european journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of european oncology nursing society | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4557 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
32
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
48
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

european journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of european oncology nursing society

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name eur j oncol nurs
Abbreviated Name eur j oncol nurs
ISSN 1532-2122
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/european-journal-of-oncology-nursing
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (44 total)

2019
Exploring the impact of lymphoedema on individuals and if lymphatic venous anastomosis surgery effects perceptions on quality of life: A qualitative study.
Thomas, Melanie;Coveney, Elizabeth;Pike, Cheryl;Morgan, Karen;Noble-Jones, Rhian;
Vol. 44 , pp. 101720
449 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing oncology nurses' attitudes towards death and the prevalence of burnout: A cross-sectional study.
Guo, Qiaohong;Zheng, Ruishuang;
Vol. 42 , pp. 69-75
432 views DOI Abstract
2019
Roles of biological and psychosocial factors in experiencing a psychoneurological symptom cluster in cancer patients.
Kim, Hee-Ju;Malone, Patrick S;
Vol. 42 , pp. 97-102
414 views DOI Abstract
2019
Enhancing the cancer caregiving experience: Building resilience through role adjustment and mutuality.
Gibbons, Susanne W;Ross, Alyson;Wehrlen, Leslie;Klagholz, Stephen;Bevans, Margaret;
Vol. 43 , pp. 101663
405 views DOI Abstract
2020
A nurse-led self-management support intervention for patients and informal caregivers facing incurable cancer: A feasibility study from the perspective of nurses.
Slev, Vina N;Molenkamp, Cornelia M;Eeltink, Corien M;Roeline W Pasman, H;Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M;Francke, Anneke L;van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F;
Vol. 45 , pp. 101716
404 views DOI Abstract
mapping of flood susceptibility in campina grande county - pb: a spatial multicriteria approach
;Priscila Barros Ramalho Alves;Hiran de Melo Filho;Bárbara Barbosa Tsuyuguchi;Iana Alexandra Alves Rufino;Patrícia Hermínio Cunha Feitosa
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 28-43
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Long-term treatment for emotional distress in women with breast cancer.
Sanchez, Leticia;Fernandez, Nelida;Calle, Angela P;Ladera, Valentina;Casado, Ines;Sahagun, Ana M;
Vol. 42 , pp. 126-133
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
Correlates of life-support treatment preferences among low-income home-based cancer management recipients.
Kim, JinShil;Heo, Seongkum;Kim, Mi Yeong;Park, Eun Young;Seo, Eun Ju;Lee, Mee Ok;Jeong, Bo Yoon;Lee, Jung-Ah;
Vol. 43 , pp. 101665
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
An outreach telephone program for advanced melanoma supportive care: Acceptability and feasibility.
Fox, Jennifer;Janda, Monika;Bennett, Fiona;Langbecker, Danette;
Vol. 42 , pp. 110-115
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
Associations of health belief and health literacy with Pap smear practice among Asian immigrant women.
Eo, Yong-Sook;Kim, Ji-Soo;
Vol. 42 , pp. 63-68
335 views DOI Abstract
View All 44 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
32
35
30
40
48
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

48.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.