Indexed in Journament

journal of memory and language

ISSN 0749-596X· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #19,574 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
14 Articles
Scores higher than 33.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j mem lang
Abbreviated Name journal of memory and language
ISSN 0749-596X
URL http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jml

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 66.7 25.8
Innovation 10.5 27.4
Community Impact 1.4 7.8
Content Distribution 65.4 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (14)

2019
A computational model of reading across development: Effects of literacy onset on language processing
Chang, Y.
Vol. 108 , pp. 0-0
511 views DOI
2019
Individual differences in subphonemic sensitivity and phonological skills.
Li, Monica Y C;Braze, David;Kukona, Anuenue;Johns, Clinton L;Tabor, Whitney;Van Dyke, Julie A;Mencl, W Einar;Shankweiler, Donald P;Pugh, Kenneth R;Magnuson, James S;
Vol. 107 , pp. 195-215
311 views DOI Abstract
2019
The role of prior knowledge in incremental associative learning: An empirical and computational approach
Bein, O.
Vol. 107 , pp. 1-24
303 views DOI
2017
quality of oral surgery referrals and how to improve them
;Bjorkeborn M;Nilsson H;Anderud J
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 111-116
284 views Abstract
2009
evolution of photography in maxillofacial surgery: from analog to 3d photography – an overview
;Heidrun Schaaf;Christoph Yves Malik;Hans-Peter Howaldt;et al
Vol. 2009 , No. default , pp. 39-45
278 views Abstract
2018
assessment of microleakage of class v restored by resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer and pit and fissure resin-based sealants following er:yag laser conditioning and acid etching: in vitro study
;Luong E;Shayegan A
Vol. Volume 10 , pp. 83-92
274 views Abstract
2013
effect of lip position and gingival display on smile and esthetics as perceived by college students with different educational backgrounds
;Zawawi KH;Malki GA;Al-Zahrani MS;Alkhiary YM
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 77-80
266 views Abstract
2014
a comparison of the treatment effects of the forsus fatigue resistance device and the twin block appliance in patients with class ii malocclusions
;Hanoun A;Al-Jewair TS;Tabbaa S;Allaymouni MA;Preston CB
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 57-63
256 views Abstract
2020
Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science
Meteyard, L.
Vol. 112 , pp. 0-0
215 views DOI
2016
abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options
;Nascimento MM;Dilbone DA;Pereira PN;Duarte WR;Geraldeli S;Delgado AJ
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 79-87
197 views Abstract
2020
Production without rules: Using an instance memory model to exploit structure in natural language
Johns, B.T.
Vol. 115 , pp. 0-0
95 views DOI
2020
Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science
Meteyard, L.
Vol. 112 , pp. 0-0
215 views DOI
2019
Individual differences in subphonemic sensitivity and phonological skills.
Li, Monica Y C;Braze, David;Kukona, Anuenue;Johns, Clinton L;Tabor, Whitney;Van Dyke, Julie A;Mencl, W Einar;Shankweiler, Donald P;Pugh, Kenneth R;Magnuson, James S;
Vol. 107 , pp. 195-215
311 views DOI Abstract
2019
The role of prior knowledge in incremental associative learning: An empirical and computational approach
Bein, O.
Vol. 107 , pp. 1-24
303 views DOI
2019
A computational model of reading across development: Effects of literacy onset on language processing
Chang, Y.
Vol. 108 , pp. 0-0
511 views DOI
2018
assessment of microleakage of class v restored by resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer and pit and fissure resin-based sealants following er:yag laser conditioning and acid etching: in vitro study
;Luong E;Shayegan A
Vol. Volume 10 , pp. 83-92
274 views Abstract
2017
quality of oral surgery referrals and how to improve them
;Bjorkeborn M;Nilsson H;Anderud J
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 111-116
284 views Abstract
2016
abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options
;Nascimento MM;Dilbone DA;Pereira PN;Duarte WR;Geraldeli S;Delgado AJ
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 79-87
197 views Abstract
2015
calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor associated with an odontome – a diverse lesion encountered
;Radheshyam C;Alokenath B;Kumar H;Abikshyeet P
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 91-95
97 views Abstract
2015
guided bone augmentation using ceramic space-maintaining devices: the impact of chemistry
;Anderud J;Abrahamsson P;Jimbo R;Isaksson S;Adolfsson E;Malmström J;Naito Y;Wennerberg A
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 45-53
104 views Abstract
Journament Score
30.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #19,574 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

30.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

66.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

10.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

1.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

65.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.