Indexed in Journament

journal of experimental child psychology

ISSN 1096-0457· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #22,053 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
79 Articles
Scores higher than 24.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

ชื่อย่อ j exp child psychol
ชื่อตัวย่อ j exp child psychol
ISSN 1096-0457
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-experimental-child-psychology

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.9
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 64.5
Community Impact 5.0
Content Distribution 54.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of experimental child psychology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 64.5 31.2
Community Impact 5.0 13.4
Content Distribution 54.4 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (79)

2019
Using the N400 event-related potential to study word learning from context in children from low- and higher-socioeconomic status homes.
Vol. 191 , pp. 104758
553 views DOI Abstract
2009
oral midazolam premedication for children undergoing general anaesthesia for dental care
Vol. 2009 , pp. -
526 views DOI Abstract
2017
high prevalence of undernutrition among children in gondar town, northwest ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
517 views DOI Abstract
2019
Under the influence of the environment: Children's responding invigorated and biased by predictive cues.
Vol. 191 , pp. 104741
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cognate facilitation in Frisian-Dutch bilingual children's sentence reading: An eye-tracking study.
Vol. 189 , pp. 104699
452 views DOI Abstract
2019
2015
high dose dexmedetomidine: effective as a sole agent sedation for children undergoing mri
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
408 views DOI Abstract
2019
What does Mickey Mouse know about food? Children's trust in favorite characters versus experts.
Vol. 187 , pp. 104647
346 views DOI Abstract
2020
When correlation equals causation: A behavioral and computational account of second-order correlation learning in children.
Vol. 202 , pp. 105008
233 views DOI Abstract
2020
The development of social comparisons and sharing behavior across 12 countries.
Vol. 192 , pp. 104778
254 views DOI Abstract
2019
Using the N400 event-related potential to study word learning from context in children from low- and higher-socioeconomic status homes.
Vol. 191 , pp. 104758
553 views DOI Abstract
2019
Under the influence of the environment: Children's responding invigorated and biased by predictive cues.
Vol. 191 , pp. 104741
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
An eye-tracking study of selective trust development in children with and without autism spectrum disorder.
Vol. 189 , pp. 104697
312 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
30.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #22,053 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

30.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

64.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

54.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.