brain and behavior | Journament

Journal Ranking

#321 / 33,784
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 12 hours ago

brain and behavior

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name brain behav
Abbreviated Name brain behav
ISSN 2162-3279
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (27 total)

2019
Rapid behavioral assay using handling test provides breed and sex differences in tameness of chickens.
Moroi, Saki;Nishimura, Kenji;Imai, Nana;Kunishige, Kyoko;Sato, Shun;Goto, Tatsuhiko;
, pp. e01394
357 views DOI Abstract
2020
Exploring the social cognition network in young adults with autism spectrum disorder using graph analysis.
Vagnetti, Roberto;Pino, Maria Chiara;Masedu, Francesco;Peretti, Sara;Le Donne, Ilenia;Rossi, Rodolfo;Valenti, Marco;Mazza, Monica;
, pp. e01524
331 views DOI Abstract
2020
Changes in resting-state functional connectivity in nonacute sciatica with acupuncture modulation: A preliminary study.
Liu, Ching-Hsiung;Yeh, Tzu-Chen;Kung, Yen-Ying;Tseng, Hung-Pin;Yang, Ching-Ju;Hong, Tzu-Yi;Cheng, Chou-Ming;Yang, Jen-Lin;Wu, Ta-Peng;Hsieh, Jen-Chuen;Chen, Fang-Pey;
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. e01494
315 views DOI Abstract
2019
Structural neuroimaging differentiates vulnerability from disease manifestation in colombian families with Huntington's disease.
Del C Valdés Hernández, Maria;Abu-Hussain, Janna;Qiu, Xinyi;Priller, Josef;Parra Rodríguez, Mario;Pino, Mariana;Báez, Sandra;Ibáñez, Agustín;
, pp. e01343
305 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cardiovascular surgery experience does not significantly improve patients' response to stroke.
Li, Shengde;Cui, Li-Ying;Anderson, Craig;Gao, Chunpeng;Yu, Chengdong;Shan, Guangliang;Wang, Longde;Peng, Bin;, ;
, pp. e01405
295 views DOI Abstract
2019
Coping strategies as moderating factors to compassion fatigue among critical care nurses
Al, Barmawi M.
Vol. 9 , pp. 0-0
281 views DOI
2020
Uric acid is associated with cognitive impairment in the elderly patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis-A two-center study.
Zhang, Jing;Tang, Lijuan;Hu, Jun;Wang, Yuwei;Xu, Yuzhen;
, pp. e01542
274 views DOI Abstract
2020
Using machine-learning approach to distinguish patients with methamphetamine dependence from healthy subjects in a virtual reality environment.
Ding, Xinfang;Li, Yuanhui;Li, Dai;Li, Ling;Liu, Xiuyun;
, pp. e01814
260 views DOI Abstract
2013
reconstructing the middle ages. dirck van bleyswijck’s beschryvinge der stadt delft and its uneasy relationship with the past
;Marcin Polkowski
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 247-264
253 views DOI Abstract
2014
bart leeuwenburgh. het noodlot van een ketter. adriaan koerbagh, 1633-1669. nijmegen, vantilt, 2013. 224 pp. isbn 978-94-6004-114-3. €19,95.
;David van der Linden
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 141-141
252 views DOI
View All 27 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.