Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1069 / 33,968
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name J Cancer Educ
Abbreviated Name j cancer educ
ISSN 1543-0154
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/13187
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2019
Rural Caregivers' Willingness for Community Pharmacists to Administer the HPV Vaccine to Their Age-Eligible Children.
Koskan, Alexis M;Dominick, Lauren N;Helitzer, Deborah L;
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Experience of Chemotherapy Teaching and Readability of Chemotherapy Educational Materials for Women with Breast Cancer.
Parker, Pearman D;Heiney, Sue P;Friedman, Daniela B;Adams, Swann Arp;Dawson, Robin M;
350 views DOI Abstract
2020
A Brief Educational Intervention Enhances Basic Cancer Literacy Among Kentucky Middle and High School Students.
Hudson, Lauren;Samons, Kerrigan M;Dicken, Haley E;Prichard, Chris;Weiss, L Todd;Edward, Jean;Vanderpool, Robin C;Vanderford, Nathan L;
322 views DOI Abstract
2019
Increasing Undergraduate Exposure to Oncology: the Role of Oncology Interest Groups.
Sherwood, Marissa;Rioux, Danielle;Knight, Rosalinda;LeBlanc, Max;Betsch, Taylor;Giuliani, Meredith;Caissie, Amanda;
295 views DOI Abstract
2019
Acceptance of Self-Sampling Among Long-Term Cervical Screening Non-Attenders with HPV-Positive Results: Promising Opportunity for Specific Cancer Education.
Andersson, Sonia;Belkić, Karen;Mints, Miriam;Östensson, Ellinor;
295 views DOI Abstract
2018
Training Primary Health Professionals in Breast Cancer Prevention: Evidence and Experience from Mexico.
Magaña-Valladares, Laura;González-Robledo, María Cecilia;Rosas-Magallanes, Cynthia;Mejía-Arias, Miguel Ángel;Arreola-Ornelas, Héctor;Knaul, Felicia M;
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 160-166
290 views DOI Abstract
2009
混成學習對大學生研究計畫寫作態度、寫作品質與班級氣氛的影響 the effect of blended learning on research proposal writing attitude, classroom climate, and quality in research proposal writing class of undergraduates
;張玉茹 Yu-Ju Chang
Vol. 54 , No. 1 , pp. 143-177
286 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development and Usability Testing of a Decision Support App for Women Considering Breast Reconstruction Surgery.
Lin, Pin-Jun;Fang, Su-Ying;Kuo, Yao-Lung;
285 views DOI Abstract
2017
大學教師職級、主持研發計畫數與研究產能關聯性之探討：以一所私立醫學大學為例 relationships among academic ranks, numbers of funded projects, and research productivity of university faculty: the case of a private medical university
;黃淑玲 Sheila Shu-Ling Huang;沈碩彬 Shuo-Pin Shen
Vol. 62 , No. 4 , pp. 89-115
278 views DOI Abstract
2020
Dominican Provider Practices for Cervical Cancer Screening in Santo Domingo and Monte Plata Provinces.
Liebermann, Erica;Hammer, Marilyn J;Gúzman, Natalia Frías;Van Devanter, Nancy;Ompad, Danielle;
261 views DOI Abstract
View All 13 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.