journal of clinical anesthesia | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2138 / 33,968
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of clinical anesthesia

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name j clin anesth
Abbreviated Name journal of clinical anesthesia
ISSN 1873-4529
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-clinical-anesthesia
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (93 total)

2020
The effect of ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block, single-injection erector spinae plane block and multiple-injection paravertebral block on postoperative analgesia in thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial
Chen, N.
Vol. 59 , pp. 106-111
399 views DOI Abstract
2019
Efficacy of a multidisciplinary approach on postoperative morbidity and mortality of elderly patients with hip fracture.
Reguant, F;Arnau, A;Lorente, J V;Maestro, L;Bosch, J;
Vol. 53 , pp. 11-19
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery compared to IV-morphine: A randomized controlled trial.
Gürkan, Yavuz;Aksu, Can;Kuş, Alparslan;Yörükoğlu, Ufuk H;
Vol. 59 , pp. 84-88
364 views DOI Abstract
2020
SARS-CoV-2 infection control measures for the anesthesiology department: experience from the Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, China.
Xie, Min;Huang, Jian Xin;Chen, Pan Pan;Wei, Xin Chuan;Li, Xiang Kui;Zhang, Ping;Yang, Li Na;Zhou, Qin;
Vol. 64 , pp. 109846
336 views DOI
2020
Late first-case of the day starts do not cause greater minutes of over-utilized time at an endoscopy suite with 8-hour workdays and late running rooms. A historical cohort study
Dexter, F.
Vol. 59 , pp. 18-25
318 views DOI
2011
Passive smoke exposure is associated with perioperative adverse effects in children.
Seyidov, Tulay Hosten;Elemen, Levent;Solak, Mine;Tugay, Melih;Toker, Kamil;
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 47-52
302 views DOI Abstract
2020
Association between higher BMI and postoperative pain and opioid consumption in pediatric inpatients - A retrospective cohort study.
Cohen, Barak;Tanios, Marianne A;Koyuncu, Onur;Yilmaz, Huseyin Oguz;Raza, Syed;Mukhdomi, Junaid;Artis, Amanda S;Seif, John;Chhabada, Surendrasingh;Turan, Alparslan;
Vol. 62 , pp. 109729
301 views DOI Abstract
2019
Erector spinae plane (ESP) block with a transverse in-plane approach for management of referred shoulder pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Raft, J.
Vol. 55 , pp. 100-101
301 views DOI
2020
Erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery compared to IV-morphine: A randomized controlled trial
Gürkan, Y.
Vol. 59 , pp. 84-88
296 views DOI
2020
The association of preoperative delirium with postoperative outcomes following hip surgery in the elderly
Agrawal, S.
Vol. 60 , pp. 28-33
293 views DOI
View All 93 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.