journal of work and organizational psychology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#381 / 33,899
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 10 hours ago

journal of work and organizational psychology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name journal of work and organizational psychology
Abbreviated Name journal of work and organizational psychology
ISSN 1576-5962
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (41 total)

2007
the phenotype of diploid and triploid f1 of female kohaku and sanke koi with males white and red koi
;. Alimuddin;K. Sumantadinata;Yani Hadiroseyani
Vol. 1 , No. 3 , pp. 97-100
377 views DOI Abstract
2010
evaluation of the nutritional value of leucaena leucophala leaf meal hydrolyzed by sheep rumen liquor enzyme extract on the growth performance of nile tilapia (oreochromis niloticus)
;Indira Fitriliyani
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 30-37
357 views DOI Abstract
2017
Effect of leader-member exchange on employee envy and work behavior moderated by self-esteem and neuroticism
Shu, Chin-Yi;Lazatkhan, Jangul;
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 69-81
347 views Abstract
2017
effectiveness of ambon banana stem juice as immunostimulatory against aeromonas hydrophila infections in catfish clarias gariepinus
;Qorie Astria;Sri Nuryati;Kukuh Nirmala;Alimuddin Alimuddin
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 154-163
304 views DOI Abstract
2010
study on food habits of herring (clupea fimbriata) in ujung pangkah waters, east java
;. Sulistiono;M. Robiyanto;M. Brodjo;C.P. Simanjuntak
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 38-45
300 views DOI Abstract
2017
the concentration of optimum dissolved oxygen levels for growth of mangrove crab scylla serrata seed in recirculation system
;Kurnia Faturrohman;Kukuh Nirmala;Daniel Djokosetiyanto;Yuni Puji Hastuti
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 107-115
291 views DOI Abstract
2007
blood glukose response of giant gouramy (osphronemus gaouramy, lac.) to the stress of environmental temperature changes
;S. Hastuti;Eddy Supriyono;Ing Mokoginta;. Subandiyono
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 73-77
285 views DOI Abstract
2007
the caryotipe of endemic ornamental fish celebes rainbow (telmatherina ladigesi) from maros river, south sulawesi
;I. Andriani;N. Sugiri;Odang Carman;D.S. Sjafei
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 13-18
277 views DOI Abstract
2018
Capital Psicológico, Desempeño Contextual y Apoyo Social del Trabajo en Salud Primaria
Rodríguez-Cáceres, Claudio;Ramírez-Vielma, Raúl;Fernández-Ríos, Manuel;Bustos-Navarrete, Claudio;
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 123-
256 views Abstract
2008
preliminary study on bacterial pathogenic in grouper culture and its inhibitor bacteria in lampung bay
;A. Hatmanti;R. Nuchsin;Y. Darmayati
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 51-58
256 views DOI Abstract
View All 41 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.