bmc anesthesiology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#870 / 33,973
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated há 1 mês

bmc anesthesiology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexacoes
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Nome Abreviado bmc anesthesiol
Nome Abreviado bmc anesthesiol
ISSN 1471-2253
Objetivo e Escopo
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/12871
Instrucoes para Autores

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (9 total)

2019
Airway Management of the Right Anterior Segmentectomy through Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) after left pneumonectomy by an adapted double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT): a case report
Gu, Yang;Duan, Ruowang;Lv, Xin;Song, Jiong;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1-5
460 views Abstract
2019
Bilateral thoracic paravertebral block combined with general anesthesia vs. general anesthesia for patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a feasibility study.
Sun, Lixin;Li, Qiujie;Wang, Qiang;Ma, Fuguo;Han, Wei;Wang, Mingshan;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 101
454 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of several methods for pain management after video-assisted thoracic surgery for pneumothorax: an observational study.
Allain, Pierre-Antoine;Carella, Michele;Agrafiotis, Apostolos C;Burey, Julien;Assouad, Jalal;Hafiani, El-Mahdi;Ynineb, Yacine;Bonnet, Francis;Garnier, Marc;Quesnel, Christophe;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 120
409 views DOI Abstract
2017
Gabapentin in procedure-specific postoperative pain management – preplanned subgroup analyses from a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses
Fabritius, Maria Louise;Geisler, Anja;Petersen, Pernille Lykke;Wetterslev, Jørn;Mathiesen, Ole;Dahl, Jørgen Berg;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 1-20
357 views Abstract
2012
Inhibitor of neuronal nitric oxide synthase improves gas exchange in ventilator-induced lung injury after pneumonectomy
V, Suborov Evgeny;A, Smetkin Alexey;V, Kondratiev Timofey;Y, Valkov Andrey;V, Kuzkov Vsevolod;Y, Kirov Mikhail;J, Bjertnaes Lars;
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 10-
349 views Abstract
2019
Photoacoustic gas monitoring for anesthetic gas pollution measurements and its cross-sensitivity to alcoholic disinfectants.
Herzog-Niescery, Jennifer;Steffens, Thomas;Bellgardt, Martin;Breuer-Kaiser, Andreas;Gude, Philipp;Vogelsang, Heike;Weber, Thomas Peter;Seipp, Hans-Martin;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 148
346 views DOI Abstract
2020
Systematic review and bibliometric analysis of African anesthesia and critical care medicine research part I: hierarchy of evidence and scholarly productivity.
Kanmounye, Ulrick Sidney;Tochie, Joel Noutakdie;Mbonda, Aimé;Wafo, Cynthia Kévine;Daya, Leonid;Atem, Thompson Hope;Nyalundja, Arsène Daniel;Eyaman, Daniel Cheryl;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 247
342 views DOI Abstract
2020
Retrospective analysis of cases of intraoperative awareness in a large multi-hospital health system reported in the early postoperative period.
Deis, Amanda S;Schnetz, Michael P;Ibinson, James W;Vogt, Keith M;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 62
319 views DOI Abstract
2015
anthropological analysis of the skeletal series exhumed from the necropolis of piatra neamţ – dărmăneşti (xivth – xvth centuries)
;Vasilica-Monica Groza;Angela Simalcsik;Luminiţa Bejenaru;Robert-Daniel Simalcsik
Vol. XXXVIII , pp. 83-96
209 views Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.