journal of memory and language | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3989 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of memory and language

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name j mem lang
Abbreviated Name journal of memory and language
ISSN 0749-596X
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jml
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2019
A computational model of reading across development: Effects of literacy onset on language processing
Chang, Y.
Vol. 108 , pp. 0-0
482 views DOI
2019
Individual differences in subphonemic sensitivity and phonological skills.
Li, Monica Y C;Braze, David;Kukona, Anuenue;Johns, Clinton L;Tabor, Whitney;Van Dyke, Julie A;Mencl, W Einar;Shankweiler, Donald P;Pugh, Kenneth R;Magnuson, James S;
Vol. 107 , pp. 195-215
286 views DOI Abstract
2019
The role of prior knowledge in incremental associative learning: An empirical and computational approach
Bein, O.
Vol. 107 , pp. 1-24
281 views DOI
2018
assessment of microleakage of class v restored by resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer and pit and fissure resin-based sealants following er:yag laser conditioning and acid etching: in vitro study
;Luong E;Shayegan A
Vol. Volume 10 , pp. 83-92
255 views Abstract
2009
evolution of photography in maxillofacial surgery: from analog to 3d photography – an overview
;Heidrun Schaaf;Christoph Yves Malik;Hans-Peter Howaldt;et al
Vol. 2009 , No. default , pp. 39-45
254 views Abstract
2013
effect of lip position and gingival display on smile and esthetics as perceived by college students with different educational backgrounds
;Zawawi KH;Malki GA;Al-Zahrani MS;Alkhiary YM
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 77-80
242 views Abstract
2017
quality of oral surgery referrals and how to improve them
;Bjorkeborn M;Nilsson H;Anderud J
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 111-116
237 views Abstract
2014
a comparison of the treatment effects of the forsus fatigue resistance device and the twin block appliance in patients with class ii malocclusions
;Hanoun A;Al-Jewair TS;Tabbaa S;Allaymouni MA;Preston CB
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 57-63
236 views Abstract
2020
Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science
Meteyard, L.
Vol. 112 , pp. 0-0
181 views DOI
2016
abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options
;Nascimento MM;Dilbone DA;Pereira PN;Duarte WR;Geraldeli S;Delgado AJ
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 79-87
163 views Abstract
View All 14 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.