Health science reports | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3718 / 33,968
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Health science reports

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name Health Sci Rep
Abbreviated Name health sci rep
ISSN 2398-8835
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/23988835
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (8 total)

2018
Using community pharmacies to expand access to screening for noncommunicable diseases in suburban Ghana-A facility-based survey on client needs and acceptability.
Akutey, Richard;Der, Reina;Owusu-Daaku, Frances;Baiden, Frank;
Vol. 1 , No. 9 , pp. e79
409 views DOI Abstract
2018
Intergenerational differences in social support for the community-living elderly in Beijing, China.
Cheng, Yang;Xi, Jing;Rosenberg, Mark W;Gao, Siyao;
Vol. 1 , No. 11 , pp. e96
332 views DOI Abstract
2020
Community health promotion programs for older adults: What helps and hinders implementation.
Sims-Gould, Joanie;Franke, Thea;Lusina-Furst, Sarah;McKay, Heather A;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. e144
309 views DOI Abstract
2020
la concepción latinoamericanista para la enseñanza de la historia de américa
;Legna Vázquez-Fernández;Reinaldo Estrada-Serrano
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 90-100
220 views Abstract
2022
The information-seeking behavior of medical sciences students toward COVID-19 in mass and social media: A cross-sectional study.
Amiri, Parasto;Moulaei, Khadijeh;Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz;Ghaemi, Mohammad Mehdi;Sheikhtaheri, Abbas;
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. e648
178 views DOI Abstract
2023
COVID-19 among health care workers and their impact on the health care system in a teaching hospital in Pakistan: A cross sectional observational study.
Haq, Faiz Ul;Rahman, Saeed Ur;Imran, Muhammad;Romman, Muhammad;Shah, Asaf;Aslam, Zeenaf;Ullah, Farman;Madadi, Shekiba;Dino Steinmetz, Carl Hermann;Cuschieri, Sarah;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. e975
108 views DOI Abstract
2025
Factors Associated With Low Birth Weight Among Under‐Five Children in Sub‐Saharan Africa: Evidence From Demographic and Health Surveys of 58,857 Children
Adedokun, Sulaimon T.; Yaya, Sanni
Vol. 8 , pp. (4)
102 views DOI Abstract
2025
Communication Between Parents and Young People on Sexual and Reproductive Health Issues and Its Associated Factors in Holeta and Bako Towns, Oromia, West Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Muse, Tsegaye Benti; Ayeno, Hunduma Dinsa; Mengistu, Mulugeta Mekuria; Gemechu, Yohannes Bacha; Shallo, Seifadin Ahmed; Bala, Elias Teferi
Vol. 8 , pp. e70820
67 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.