international psychogeriatrics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1312 / 33,981
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

international psychogeriatrics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name int psychogeriatr
Abbreviated Name int psychogeriatr
ISSN 1741-203X
Aim and Scope
URL http://journals.cambridge.org/IPG
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2013
application potential of agent based simulation and discrete event simulation in enterprise integration modelling concepts
;Paul-Eric DOSSOU;Paulina GOLINSKA;Pawel PAWLEWSKI
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 33-42
470 views Abstract
2020
Brain health INnovation Diplomacy: a model binding diverse disciplines to manage the promise and perils of technological innovation.
Ternes, Kylie;Iyengar, Vijeth;Lavretsky, Helen;Dawson, Walter D;Booi, Laura;Ibanez, Agustin;Vahia, Ipsit;Reynolds, Charles;DeKosky, Steven;Cummings, Jeffrey;Miller, Bruce;Perissinotto, Carla;Kaye, Jeffrey;Eyre, Harris A;
, pp. 1-25
376 views DOI Abstract
2010
Prevalence and correlates of clinically significant depressive symptoms among elderly people in Sri Lanka: findings from a national survey.
Malhotra, Rahul;Chan, Angelique;Ostbye, Truls;
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 227-36
371 views DOI Abstract
2013
knowledge in value creation process for increasing competitive advantage
;Veronika ŠRAMOVÁ;Anna ZÁVODSKÁ;Anne-Maria AHO
Vol. 1 , No. 3 , pp. 35-47
359 views Abstract
2017
An economic analysis of a community-based model for dementia care in Ireland: a balance of care approach.
O'Shea, Eamon;Monaghan, Christine;
Vol. 29 , No. 7 , pp. 1175-1184
357 views DOI Abstract
2018
Social support networks and psychological wellbeing in community-dwelling older Ghanaian cohorts.
Gyasi, Razak M;Phillips, David R;Abass, Kabila;
, pp. 1-11
355 views DOI Abstract
2018
A randomized controlled trial examining the impact of aged care residents' written life-stories on aged care staff knowledge and attitudes.
Dennerstein, Michelle;Bhar, Sunil S;Castles, Jencie J;
Vol. 30 , No. 9 , pp. 1291-1299
320 views DOI Abstract
2020
Cultural and linguistic proficiency in mental health care: a crucial aspect of professional competence
Marquine, M.
Vol. 32 , pp. 1-3
287 views DOI
2013
advances in distributed computing and artificial intelligence jornual, 2013, vol. 1, n. 4, pp. 1-66
;Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 1-66
260 views
2018
the delimitation of freedom of speech on the internet: the confrontation of rights and digital censorship
;Francisco José ARANDA SERNA;Javier BELDA INIESTA
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 5-12
230 views DOI Abstract
View All 11 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.