Indexed in Journament

Health science reports

ISSN 2398-8835· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.6 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #809 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
8 Articles
Scores higher than 97.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Health Sci Rep
Abbreviated Name health sci rep
ISSN 2398-8835
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/23988835

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Health science reports
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.3 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 60.0 3.0
Diversity 57.4 26.3
Innovation 54.0 24.1
Community Impact 9.3 4.3
Content Distribution 66.4 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (8)

2018
Using community pharmacies to expand access to screening for noncommunicable diseases in suburban Ghana-A facility-based survey on client needs and acceptability.
Vol. 1 , No. 9 , pp. e79
496 views DOI Abstract
2018
Intergenerational differences in social support for the community-living elderly in Beijing, China.
Vol. 1 , No. 11 , pp. e96
402 views DOI Abstract
2020
Community health promotion programs for older adults: What helps and hinders implementation.
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. e144
377 views DOI Abstract
2020
la concepción latinoamericanista para la enseñanza de la historia de américa
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 90-100
282 views Abstract
2022
The information-seeking behavior of medical sciences students toward COVID-19 in mass and social media: A cross-sectional study.
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. e648
237 views DOI Abstract
2023
COVID-19 among health care workers and their impact on the health care system in a teaching hospital in Pakistan: A cross sectional observational study.
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. e975
152 views DOI Abstract
2025
Communication Between Parents and Young People on Sexual and Reproductive Health Issues and Its Associated Factors in Holeta and Bako Towns, Oromia, West Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Vol. 8 , pp. e70820
114 views DOI Abstract
2025
Communication Between Parents and Young People on Sexual and Reproductive Health Issues and Its Associated Factors in Holeta and Bako Towns, Oromia, West Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Vol. 8 , pp. e70820
114 views DOI Abstract
2023
COVID-19 among health care workers and their impact on the health care system in a teaching hospital in Pakistan: A cross sectional observational study.
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. e975
152 views DOI Abstract
2022
The information-seeking behavior of medical sciences students toward COVID-19 in mass and social media: A cross-sectional study.
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. e648
237 views DOI Abstract
2020
la concepción latinoamericanista para la enseñanza de la historia de américa
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 90-100
282 views Abstract
2020
Community health promotion programs for older adults: What helps and hinders implementation.
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. e144
377 views DOI Abstract
2018
Using community pharmacies to expand access to screening for noncommunicable diseases in suburban Ghana-A facility-based survey on client needs and acceptability.
Vol. 1 , No. 9 , pp. e79
496 views DOI Abstract
2018
Intergenerational differences in social support for the community-living elderly in Beijing, China.
Vol. 1 , No. 11 , pp. e96
402 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
43.6/100 · Below Average
Ranked #809 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

43.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

57.4/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

54.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

66.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.