jàmbá : journal of disaster risk studies | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6536 / 33,981
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

jàmbá : journal of disaster risk studies

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name jàmbá : journal of disaster risk studies
Abbreviated Name jàmbá : journal of disaster risk studies
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

2013
Communication management during the veld fires of 23 August 2011 in the Tlokwe Local Municipality: A cautionary tale
Wiggill, Magrita N.;
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. e1-e9
595 views Abstract
2018
A political economy analysis of decision-making on natural disaster preparedness in Kenya
Rono-Bett, Karen C.;
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e8
351 views Abstract
2013
‘Prevention is better than cure’: Assessing Ghana’s preparedness (capacity) for disaster management
Oteng-Ababio, Martin;
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. e1-e11
310 views Abstract
2016
The changing climate and human vulnerability in north-central Namibia
Angula, Margaret N.;Kaundjua, Maria B.;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e1-e7
299 views Abstract
2015
hydraulic theory and hydraulic engineering projects of the wusong river (吳淞江) basin between the sixteenth and nineteenth centuries
;Chulwoong Chung
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 47-84
286 views DOI Abstract
2009
The December 2004-January 2005 floods in the Garden Route region of the Southern Cape, South Africa
Tempelhoff, Johan;Niekerk, Dewald van;Eeden, Elize van;Gouws, Ina;Botha, Karin;Wurige, Rabson;
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 93-112
285 views Abstract
2019
Impact of climate change on primary agriculture, water sources and food security in Western Cape, South Africa
Zwane, Elliot M.;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e7
279 views Abstract
2006
Reducing Disaster Risk through Vulnerability Assessment: An Agricultural Perspective
Zyl, Koos van;
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 19-24
274 views Abstract
2018
hawaii, cannes, and los angeles: projecting south korean cinema to the world
;Sangjoon Lee
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 123-140
250 views DOI
2017
over the im/permeable boundaries: cinematization of in south korea and japan
;So Hye Kim
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 179-187
199 views DOI
View All 12 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.