Indexed in Journament

International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being

ISSN 1748-2631· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.4/100
Journament Score
#7,579
Journament Rank
57
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being
Abbreviated Name int j qual stud health well-being
ISSN 1748-2631
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/zqhw20/current

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim soc

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (57)

2020
To take charge of one's life - group-based education for patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care - a lifeworld approach.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 1726856
473 views DOI Abstract
2020
Social isolation and exclusion: the parents' experience of caring for children with rare neurodevelopmental disorders.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 1725362
427 views DOI Abstract
2018
Lived experience of infertility among Hong Kong Chinese women.
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 1554023
419 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient pathways as social drama: a qualitative study of cancer trajectories from the patient's perspective.
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 1639461
416 views DOI Abstract
2018
A challenging entanglement: health care providers' perspectives on caring for ill and injured tourists on Cozumel Island, Mexico.
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 1479583
407 views DOI Abstract
2019
Lost in an unknown terrain: a phenomenological contribution to the understanding of existential concerns as experienced by young women in Sweden.
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 1658843
405 views DOI Abstract
2007
2013
piriápolis: pionera planificación urbana en américa del sur
Vol. 16 , No. 28 , pp. -
380 views Abstract
2019
Expanding knowledge and roles for authority and practice boundaries of Emergency Department nurses: a grounded theory study.
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 1563429
366 views DOI Abstract
2014
ciudad de panamá
Vol. 17 , No. 29 , pp. -
363 views Abstract
2020
To take charge of one's life - group-based education for patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care - a lifeworld approach.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 1726856
473 views DOI Abstract
2020
Social isolation and exclusion: the parents' experience of caring for children with rare neurodevelopmental disorders.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 1725362
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
divergencias y contradicciones en la planificación sustentable del periurbano rural metropolitano de valparaíso. caso reserva de la biosfera la campana-peñuelas, chile central
Vol. 22 , No. 39 , pp. -
186 views DOI Abstract
2019
Lost in an unknown terrain: a phenomenological contribution to the understanding of existential concerns as experienced by young women in Sweden.
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 1658843
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient pathways as social drama: a qualitative study of cancer trajectories from the patient's perspective.
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 1639461
416 views DOI Abstract
2019
Expanding knowledge and roles for authority and practice boundaries of Emergency Department nurses: a grounded theory study.
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 1563429
366 views DOI Abstract
2018
2018
A challenging entanglement: health care providers' perspectives on caring for ill and injured tourists on Cozumel Island, Mexico.
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 1479583
407 views DOI Abstract
2018
Lived experience of infertility among Hong Kong Chinese women.
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 1554023
419 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
42
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

41.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.