psam 2014 - probabilistic safety assessment and management | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4261 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

psam 2014 - probabilistic safety assessment and management

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name psam 2014 - probabilistic safety assessment and management
Abbreviated Name psam 2014 - probabilistic safety assessment and management
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2018
the efficacy of kinesiology taping in supporting the medial longitudinal arch in patients with unilateral plantar fasciitis
;Banu Ordahan
Vol. 53 , No. 3 , pp. 116-122
487 views DOI Abstract
2017
an epidemiological investigation of skiing injuries in erciyes ski centre
;Gökmen Özen;Emrah Yılmaz;Hürmüz Koç;Cengiz Akalan
Vol. 52 , No. 2 , pp. 51-62
389 views DOI Abstract
2016
paget - schroetter syndrome in athletes (primary effort thrombosis)
;Şeyma Torgutalp;Melda Pelin Yargıç;Gürhan Dönmez;Mahmut Nedim Doral
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 135-141
238 views DOI Abstract
2015
the effects of acute mild hypobaric hypoxia on old rats’ myocardial left ventricle oxidative damage
;Eda AĞAŞÇIOĞLU
Vol. 50 , No. 4 , pp. 175-184
234 views Abstract
2017
s-38: grekoromen stil güreş yapan sporcularda vertimax Çalışmalarının anaerobik güce ve bacak kuvvetine etkisi
;Adnan Ersoy;Oğuzhan Yüksel;Halit Harmancı;Mihri Barış Karavelioğlu;Mert Kayhan;Mustafa Said Erzeybek
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 38-38
203 views DOI Abstract
2014
Reliability/availability methods for subsea risers and deepwater systems design and optimization
Di, Padova A.
, pp. 0-0
192 views
2015
the effectiveness of shock wave treatment in subcalcaneal pain syndrome
;Canan GÖNEN AYDIN;Çağrı ÖZCAN;Sami SÖKÜCÜ;Yavuz Selim KABUKÇUOĞLU
Vol. 50 , No. 3 , pp. 101-108
184 views Abstract
2017
s-18: futbol ve hentbolcuların fonksiyonel hareket değerlendirme test sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması
;Ahmet Bayrak;Bilen Galip Kürklü;Necmiye Ün Yıldırım;Üzeyr Taha İşcan;Tuğba Kocahan
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 18-18
181 views DOI Abstract
2017
s-10: futbolda yetenek paradigması ve liyakat: bir retrospektif yaklaşım
;Cemal Polat
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 10-10
176 views DOI Abstract
2017
s-11: rio 2016 paralimpik oyunlarına hazırlanan türkiye paralimpik milli takımı ağız-diş sağlığı profili
;Osman Hamamcılar;Tuğba Kocahan;Adnan Hasanoğlu;Burhan Başoğlu
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 11-11
151 views DOI Abstract
View All 17 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.