Indexed in Journament

journal of personality and social psychology

ISSN 1939-1315· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #9,801 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
53 Articles
Scores higher than 66.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j pers soc psychol
Abbreviated Name j pers soc psychol
ISSN 1939-1315
URL http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/psp

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 60.0 19.2
Diversity 37.0 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 3.6 13.4
Content Distribution 44.1 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (53)

2018
How you behave in school predicts life success above and beyond family background, broad traits, and cognitive ability.
Spengler, Marion;Damian, Rodica Ioana;Roberts, Brent W;
Vol. 114 , No. 4 , pp. 620-636
588 views DOI Abstract
2020
What breeds conspiracy antisemitism? The role of political uncontrollability and uncertainty in the belief in Jewish conspiracy.
Kofta, Mirosław;Soral, Wiktor;Bilewicz, Michał;
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
Twice-told tales: Self-repetition decreases observer assessments of performer authenticity.
Gershon, Rachel;Smith, Rosanna K;
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Correction: The longitudinal links of personality traits, values, and well-being and self- esteem: A five-wave study of a nationally representative sample [Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Advance online publication, (2018)] http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000212
Fetvadjiev, V.
Vol. 117 , pp. 337
409 views DOI
2019
How does it feel to be treated like an object? Direct and indirect effects of exposure to sexual objectification on women's emotions in daily life.
Koval, Peter;Holland, Elise;Zyphur, Michael J;Stratemeyer, Michelle;Knight, Jennifer Makovec;Bailen, Natasha H;Thompson, Renee J;Roberts, Tomi-Ann;Haslam, Nick;
Vol. 116 , No. 6 , pp. 885-898
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Personality structure in east and west Africa: Lexical studies of personality in Maa and Supyire-Senufo.
Thalmayer, Amber Gayle;Saucier, Gerard;Ole-Kotikash, Leonard;Payne, Doris;
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Intergroup contact, social dominance, and environmental concern: A test of the cognitive-liberalization hypothesis.
Meleady, Rose;Crisp, Richard J;Dhont, Kristof;Hopthrow, Tim;Turner, Rhiannon N;
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
"A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition": Correction to Fiske et al. (2002).
Fiske, Susan T;Cuddy, Amy J;Peter, Glick;Xu, Jun;
386 views DOI Abstract
2020
From variability to vulnerability: People exposed to greater variability judge wrongdoers more harshly.
Ding, Yu;Savani, Krishna;
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
The commonness fallacy: Commonly chosen options have less choice appeal than people think.
Reit, Emily S;Critcher, Clayton R;
313 views DOI Abstract
2025
Lifestyle polarization on a college campus: Do liberals and conservatives behave differently in everyday life?
Talaifar, Sanaz; Jordan, Diana; Gosling, Samuel D; Harari, Gabriella M
59 views DOI Abstract
2020
From variability to vulnerability: People exposed to greater variability judge wrongdoers more harshly.
Ding, Yu;Savani, Krishna;
336 views DOI Abstract
2020
What breeds conspiracy antisemitism? The role of political uncontrollability and uncertainty in the belief in Jewish conspiracy.
Kofta, Mirosław;Soral, Wiktor;Bilewicz, Michał;
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
Determining our destiny: Do restrictions to collective autonomy fuel collective action?
Kachanoff, Frank J;Kteily, Nour S;Khullar, Thomas H;Park, Hyun Joon;Taylor, Donald M;
246 views DOI Abstract
2019
How does it feel to be treated like an object? Direct and indirect effects of exposure to sexual objectification on women's emotions in daily life.
Koval, Peter;Holland, Elise;Zyphur, Michael J;Stratemeyer, Michelle;Knight, Jennifer Makovec;Bailen, Natasha H;Thompson, Renee J;Roberts, Tomi-Ann;Haslam, Nick;
Vol. 116 , No. 6 , pp. 885-898
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Personality structure in east and west Africa: Lexical studies of personality in Maa and Supyire-Senufo.
Thalmayer, Amber Gayle;Saucier, Gerard;Ole-Kotikash, Leonard;Payne, Doris;
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Twice-told tales: Self-repetition decreases observer assessments of performer authenticity.
Gershon, Rachel;Smith, Rosanna K;
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
The commonness fallacy: Commonly chosen options have less choice appeal than people think.
Reit, Emily S;Critcher, Clayton R;
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Genetic and environmental variation in political orientation in adolescence and early adulthood: A Nuclear Twin Family analysis.
Hufer, Anke;Kornadt, Anna Elena;Kandler, Christian;Riemann, Rainer;
270 views DOI Abstract
2019
Correction: The longitudinal links of personality traits, values, and well-being and self- esteem: A five-wave study of a nationally representative sample [Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Advance online publication, (2018)] http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000212
Fetvadjiev, V.
Vol. 117 , pp. 337
409 views DOI
Journament Score
38.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #9,801 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

37.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

44.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.