI Abstract
2015
expected usability is not a valid indicator of experienced usability
Vol. 1 , pp. e19-
240 views DOI Abstract
2019
Neural substrates for anticipation and consumption of social and monetary incentives in depression.
Vol. 14 , No. 8 , pp. 815-826
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
Social support modulates the neural correlates underlying social exclusion.
Vol. 14 , No. 6 , pp. 633-643
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Being the chosen one: social inclusion modulates decisions in the ultimatum game. An ERP study.
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 141-149
392 views DOI Abstract
2017
sympy: symbolic computing in python
Vol. 3 , pp. e103-
217 views DOI Abstract
2017
exploring twitter communication dynamics with evolving community analysis
Vol. 3 , pp. e107-
143 views DOI Abstract
2017
isolated guitar transcription using a deep belief network
Vol. 3 , pp. e109-
160 views DOI Abstract
2016
monophy: a simple r package to find and visualize monophyly issues
Vol. 2 , pp. e56-
159 views DOI Abstract
2016
fuzzy based binary feature profiling for modus operandi analysis
Vol. 2 , pp. e65-
18 views DOI Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.