information (japan) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1937 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

information (japan)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name information (japan)
Abbreviated Name information (japan)
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (9 total)

2020
syngas production improvement of sugarcane bagasse conversion using an electromagnetic modified vacuum pyrolysis reactor
;Muhammad Djoni Bustan;Sri Haryati;Fitri Hadiah;Selpiana Selpiana;Adri Huda
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 252-
284 views DOI Abstract
2020
a novel method to optimize autologous adipose tissue recovery with extracellular matrix preservation
;Ilaria Roato;Federico Mussano;Simone Reano;Filippo Boriani;Andrea Margara;Riccardo Ferracini;Ezio Adriani;Omar Sabry;Mauro Fiorini;Paolo Fattori
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 88-
283 views DOI Abstract
2016
Differences in budgetary participation in view of assessment of corporate governance, sector, and the experience of managers in public SOE in Indonesia
Purnamasari, D.
Vol. 19 , pp. 2527-2532
262 views
2020
sulfur, phosphorus and metals in the stoichiometric estimation of biomethane and biohydrogen yields
;Yehor Pererva;Charles D. Miler;Ronald C. Sims
Vol. 8 , No. 714 , pp. 714-
247 views DOI Abstract
2020
comparing composition control structures for kaibel distillation columns
;Yang Yuan;Kejin Huang;Haisheng Chen;Xing Qian;Lijing Zang;Liang Zhang;Shaofeng Wang
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 218-
238 views DOI Abstract
2020
application of computational intelligence in describing the drying kinetics of persimmon fruit (<i>diospyros kaki</i>) during vacuum and hot air drying process
;Alfadhl Yahya Khaled;Abraham Kabutey;Kemal Çağatay Selvi;Čestmír Mizera;Petr Hrabe;David Herák
Vol. 8 , No. 544 , pp. 544-
236 views DOI Abstract
2018
ball milling treatment of black dross for selective dissolution of alumina in sodium hydroxide leaching
;Thi Thuy Nhi Nguyen;Man Seung Lee;Thi Hong Nguyen
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 29-
213 views DOI Abstract
2017
A study of teaching methods on English literature using flipped learning and problem based learning
Park, J.
Vol. 20 , pp. 4345-4354
206 views
2018
separation of ag(i) by ion exchange and cementation from a raffinate containing ag(i), ni(ii) and zn(ii) and traces of cu(ii) and sn(ii)
;Wei Dong Xing;Man Seung Lee;Seung Hoon Choi
Vol. 6 , No. 8 , pp. 112-
196 views DOI Abstract
42
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.