international journal of infectious diseases | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1822 / 33,968
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

international journal of infectious diseases

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name international journal of infectious diseases
Abbreviated Name international journal of infectious diseases
ISSN 1201-9712
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-infectious-diseases
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (27 total)

2014
HIV–malaria coinfection: Anti-malaria therapy in people living with HIV/AIDS in Owerri, Nigeria
Ukaga, C.N.;
Vol. 21 , No. S1 , pp. 121-
369 views
2020
Estimation of the reproductive number of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and the probable outbreak size on the Diamond Princess cruise ship: A data-driven analysis
Zhang, S.
Vol. 93 , pp. 201-204
353 views DOI
2017
Learning from epidemiological, clinical, and immunological studies on Mycobacterium africanum for improving current understanding of host–pathogen interactions, and for the development and evaluation of diagnostics, host-directed therapies, and vaccines for tuberculosis
Zumla, Alimuddin;Otchere, Isaac Darko;Mensah, Gloria Ivy;Asante-Poku, Adwoa;Gehre, Florian;Maeurer, Markus;Bates, Matthew;Mwaba, Peter;Ntoumi, Francine;Yeboah-Manu, Dorothy;
Vol. 56 , No. C , pp. 126-129
331 views Abstract
2020
The prominence of asymptomatic superspreaders in transmission mean universal face masking should be part of COVID-19 de-escalation strategies
Kenyon, Chris;
Vol. 97 , pp. 21-22
329 views
2014
Sero-epidemiology of major blood-borne infections among first time blood donors in Edea, Cameroon
Nansseu, N.J.R.;Noubiap, N.J.J.;
Vol. 21 , No. S1 , pp. 9-
325 views
2013
Sero-epidemiology of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B and C viruses, and syphilis infections among first-time blood donors in Edéa, Cameroon
Noubiap, J.
Vol. 17 , pp. 0-0
323 views DOI
2014
The role of candidate miRNAs in T Cell response during acute pulmonary tuberculosis in Kumasi, Ghana
Awuah, A. Afum-Adjei;Ueberberg, B.;Owusu-Dabo, E.;Jacobson, M.;
Vol. 21 , No. S1 , pp. 308-
322 views
2014
Hepatitis B vaccine knowledge and uptake among medical students in Cameroon
Nansseu, N.J.R.;Noubiap, N.J.J.;
Vol. 21 , No. S1 , pp. 448-449
318 views
2020
A conceptual model for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in Wuhan, China with individual reaction and governmental action
Lin, Q.
Vol. 93 , pp. 211-216
274 views DOI
2014
Detection of dengue virus in ten minutes using reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification assay
Wahed, A. Abd El;Patel, P.;Faye, O.;Heidenreich, D.;Sall, A.A.;Hufert, F.T.;Weidmann, M.;
Vol. 21 , No. S1 , pp. 21-
265 views
View All 27 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.