health promotion international | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4043 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

health promotion international

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name health promot int
Abbreviated Name health promot int
ISSN 1460-2245
Aim and Scope
URL https://academic.oup.com/heapro
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (35 total)

2019
How can multiple frames enable action on social determinants? Lessons from Australia's paid parental leave.
Townsend, Belinda;Friel, Sharon;Baker, Phillip;Baum, Fran;Strazdins, Lyndall;
383 views DOI Abstract
2020
Framing climate change and health: New Zealand's online news media.
Harrison, Sarah;Macmillan, Alexandra;Rudd, Chris;
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Physical activity and the built environment: perceptions of policy-makers in Oman.
Mabry, Ruth M;Al Siyabi, Huda;Kannan, Muhssen;Al Siyabi, Amal;
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Civil society action against transnational corporations: implications for health promotion.
Anaf, Julia;Baum, Fran;Fisher, Matthew;Friel, Sharon;
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
'We know what we should eat but we don't …': a qualitative study in Irish secondary schools.
Browne, Sarah;Barron, Carol;Staines, Anthony;Sweeney, Mary Rose;
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
Social enterprises' impact on older people's health and wellbeing: exploring Scottish experiences.
Henderson, Fiona;Steiner, Artur;Mazzei, Micaela;Docherty, Catherine;
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
Emancipatory promotion of health: contributions from Brazil in the context of the Global South.
Porto, Marcelo Firpo;
Vol. 34 , No. Supplement_1 , pp. i56-i64
341 views DOI Abstract
2018
iatrogenic tracheal posterior wall perforation repaired with bronchoscope-guided knotless sutures through tracheostomy
;Yong Chae Jung;Kiick Sung;Jong Ho Cho
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 277-279
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Healthy urban planning: an institutional policy analysis of strategic planning in Sydney, Australia.
Harris, Patrick;Kent, Jennifer;Sainsbury, Peter;Riley, Emily;Sharma, Nila;Harris, Elizabeth;
334 views DOI
2018
critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency in patients with low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery
;You Jung Ok;Ju Yong Lim;Sung-Ho Jung
Vol. 51 , No. 2 , pp. 109-113
325 views DOI Abstract
View All 35 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.