Indexed in Journament

health promotion international

ISSN 1460-2245· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,935 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
38 Articles
Scores higher than 55.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name health promot int
Abbreviated Name health promot int
ISSN 1460-2245
URL https://academic.oup.com/heapro

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for health promotion international
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 70.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 9.3 7.8
Content Distribution 42.0 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (38)

2019
How can multiple frames enable action on social determinants? Lessons from Australia's paid parental leave.
430 views DOI Abstract
2020
Framing climate change and health: New Zealand's online news media.
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
'We know what we should eat but we don't …': a qualitative study in Irish secondary schools.
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Civil society action against transnational corporations: implications for health promotion.
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Physical activity and the built environment: perceptions of policy-makers in Oman.
416 views DOI Abstract
2019
Social enterprises' impact on older people's health and wellbeing: exploring Scottish experiences.
386 views DOI Abstract
2018
iatrogenic tracheal posterior wall perforation repaired with bronchoscope-guided knotless sutures through tracheostomy
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 277-279
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Emancipatory promotion of health: contributions from Brazil in the context of the Global South.
Vol. 34 , No. Supplement_1 , pp. i56-i64
376 views DOI Abstract
2019
Healthy urban planning: an institutional policy analysis of strategic planning in Sydney, Australia.
373 views DOI
2018
critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency in patients with low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery
Vol. 51 , No. 2 , pp. 109-113
367 views DOI Abstract
2026
Shadow pandemics: violence and vulnerability as part of the COVID-19 experience in Sub-Saharan Africa
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
A narrative review of qualitative studies exploring the normalization of gambling for youth and younger adults
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Applying the Ottawa Charter to evaluate health literacy outcomes of the Little Aussie Bugs course for Australian early childhood educators
23 views DOI Abstract
2020
Health literacy as a determinant of healthy eating and active living in Canadian immigrant youth.
354 views DOI Abstract
2020
Policymakers' perspectives on designing school-based health initiatives for Victorian adolescents.
265 views DOI Abstract
2020
Framing climate change and health: New Zealand's online news media.
427 views DOI Abstract
2020
Critical consciousness development: a systematic review of empirical studies.
346 views DOI Abstract
2020
Associations between gender equality and health: a systematic review.
Vol. 35 , No. 1 , pp. 27-41
279 views DOI Abstract
2019
Social enterprises' impact on older people's health and wellbeing: exploring Scottish experiences.
386 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,935 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

70.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

42.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.