journal of personality and social psychology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#513 / 33,891
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated hace 28 minutos

journal of personality and social psychology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexaciones
scopus ncbi ulakbim soc
Nombre Corto j pers soc psychol
Nombre Abreviado j pers soc psychol
ISSN 1939-1315
Objetivo y Alcance
URL
Instrucciones para Autores

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (53 total)

2018
How you behave in school predicts life success above and beyond family background, broad traits, and cognitive ability.
Spengler, Marion;Damian, Rodica Ioana;Roberts, Brent W;
Vol. 114 , No. 4 , pp. 620-636
498 views DOI Abstract
2020
What breeds conspiracy antisemitism? The role of political uncontrollability and uncertainty in the belief in Jewish conspiracy.
Kofta, Mirosław;Soral, Wiktor;Bilewicz, Michał;
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Correction: The longitudinal links of personality traits, values, and well-being and self- esteem: A five-wave study of a nationally representative sample [Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Advance online publication, (2018)] http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000212
Fetvadjiev, V.
Vol. 117 , pp. 337
359 views DOI
2019
Twice-told tales: Self-repetition decreases observer assessments of performer authenticity.
Gershon, Rachel;Smith, Rosanna K;
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
How does it feel to be treated like an object? Direct and indirect effects of exposure to sexual objectification on women's emotions in daily life.
Koval, Peter;Holland, Elise;Zyphur, Michael J;Stratemeyer, Michelle;Knight, Jennifer Makovec;Bailen, Natasha H;Thompson, Renee J;Roberts, Tomi-Ann;Haslam, Nick;
Vol. 116 , No. 6 , pp. 885-898
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Personality structure in east and west Africa: Lexical studies of personality in Maa and Supyire-Senufo.
Thalmayer, Amber Gayle;Saucier, Gerard;Ole-Kotikash, Leonard;Payne, Doris;
320 views DOI Abstract
2019
"A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition": Correction to Fiske et al. (2002).
Fiske, Susan T;Cuddy, Amy J;Peter, Glick;Xu, Jun;
314 views DOI Abstract
2019
Intergroup contact, social dominance, and environmental concern: A test of the cognitive-liberalization hypothesis.
Meleady, Rose;Crisp, Richard J;Dhont, Kristof;Hopthrow, Tim;Turner, Rhiannon N;
308 views DOI Abstract
2020
From variability to vulnerability: People exposed to greater variability judge wrongdoers more harshly.
Ding, Yu;Savani, Krishna;
280 views DOI Abstract
2019
The commonness fallacy: Commonly chosen options have less choice appeal than people think.
Reit, Emily S;Critcher, Clayton R;
264 views DOI Abstract
View All 53 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.