Indexed in Journament

journal of clinical anesthesia

ISSN 1873-4529· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #9,306 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
93 Articles
Scores higher than 68.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nome Abreviado j clin anesth
Nome Abreviado journal of clinical anesthesia
ISSN 1873-4529
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-clinical-anesthesia

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 64.8 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 10.0 13.4
Content Distribution 68.3 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (93)

2019
Efficacy of a multidisciplinary approach on postoperative morbidity and mortality of elderly patients with hip fracture.
Reguant, F;Arnau, A;Lorente, J V;Maestro, L;Bosch, J;
Vol. 53 , pp. 11-19
441 views DOI Abstract
2020
The effect of ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block, single-injection erector spinae plane block and multiple-injection paravertebral block on postoperative analgesia in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial
Chen, N.
Vol. 59 , pp. 106-111
435 views DOI Abstract
2019
Erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery compared to IV-morphine: A randomized controlled trial.
Gürkan, Yavuz;Aksu, Can;Kuş, Alparslan;Yörükoğlu, Ufuk H;
Vol. 59 , pp. 84-88
406 views DOI Abstract
2020
SARS-CoV-2 infection control measures for the anesthesiology department: experience from the Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, China.
Xie, Min;Huang, Jian Xin;Chen, Pan Pan;Wei, Xin Chuan;Li, Xiang Kui;Zhang, Ping;Yang, Li Na;Zhou, Qin;
Vol. 64 , pp. 109846
373 views DOI
2020
Association between higher BMI and postoperative pain and opioid consumption in pediatric inpatients - A retrospective cohort study.
Cohen, Barak;Tanios, Marianne A;Koyuncu, Onur;Yilmaz, Huseyin Oguz;Raza, Syed;Mukhdomi, Junaid;Artis, Amanda S;Seif, John;Chhabada, Surendrasingh;Turan, Alparslan;
Vol. 62 , pp. 109729
355 views DOI Abstract
2020
Late first-case of the day starts do not cause greater minutes of over-utilized time at an endoscopy suite with 8-hour workdays and late running rooms. A historical cohort study
Dexter, F.
Vol. 59 , pp. 18-25
351 views DOI
2011
Passive smoke exposure is associated with perioperative adverse effects in children.
Seyidov, Tulay Hosten;Elemen, Levent;Solak, Mine;Tugay, Melih;Toker, Kamil;
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 47-52
334 views DOI Abstract
2019
Erector spinae plane (ESP) block with a transverse in-plane approach for management of referred shoulder pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Raft, J.
Vol. 55 , pp. 100-101
329 views DOI
2020
Erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery compared to IV-morphine: A randomized controlled trial
Gürkan, Y.
Vol. 59 , pp. 84-88
328 views DOI
2020
The association of preoperative delirium with postoperative outcomes following hip surgery in the elderly
Agrawal, S.
Vol. 60 , pp. 28-33
321 views DOI
2020
Does acute normovolemic hemodilution shorten viscoelastic test clot initiation after cardiopulmonary bypass?
Kristobak, B.M.
Vol. 67 , pp. 0-0
223 views DOI
2020
Anesthetic management for cesarean birth in pregnancy with the novel coronavirus (COVID-19)
Yilmaz, R.
Vol. 66 , pp. 0-0
198 views DOI
2020
Cardiac arrest during emergency intubation in an elderly patient with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019
Tao, K.m.
Vol. 66 , pp. 0-0
231 views DOI
2020
Novel method of performing brachial plexus block using an aerosol box during COVID-19 pandemic.
Kulkarni, Rammurthy R;Stephen, Madona;Shashank, Amrita;Mandhal, Lavanya N;
Vol. 66 , pp. 109943
296 views DOI
2020
Medical education in the COVID-19 era: Impact on anesthesiology trainees.
Anwar, Anjum;Seger, Christian;Tollefson, Ashley;Diachun, Carol Ann B;Tanaka, Pedro;Umar, Soban;
Vol. 66 , pp. 109949
281 views DOI
2020
Airway management and ventilation principles in COVID-19 patients.
Szarpak, Lukasz;Drozd, Anna;Smereka, Jacek;
Vol. 65 , pp. 109877
299 views DOI
2020
Can glycopyrrolate come to the airway rescue in Covid-19 patients?
Garg, H.
Vol. 64 , pp. 0-0
156 views DOI
2020
Chronic pain management in COVID-19 era
Piraccini, E.
Vol. 65 , pp. 0-0
188 views DOI
2020
Peripheral nerve blocks in a patient with suspected COVID-19 infection
Kilicaslan, A.
Vol. 65 , pp. 0-0
143 views DOI
2020
How to perform tracheal intubation for COVID-19 patients safely and effectively: Experience AND tips from Sichuan, China
Huang, J.
Vol. 64 , pp. 0-0
256 views DOI
Journament Score
39.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #9,306 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

64.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

68.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.