african journal of primary health care & family medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#928 / 33,973
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 ay önce

african journal of primary health care & family medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indekslemeler
ncbi doaj
Kisa Ad afr j prim health care fam med
Kisaltilmis Ad afr j prim health care fam med
ISSN 2071-2936
Amac ve Kapsam
URL https://phcfm.org/index.php/phcfm
Yazar Talimatlari

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2016
Assessment of oral health promotion services offered as part of maternal and child health services in the Tshwane Health District, Pretoria, South Africa
Kolisa, Yolanda;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e8
523 views Abstract
2014
The diabetic foot risks profile in Selebi Phikwe Government Hospital, Botswana
Tshitenge, Stephane;Ganiyu, Adewale;Mbuka, Deogratias;Shama, Joseph M.;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e5
505 views Abstract
2016
assessment of high-sensitivity c-reactive protein values in chronic periodontitis patients with and without cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study
;D Deepa;Chandni Gupta;Abhishek Gupta
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 108-112
441 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reasons why insured consumers co-pay for medicines at retail pharmacies in Pretoria, South Africa.
Mpanza, Ntobeko M;Bradley, Hazel;Laing, Richard;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e6
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Family physicians' experience and understanding of evidence-based practice and guideline implementation in primary care practice, Cape Town, South Africa.
Pather, Michael K;Mash, Robert;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e10
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Indigenous and faith healing in Ghana: A brief examination of the formalising process and collaborative efforts with the biomedical health system.
Kpobi, Lily;Swartz, Leslie;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e5
373 views DOI Abstract
2017
Which primary care model? A qualitative analysis of ward-based outreach teams in South Africa.
Marcus, Tessa S;Hugo, Jannie;Jinabhai, Champak C;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e8
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Current policies and practices for the provision of diabetes care and self-management support programmes for older South Africans.
Werfalli, Mahmoud;Murphy, Katherine;Kalula, Sebastiana;Levitt, Naomi;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e12
359 views DOI Abstract
2018
Why high tech needs high touch: Supporting continuity of community primary health care.
Meyer, Ellenore D;Hugo, Johannes F M;Marcus, Tessa S;Molebatsi, Rebaone;Komana, Kabelo;
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e6
348 views DOI Abstract
2018
The role of gender in the spread of HIV and AIDS among farmworkers in South Africa.
Klaas, Ntombifikile E;Thupayagale-Tshweneagae, Gloria;Makua, Thuledi P;
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e8
302 views DOI Abstract
View All 15 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
50
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.