Indexed in Journament

european journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of european oncology nursing society

ISSN 1532-2122· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #19,989 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
44 Articles
Scores higher than 31.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name eur j oncol nurs
Abbreviated Name eur j oncol nurs
ISSN 1532-2122
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/european-journal-of-oncology-nursing

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 24.3
Content Distribution 42.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 24.3 13.4
Content Distribution 42.5 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (44)

2019
Exploring the impact of lymphoedema on individuals and if lymphatic venous anastomosis surgery effects perceptions on quality of life: A qualitative study.
Thomas, Melanie;Coveney, Elizabeth;Pike, Cheryl;Morgan, Karen;Noble-Jones, Rhian;
Vol. 44 , pp. 101720
484 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing oncology nurses' attitudes towards death and the prevalence of burnout: A cross-sectional study.
Guo, Qiaohong;Zheng, Ruishuang;
Vol. 42 , pp. 69-75
466 views DOI Abstract
2019
Roles of biological and psychosocial factors in experiencing a psychoneurological symptom cluster in cancer patients.
Kim, Hee-Ju;Malone, Patrick S;
Vol. 42 , pp. 97-102
451 views DOI Abstract
2019
Enhancing the cancer caregiving experience: Building resilience through role adjustment and mutuality.
Gibbons, Susanne W;Ross, Alyson;Wehrlen, Leslie;Klagholz, Stephen;Bevans, Margaret;
Vol. 43 , pp. 101663
446 views DOI Abstract
2020
A nurse-led self-management support intervention for patients and informal caregivers facing incurable cancer: A feasibility study from the perspective of nurses.
Slev, Vina N;Molenkamp, Cornelia M;Eeltink, Corien M;Roeline W Pasman, H;Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M;Francke, Anneke L;van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F;
Vol. 45 , pp. 101716
438 views DOI Abstract
2019
Long-term treatment for emotional distress in women with breast cancer.
Sanchez, Leticia;Fernandez, Nelida;Calle, Angela P;Ladera, Valentina;Casado, Ines;Sahagun, Ana M;
Vol. 42 , pp. 126-133
426 views DOI Abstract
mapping of flood susceptibility in campina grande county - pb: a spatial multicriteria approach
;Priscila Barros Ramalho Alves;Hiran de Melo Filho;Bárbara Barbosa Tsuyuguchi;Iana Alexandra Alves Rufino;Patrícia Hermínio Cunha Feitosa
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 28-43
419 views DOI Abstract
2019
Correlates of life-support treatment preferences among low-income home-based cancer management recipients.
Kim, JinShil;Heo, Seongkum;Kim, Mi Yeong;Park, Eun Young;Seo, Eun Ju;Lee, Mee Ok;Jeong, Bo Yoon;Lee, Jung-Ah;
Vol. 43 , pp. 101665
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
An outreach telephone program for advanced melanoma supportive care: Acceptability and feasibility.
Fox, Jennifer;Janda, Monika;Bennett, Fiona;Langbecker, Danette;
Vol. 42 , pp. 110-115
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development and implementation strategies of a nurse-led symptom self-management program in outpatient cancer centres: The Symptom Navi© Programme.
Bana, Marika;Ribi, Karin;Kropf-Staub, Susanne;Näf, Ernst;Schramm, Monique Sailer;Zürcher-Florin, Sabin;Peters, Solange;Eicher, Manuela;
Vol. 44 , pp. 101714
374 views DOI Abstract
2020
A nurse-led self-management support intervention for patients and informal caregivers facing incurable cancer: A feasibility study from the perspective of nurses.
Slev, Vina N;Molenkamp, Cornelia M;Eeltink, Corien M;Roeline W Pasman, H;Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M;Francke, Anneke L;van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F;
Vol. 45 , pp. 101716
438 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exploring the impact of lymphoedema on individuals and if lymphatic venous anastomosis surgery effects perceptions on quality of life: A qualitative study.
Thomas, Melanie;Coveney, Elizabeth;Pike, Cheryl;Morgan, Karen;Noble-Jones, Rhian;
Vol. 44 , pp. 101720
484 views DOI Abstract
2019
Developing and testing a theory-driven e-learning intervention to equip healthcare professionals to communicate with parents impacted by parental cancer.
Semple, Cherith Jane;McCaughan, Eilis;
Vol. 41 , pp. 126-134
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development and implementation strategies of a nurse-led symptom self-management program in outpatient cancer centres: The Symptom Navi© Programme.
Bana, Marika;Ribi, Karin;Kropf-Staub, Susanne;Näf, Ernst;Schramm, Monique Sailer;Zürcher-Florin, Sabin;Peters, Solange;Eicher, Manuela;
Vol. 44 , pp. 101714
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Enhancing the cancer caregiving experience: Building resilience through role adjustment and mutuality.
Gibbons, Susanne W;Ross, Alyson;Wehrlen, Leslie;Klagholz, Stephen;Bevans, Margaret;
Vol. 43 , pp. 101663
446 views DOI Abstract
2019
Correlates of life-support treatment preferences among low-income home-based cancer management recipients.
Kim, JinShil;Heo, Seongkum;Kim, Mi Yeong;Park, Eun Young;Seo, Eun Ju;Lee, Mee Ok;Jeong, Bo Yoon;Lee, Jung-Ah;
Vol. 43 , pp. 101665
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Roles of biological and psychosocial factors in experiencing a psychoneurological symptom cluster in cancer patients.
Kim, Hee-Ju;Malone, Patrick S;
Vol. 42 , pp. 97-102
451 views DOI Abstract
2019
Long-term treatment for emotional distress in women with breast cancer.
Sanchez, Leticia;Fernandez, Nelida;Calle, Angela P;Ladera, Valentina;Casado, Ines;Sahagun, Ana M;
Vol. 42 , pp. 126-133
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
An outreach telephone program for advanced melanoma supportive care: Acceptability and feasibility.
Fox, Jennifer;Janda, Monika;Bennett, Fiona;Langbecker, Danette;
Vol. 42 , pp. 110-115
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Feeling excluded and not having anyone to talk to: Qualitative study of interpersonal relationships following a cancer diagnosis in a sibling.
Toft, Teolinda;Alfonsson, Sven;Hovén, Emma;Carlsson, Tommy;
Vol. 42 , pp. 76-81
280 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #19,989 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

31.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

24.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

42.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.