Indexed in Journament

jama internal medicine

ISSN 2168-6114· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,427 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
25 Articles
Scores higher than 50.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name jama intern med
Abbreviated Name jama intern med
ISSN 2168-6114
URL http://archinte.ama-assn.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 14.1 26.3
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.7 4.3
Content Distribution 66.6 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (25)

2019
Associations of Child Maltreatment and Intimate Partner Violence With Elder Abuse in a US Chinese Population.
Dong, XinQi;Wang, Bei;
Vol. 179 , No. 7 , pp. 889-896
455 views DOI Abstract
2019
Acute Care for Patients Who Are Incarcerated: A Review.
Haber, Lawrence A;Erickson, Hans P;Ranji, Sumant R;Ortiz, Gabriel M;Pratt, Lisa A;
423 views DOI Abstract
2019
Disparities in Acceptance of Deceased Donor Kidneys Between the United States and France and Estimated Effects of Increased US Acceptance.
Aubert, Olivier;Reese, Peter P;Audry, Benoit;Bouatou, Yassine;Raynaud, Marc;Viglietti, Denis;Legendre, Christophe;Glotz, Denis;Empana, Jean-Phillipe;Jouven, Xavier;Lefaucheur, Carmen;Jacquelinet, Christian;Loupy, Alexandre;
413 views DOI Abstract
2016
Prevention of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Steffens D;Maher CG;Pereira LS;Stevens ML;Oliveira VC;Chapple M;Teixeira-Salmela LF;Hancock MJ;;
Vol. 176 , No. 2 , pp. -
388 views Abstract
2017
Using risk stratification to reduce medical errors in cervical cancer prevention
Perkins, R.
Vol. 177 , pp. 1411-1412
369 views DOI
2019
Trends in Mortality for Medicare Beneficiaries Treated in the Emergency Department From 2009 to 2016.
Burke, Laura G;Epstein, Stephen K;Burke, Ryan C;Orav, E John;Jha, Ashish K;
, pp. 1-9
365 views DOI Abstract
2018
Association of Medical and Adult-Use Marijuana Laws With Opioid Prescribing for Medicaid Enrollees.
Wen, Hefei;Hockenberry, Jason M;
Vol. 178 , No. 5 , pp. 673-679
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
Centers of Excellence Designations, Clinical Outcomes, and Characteristics of Hospitals Performing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
Khatana, S.
Vol. 179 , pp. 1138-1140
339 views DOI
2019
Outcomes Before and After the Recall of a Heart Failure Pacemaker.
Sengupta, Jay;Storey, Katelyn;Casey, Susan;Trager, Lena;Buescher, Melissa;Horning, Mark;Gornick, Charles;Abdelhadi, Raed;Tang, Chuen;Brill, Suzanne;Ashbach, Laura;Hauser, Robert G;
314 views DOI Abstract
2013
Differential diagnosis: Distinguishing between ghostwriting and professional medical writing in biomedical journals
Hamilton, C.
Vol. 173 , pp. 2091-2092
311 views DOI
2019
Centers of Excellence Designations, Clinical Outcomes, and Characteristics of Hospitals Performing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
Khatana, S.
Vol. 179 , pp. 1138-1140
339 views DOI
2019
Strategies to Identify Women at High Risk of Advanced Breast Cancer During Routine Screening for Discussion of Supplemental Imaging.
Kerlikowske, Karla;Sprague, Brian L;Tosteson, Anna N A;Wernli, Karen J;Rauscher, Garth H;Johnson, Dianne;Buist, Diana S M;Onega, Tracy;Henderson, Louise M;O'Meara, Ellen S;Miglioretti, Diana L;
187 views DOI Abstract
2019
Erratum: Errors in Data Entry and Figures (JAMA internal medicine (2018) 178 10 (1317-1330))
not, found
Vol. 179 , pp. 596
304 views DOI
2019
Outcomes Before and After the Recall of a Heart Failure Pacemaker.
Sengupta, Jay;Storey, Katelyn;Casey, Susan;Trager, Lena;Buescher, Melissa;Horning, Mark;Gornick, Charles;Abdelhadi, Raed;Tang, Chuen;Brill, Suzanne;Ashbach, Laura;Hauser, Robert G;
314 views DOI Abstract
2019
Trends in Mortality for Medicare Beneficiaries Treated in the Emergency Department From 2009 to 2016.
Burke, Laura G;Epstein, Stephen K;Burke, Ryan C;Orav, E John;Jha, Ashish K;
, pp. 1-9
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Public Disclosure of the Filing of New Drug and Therapeutic Biologics Applications with the US Food and Drug Administration
Chahal, H.
Vol. 179 , pp. 1144-1146
197 views DOI
2019
Women and Children First: Promoting Empowerment Through Resistance Education - Reply
Thurston, R.
Vol. 179 , pp. 278-279
187 views DOI
2019
Women and Children First: Promoting Empowerment Through Resistance Education
McClelland, K.
Vol. 179 , pp. 277-278
179 views DOI
2019
Associations of Child Maltreatment and Intimate Partner Violence With Elder Abuse in a US Chinese Population.
Dong, XinQi;Wang, Bei;
Vol. 179 , No. 7 , pp. 889-896
455 views DOI Abstract
2019
Acute Care for Patients Who Are Incarcerated: A Review.
Haber, Lawrence A;Erickson, Hans P;Ranji, Sumant R;Ortiz, Gabriel M;Pratt, Lisa A;
423 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
30.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,427 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

30.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

14.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

66.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.