Indexed in Journament

psam 2014 - probabilistic safety assessment and management

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,420 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
17 Articles
Scores higher than 6.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name psam 2014 - probabilistic safety assessment and management
Abbreviated Name psam 2014 - probabilistic safety assessment and management

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.3
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 27.0
Community Impact 3.6
Content Distribution 59.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.1
Accessibility — 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 27.0 31.2
Community Impact 3.6 13.4
Content Distribution 59.1 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2018
the efficacy of kinesiology taping in supporting the medial longitudinal arch in patients with unilateral plantar fasciitis
;Banu Ordahan
Vol. 53 , No. 3 , pp. 116-122
516 views DOI Abstract
2017
an epidemiological investigation of skiing injuries in erciyes ski centre
;Gökmen Özen;Emrah Yılmaz;Hürmüz Koç;Cengiz Akalan
Vol. 52 , No. 2 , pp. 51-62
416 views DOI Abstract
2016
paget - schroetter syndrome in athletes (primary effort thrombosis)
;Şeyma Torgutalp;Melda Pelin Yargıç;Gürhan Dönmez;Mahmut Nedim Doral
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 135-141
269 views DOI Abstract
2015
the effects of acute mild hypobaric hypoxia on old rats’ myocardial left ventricle oxidative damage
;Eda AĞAŞÇIOĞLU
Vol. 50 , No. 4 , pp. 175-184
269 views Abstract
2017
s-38: grekoromen stil güreş yapan sporcularda vertimax Çalışmalarının anaerobik güce ve bacak kuvvetine etkisi
;Adnan Ersoy;Oğuzhan Yüksel;Halit Harmancı;Mihri Barış Karavelioğlu;Mert Kayhan;Mustafa Said Erzeybek
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 38-38
211 views DOI Abstract
2014
Reliability/availability methods for subsea risers and deepwater systems design and optimization
Di, Padova A.
, pp. 0-0
208 views
2015
the effectiveness of shock wave treatment in subcalcaneal pain syndrome
;Canan GÖNEN AYDIN;Çağrı ÖZCAN;Sami SÖKÜCÜ;Yavuz Selim KABUKÇUOĞLU
Vol. 50 , No. 3 , pp. 101-108
204 views Abstract
2017
s-18: futbol ve hentbolcuların fonksiyonel hareket değerlendirme test sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması
;Ahmet Bayrak;Bilen Galip Kürklü;Necmiye Ün Yıldırım;Üzeyr Taha İşcan;Tuğba Kocahan
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 18-18
200 views DOI Abstract
2017
s-10: futbolda yetenek paradigması ve liyakat: bir retrospektif yaklaşım
;Cemal Polat
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 10-10
198 views DOI Abstract
2017
s-11: rio 2016 paralimpik oyunlarına hazırlanan türkiye paralimpik milli takımı ağız-diş sağlığı profili
;Osman Hamamcılar;Tuğba Kocahan;Adnan Hasanoğlu;Burhan Başoğlu
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 11-11
171 views DOI Abstract
2018
evaluation of alpine skiing injuries in terms of personal precautions: erciyes sample
;Emrah Yılmaz;Gökmen Özen;Hürmüz Koç
Vol. 53 , No. 1 , pp. 9-16
141 views DOI Abstract
2018
site and type assessments of sports injuries in archers
;Gizem Kocaman;Emrah Atay;Mahmut Alp;Gürhan Suna
Vol. 53 , No. 1 , pp. 1-8
37 views DOI Abstract
2018
the efficacy of kinesiology taping in supporting the medial longitudinal arch in patients with unilateral plantar fasciitis
;Banu Ordahan
Vol. 53 , No. 3 , pp. 116-122
516 views DOI Abstract
2017
p-14: adölesan dönemi yüzücülerin birim antrenmanda uygulanan İnterval antrenmanların nabız ve oksijen saturasyon düzeylerinin İncelenmesi
;Fatih Kılınç;Erkan Günay;Askın Sentürk;Gökmen Özen
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 57-57
152 views DOI Abstract
2017
s-17: tekvando sporcularının İzokinetik kas kuvveti karakteristiğinin belirlenmesi
;Tuğba Kocahan;Bihter Akınoğlu;Özge Çoban;Çağlar Soylu;Necmiye Ün Yıldırım;Adnan Hasanoğlu
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 17-17
146 views DOI Abstract
2017
p-05: bir olgu sunumu: egzersizle tetiklenen kanat skapula
;Aynur Sevgi Arslan
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 48-48
144 views DOI Abstract
2017
an epidemiological investigation of skiing injuries in erciyes ski centre
;Gökmen Özen;Emrah Yılmaz;Hürmüz Koç;Cengiz Akalan
Vol. 52 , No. 2 , pp. 51-62
416 views DOI Abstract
2017
s-23: sağlıklı kişilerde triseps surae kasına uygulanan kinesio tape ve rijit tape uygulamalarının dikey sıçrama ve dinamik denge Üzerine anlık etkilerinin araştırılması
;Mert Şaban Ergin;Feryal Subaşı
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 23-23
164 views DOI Abstract
2017
s-10: futbolda yetenek paradigması ve liyakat: bir retrospektif yaklaşım
;Cemal Polat
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 10-10
198 views DOI Abstract
2017
s-18: futbol ve hentbolcuların fonksiyonel hareket değerlendirme test sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması
;Ahmet Bayrak;Bilen Galip Kürklü;Necmiye Ün Yıldırım;Üzeyr Taha İşcan;Tuğba Kocahan
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 18-18
200 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
25.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,420 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

25.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

27.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

59.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.