Indexed in Journament

geophysical journal international

ISSN 0956-540X· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,948 of 19,457 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
215 Articles
Scores higher than 28.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name geophysical journal international
Abbreviated Name geophysical journal international
ISSN 0956-540X
URL http://gji.oxfordjournals.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.0 29.9
Accessibility 35.0 19.8
Timeliness 100.0 40.7
Diversity 30.0 30.0
Innovation 40.0 37.6
Community Impact 32.0 27.6
Content Distribution 12.7 84.9
Content Quality — 54.2
Ethics & Transparency — 39.5
Editorial Standards — 32.5
Publication Regularity — 51.6
Geographic Reach — 30.0

Publications Per Year

Articles (215)

2019
Bayesian simultaneous inversion for local earthquake hypocentres and 1-D velocity structure using minimum prior knowledge
Ryberg, T.
Vol. 218 , pp. 840-854
223 views DOI
2022
Mantle Q structure from S, SS, SSS and SSSS amplitude measurements
Zhu, M.
Vol. 231 , pp. 703-716
175 views DOI
1999
Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm—I. Searching a parameter space
Malcolm Sambridge
38 views DOI Abstract
2010
International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the eleventh generation
Christopher C. Finlay, S. Maus, Ciarán Beggan, T. N. Bondar, Aude Chambodut, Tatiana A. Chernova, Arnaud Chulliat, V. P. Golovkov, Brian Hamilton, Mohamed Hamoudi, R. Holme, Gauthier Hulot, Weijia Kuang, B. Langlais, Vincent Lesur, F. J. Lowes, H. Lühr, S. Macmillan, Mioara Mandéa, Scott P McLean, C. Manoj, M. Menvielle, Ingo Michaelis, Nils Olsen, Jan Rauberg, M. Rother, Terence J. Sabaka, Andrew Tangborn, Lars Tøffner‐Clausen, Erwan Thébault, Alan Thomson, I. Wardinski, Zigang Wei, T. I. Zvereva
13 views DOI Abstract
2010
Geologically current plate motions
Charles DeMets, Richard G. Gordon, Donald F. Argus
13 views DOI Abstract
2010
S40RTS: a degree-40 shear-velocity model for the mantle from new Rayleigh wave dispersion, teleseismic traveltime and normal-mode splitting function measurements
Jeroen Ritsema, Arwen Deuss, H. J. van Heijst, John Woodhouse
12 views DOI Abstract
2004
Seismic tomography, adjoint methods, time reversal and banana-doughnut kernels
Jeroen Tromp, Carl Tape, Qinya Liu
12 views DOI Abstract
2012
Computational recipes for electromagnetic inverse problems
G. D. Egbert, Anna Kelbert
10 views DOI Abstract
2018
PhaseNet: A Deep-Neural-Network-Based Seismic Arrival Time Picking Method
Weiqiang Zhu, Gregory C. Beroza
9 views DOI Abstract
2013
Geophysical Journal International
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
Effects of non-Newtonian pore-fluid rheology on frequency-dependent wave dispersion and attenuation in porous rocks
Baohai Wu, Jinghuai Gao
DOI Abstract
2026
Contrasting mechanisms of present-day vertical deformation along the northeastern Tibetan Plateau: Insights from 3-D viscoelastic modeling
Cheng Yang, Yujiang Li, Yujiang Li, Yuhang Li, Yuhang Li, Huiping Zhang, Lei Liu
DOI Abstract
2026
An Alternative Method to Moho Topography Recovery from GOCE Gravity Gradients and Its Application in the Tibetan Plateau
Chuang Xu, Juntao Liang, Jiakuan Wan, Lilu Cui
DOI Abstract
2026
Lithospheric boundaries of the São Francisco paleocontinental block revealed by multiple frequency seismic tomography
Guilherme Manno Penna Crepaldi Affonso, Marcelo Peres Rocha, Tiago Jalowitzki, Fernando Flecha Alkmim, Reinhardt A. Fuck, Aderson Farias do Nascimento, Jordi Julià, Karin Sigloch, Guust Nolet, Eduardo Alexandre Santos de Menezes, Estevão Tadeu, Giuliano Sant’Anna Marotta
DOI Abstract
2026
Ambient Noise Spectroscopy for efficient monitoring of unbiased seismic velocity changes
Christoph Sens‐Schönfelder
DOI Abstract
2026
Advantages of high-resolution seismic velocity monitoring using coda wave interferometry with an accurately controlled seismic source
Chen Feng, Toshiki Watanabe, Ryoya Ikuta, Koshun Yamaoka, Shuhei Tsuji
DOI Abstract
2026
Effects of Pore Structure Evolution on Elastic Wave Velocities and Permeability of Tight Sandstones under Pressure
Xi Qing, 忍 宝徳, Genyang Tang, Jun Yu, Shangxu Wang, Guohua Wei, MinLong Li
DOI Abstract
2026
Paleo- and Neo-Tethyan subducted slabs beneath the Eastern Mediterranean region
Douwe J.J. van Hinsbergen, Derya Gürer, Douwe G. van der Meer, Wim Spakman
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Equivalent-current inversion to account for infrastructure-related effects in semi-airborne electromagnetic data
H Treppke, M Becken, R Rochlitz
DOI Abstract
2026
A Novel Three-Observation-Link Satellite Formation for Enhanced Temporal Gravity Field Recovery
Tiantian Qing, Hao Zhou, Yaozong Li, Shuyun Zheng, Mingyang Xia, Zhicai Luo, Zebing Zhou
DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,948 of 19,457 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

12.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.