Indexed in Journament

tsinghua science and technology

ISSN 1007-0214· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,572 of 29,186 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
18 Articles
Scores higher than 60.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name tsinghua science and technology
Abbreviated Name tsinghua science and technology
ISSN 1007-0214

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.2 30.1
Accessibility 15.0 18.5
Timeliness 50.0 22.4
Diversity 30.0 29.3
Innovation 40.0 32.1
Community Impact 32.0 15.2
Content Distribution 70.0 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

2020
Context-aware social media user sentiment analysis
Liu, B.
Vol. 25 , pp. 528-541
214 views DOI
2020
A time-aware dynamic service quality prediction approach for services
Jin, Y.
Vol. 25 , pp. 227-238
105 views DOI
2020
Optimization of quantum computing models inspired by D-wave quantum annealing
Wang, B.
Vol. 25 , pp. 508-515
169 views DOI
2020
Collision avoidance strategy supported by LTE-V-based vehicle automation and communication systems for car following
Li, J.
Vol. 25 , pp. 127-139
242 views DOI
2020
Application specified soft-error failure rate analysis using sequential equivalence checking techniques
Li, T.
Vol. 25 , pp. 103-116
57 views DOI
2020
Software vulnerabilities overview: A descriptive study
Sánchez, M.
Vol. 25 , pp. 270-280
132 views DOI
2020
Towards connecting discrete mathematics and software engineering
Li, T.
Vol. 25 , pp. 325-335
165 views DOI
2020
5Ws of green and sustainable software
Calero, C.
Vol. 25 , pp. 401-414
12 views DOI
2020
Smart attendance system based on frequency distribution algorithm with passive RFID tags
Miao, Q.
Vol. 25 , pp. 217-226
291 views DOI
2020
Propagation history ranking in social networks: A causality-based approach
Wang, Z.
Vol. 25 , pp. 161-179
283 views DOI
Journament Score
38.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,572 of 29,186 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.