Indexed in Journament

ecological indicators

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,619 of 21,144 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
83 Articles
Scores higher than 40.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name ecological indicators
Abbreviated Name ecological indicators

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.0
Accessibility 15.0 19.4
Timeliness 50.0 37.9
Diversity 30.0 30.1
Innovation 40.0 37.2
Community Impact 34.0 25.5
Content Distribution 73.7 85.4
Content Quality — 54.2
Ethics & Transparency — 39.5
Editorial Standards — 32.5
Publication Regularity — 51.6
Geographic Reach — 30.0

Publications Per Year

Articles (83)

2020
Containing urban expansion: Densification vs greenfield development, socio-demographic transformations and the economic crisis in a Southern European City, 2006–2015
Salvati, L.
Vol. 110 , pp. 0-0
369 views DOI
2020
Unravelling the population dynamics of the Mediterranean bryozoan Pentapora fascialis to assess its role as an indicator of recreational diving for adaptive management of marine protected areas
Pagès-Escolà, M.
Vol. 109 , pp. 0-0
344 views DOI
2019
Mapping coastal wetland soil salinity in different seasons using an improved comprehensive land surface factor system
Chi, Y.
Vol. 107 , pp. 0-0
326 views DOI
2020
Exploring land reclamation history: Soil organic carbon sequestration due to dramatic oasis agriculture expansion in arid region of Northwest China
Xu, E.
Vol. 108 , pp. 0-0
322 views DOI
2019
“Prediction of effective climate change indicators using statistical downscaling approach and impact assessment on pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) yield through genetic algorithm in Punjab, Pakistan” by Asmat Ullah, Nasrin Salehnia, Sohrab Kolsoumi, Ashfaq Ahmad, Tasneem Khaliq
Mohammadi, B.
Vol. 101 , pp. 973-974
315 views DOI
2019
Use of botanical insecticides for sustainable agriculture: Future perspectives
Campos, E.
Vol. 105 , pp. 483-495
314 views DOI
2020
A viable indicator approach for assessing sustainable forest management in terms of carbon emissions and removals
Köhl, M.
Vol. 111 , pp. 0-0
313 views DOI
2019
Coral reef fish community life history traits as potential global indicators of ecological and fisheries status
McClanahan, T.
Vol. 96 , pp. 133-145
304 views DOI
2020
Discriminating trees species from the relationship between spectral reflectance and chlorophyll contents of mangrove forest in Malaysia
Zulfa, A.
Vol. 111 , pp. 0-0
303 views DOI
2019
Monitoring of marine nematode communities through 18S rRNA metabarcoding as a sensitive alternative to morphology
Tytgat, B.
Vol. 107 , pp. 0-0
295 views DOI
2021
What does Atlantic Forest soundscapes can tell us about landscape?
Scarpelli, M.D.A.
Vol. 121 , pp. 0-0
103 views DOI
2021
Indicators of conservation priorities for medicinal plants from seasonal dry forests of northeastern Brazil
Campos, J.L.A.
Vol. 121 , pp. 0-0
111 views DOI
2020
Under predicted climate change: Distribution and ecological niche modelling of six native tree species in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan
Gilani, H.
Vol. 111 , pp. 0-0
166 views DOI
2020
Planetary boundary downscaling for absolute environmental sustainability assessment — Case study of Taiwan
Huang, L.H.
Vol. 114 , pp. 0-0
238 views DOI
2020
Modeling urban eco-environmental sustainability under uncertainty: Interval double-sided chance-constrained programming with spatial analysis
Jia, Q.M.
Vol. 115 , pp. 0-0
111 views DOI
2020
Evaluating ecosystem functioning of a long-term dumping site in the Bay of Seine (English Channel)
Raoux, A.
Vol. 115 , pp. 0-0
140 views DOI
2020
Development models matter to the mutual growth of ecosystem services and household incomes in developing rural neighborhoods
Zhang, K.
Vol. 115 , pp. 0-0
207 views DOI
2020
Dynamic changes of the ecological footprint in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from 1996 to 2020
Liu, L.
Vol. 112 , pp. 0-0
161 views DOI
2020
Response to Letter to the Editor: ‘Predicting total phosphorus levels as indicators for shallow lake management’
Vitense, K.
Vol. 111 , pp. 0-0
173 views DOI
2020
A viable indicator approach for assessing sustainable forest management in terms of carbon emissions and removals
Köhl, M.
Vol. 111 , pp. 0-0
313 views DOI
Journament Score
38.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,619 of 21,144 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.