Indexed in Journament

ensaio pesquisa em educação em ciências

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
24.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,948 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
234 Articles
Scores higher than 4.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name ensaio pesquisa em educação em ciências
Abbreviated Name ensaio pesquisa em educação em ciências

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 6.0
Community Impact 5.0
Content Distribution 69.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for ensaio pesquisa em educação em ciências
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 6.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.0 13.4
Content Distribution 69.4 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (234)

2020
photoacoustic imaging to localize indeterminate pulmonary nodules: a preclinical study.
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. e0231488-
537 views DOI Abstract
2019
temporal trends in prevalence and antithrombotic treatment among asians with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a nationwide korean population-based study.
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. e0209593-
521 views DOI Abstract
2018
oral mucosa tissue gene expression profiling before, during, and after radiation therapy for tonsil squamous cell carcinoma.
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. e0190709-
498 views DOI Abstract
2015
the financial impact of the 'zero-markup policy for essential drugs' on patients in county hospitals in western rural china.
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. e0121630-
459 views DOI Abstract
2019
involvement of extracellular vesicles in the macrophage-tumor cell communication in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Vol. 14 , No. 11 , pp. e0224710-
433 views DOI Abstract
2019
tuberculosis treatment outcome and its associated factors among people living with hiv and aids in fako division of cameroon.
Vol. 14 , No. 7 , pp. e0218800-
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
hyperkalemia and renin-angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitor therapy in chronic kidney disease: a general practice-based, observational study.
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. e0213192-
399 views DOI Abstract
2013
association of body iron status with the risk of premature acute myocardial infarction in a pakistani population.
Vol. 8 , No. 6 , pp. e67981-
399 views DOI Abstract
2020
towards universal coverage for nutrition services in children under five years-a descriptive analysis of the capacity of level one hospitals to provide nutrition services in five provinces of zambia.
Vol. 15 , No. 5 , pp. e0232663-
384 views DOI Abstract
2020
towards universal coverage for nutrition services in children under five years-a descriptive analysis of the capacity of level one hospitals to provide nutrition services in five provinces of zambia.
Vol. 15 , No. 5 , pp. e0232663-
384 views DOI Abstract
2020
an evaluation study of caregiver perceptions of the ontario's health links program.
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. e0229579-
174 views DOI Abstract
2020
complexity theory for the modern chinese economy from an information entropy perspective: modeling of economic efficiency and growth potential.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. e0227206-
163 views DOI Abstract
2020
effect of long-term cold storage on trehalose metabolism of pre-wintering harmonia axyridis adults and changes in morphological diversity before and after wintering.
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. e0230435-
180 views DOI Abstract
2020
omeprazole use and risk of chronic kidney disease evolution.
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. e0229344-
184 views DOI Abstract
2020
pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor reduces multi-organ injury caused by gut ischemia/reperfusion in mice.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. e0227059-
154 views DOI Abstract
2020
drivers of the opioid crisis: an appraisal of financial conflicts of interest in clinical practice guideline panels at the peak of opioid prescribing.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. e0227045-
247 views DOI Abstract
2020
valuing natural habitats for enhancing coastal resilience: wetlands reduce property damage from storm surge and sea level rise.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. e0226275-
195 views DOI Abstract
2020
real word evidence on rituximab utilization: combining administrative and hospital-pharmacy data.
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. e0229973-
135 views DOI Abstract
2020
sociodemographic and health service organizational factors associated with the choice of the private versus public sector for specialty visits: evidence from a national survey in italy.
Vol. 15 , No. 5 , pp. e0232827-
177 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
24.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,948 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

24.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

6.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.