medical anthropology quarterly | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2577 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated il y a 3 semaines

medical anthropology quarterly

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexations
scopus ncbi ulakbim soc
Nom Abrégé med anthropol q
Nom Abrégé med anthropol q
ISSN 0745-5194
Objectifs et Portée
URL https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15481387
Instructions aux Auteurs

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2017
re: duration of urination does not change with body size
;Fehmi Narter
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 35-35
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pharmaceutical Creep: U.S. Military Power and the Global and Transnational Mobility of Psychopharmaceuticals.
Chua, Jocelyn Lim;
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
MDMA Is Not Ecstasy: The Production of Pharmaceutical Safety through Documents in Clinical Trials.
Hendy, Katherine;
306 views DOI Abstract
2018
a rare cause of scrotal mass in a newborn: antenatal intravaginal testicular torsion
;Ahmet Ali Tuncer;Altınay Bayraktaroğlu;Kadir Yümlü;Didem Baskın Embleton;Salih Çetinkurşun
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 44-46
290 views DOI Abstract
2018
re: male infertility: a biomarker of individual and familial cancer risk
;Emre Bakırcıoğlu
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 54-54
290 views DOI
2018
Cell Phones ≠ Self and Other Problems with Big Data Detection and Containment during Epidemics
Erikson, S.
Vol. 32 , pp. 315-339
287 views DOI
2017
re: varicocelectomy to “upgrade” semen quality to allow couples to use less invasive forms of assisted reproductive technology
;Samplaski MK;Lo KC;Grober ED;Zini A;Jarvi KA
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 220-220
271 views DOI
2015
assessment of differential renal function in children with hydronephrosis: comparison of dmsa and mag-3
;Cem Akbal;Ahmet Şahan;Asgar Garayev;Çağrı Akın Şekerci;Muhammed Sulukaya;Harika Alpay;Tufan Tarcan;Ferruh Şimşek
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 129-134
270 views DOI Abstract
2006
Violence and the body: somatic expressions of trauma and vulnerability during war.
Henry, Doug;
Vol. 20 , No. 3 , pp. 379-98
228 views Abstract
2014
http://jurolsurgery.org/article_7433/suture-related-iatrogenic-bladder-stone
;Hoon Choi;Jae Heon Kim;Ji Sung Shim;Jae Young Park;Seok Ho Kang; Du Geon Moon;Jun Cheon;Jeong Gu Lee;Je Jong Kim;Jae-Hyun Bae
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 46-46
210 views Abstract
View All 13 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.