Indexed in Journament

CBE life sciences education

ISSN 1931-7913· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,724 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
17 Articles
Scores higher than 5.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name CBE Life Sci Educ
Abbreviated Name cbe life sci educ
ISSN 1931-7913
URL http://www.lifescied.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 25.5 31.2
Community Impact 19.3 13.4
Content Distribution 70.3 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2019
The Impact of a Pedagogy Course on the Teaching Beliefs of Inexperienced Graduate Teaching Assistants.
Lee, Star W;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. ar5
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identifying Faculty and Peer Interaction Patterns of First-Year Biology Doctoral Students: A Latent Class Analysis.
Jeong, Soojeong;Blaney, Jennifer M;Feldon, David F;
Vol. 18 , No. 4 , pp. ar59
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills Reveals That Fundamental Literacy Is an Important Contributor to Scientific Literacy.
Shaffer, Justin F;Ferguson, Julie;Denaro, Kameryn;
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. ar31
346 views DOI Abstract
2018
Trust, growth mindset, and student commitment to active learning in a college science course
Cavanagh, A.
Vol. 17 , pp. 0-0
337 views DOI
2019
Exploring the impact of formal internships on biomedical graduate and postgraduate careers: An interview study
Chatterjee, D.
Vol. 18 , pp. 0-0
336 views DOI
2019
Seductive Details in the Flipped Classroom: The Impact of Interesting but Educationally Irrelevant Information on Student Learning and Motivation.
Maloy, Jeffrey;Fries, Laura;Laski, Frank;Ramirez, Gerardo;
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. ar42
326 views DOI Abstract
2018
A community-building framework for collaborative research coordination across the education and biology research disciplines
Pelaez, N.
Vol. 17 , pp. 0-0
325 views DOI
2020
Peer Leader Reflections on Promoting Discussion in Peer Group-Learning Sessions: Reflective and Practiced Advice through Collaborative Annual Peer-Advice Books
Szteinberg, G.
Vol. 19 , pp. ar2
318 views DOI
2015
Flipped-class pedagogy enhances student metacognition and collaborative-learning strategies in higher education but effect does not persist
Van, Vliet E.
Vol. 14 , pp. 1-10
309 views DOI
2018
Supporting the writing productivity of biomedical graduate students: An integrated, structured writing intervention
Gardner, S.
Vol. 17 , pp. 0-0
307 views DOI
2020
Finding a Fit: Biological Science Doctoral Students' Selection of a Principal Investigator and Research Laboratory.
Maher, Michelle A;Wofford, Annie M;Roksa, Josipa;Feldon, David F;
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. ar31
68 views DOI Abstract
2020
Peer Leader Reflections on Promoting Discussion in Peer Group-Learning Sessions: Reflective and Practiced Advice through Collaborative Annual Peer-Advice Books
Szteinberg, G.
Vol. 19 , pp. ar2
318 views DOI
2019
Identifying Faculty and Peer Interaction Patterns of First-Year Biology Doctoral Students: A Latent Class Analysis.
Jeong, Soojeong;Blaney, Jennifer M;Feldon, David F;
Vol. 18 , No. 4 , pp. ar59
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Impact of a Pedagogy Course on the Teaching Beliefs of Inexperienced Graduate Teaching Assistants.
Lee, Star W;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. ar5
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Seductive Details in the Flipped Classroom: The Impact of Interesting but Educationally Irrelevant Information on Student Learning and Motivation.
Maloy, Jeffrey;Fries, Laura;Laski, Frank;Ramirez, Gerardo;
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. ar42
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exploring the impact of formal internships on biomedical graduate and postgraduate careers: An interview study
Chatterjee, D.
Vol. 18 , pp. 0-0
336 views DOI
2019
Use of the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills Reveals That Fundamental Literacy Is an Important Contributor to Scientific Literacy.
Shaffer, Justin F;Ferguson, Julie;Denaro, Kameryn;
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. ar31
346 views DOI Abstract
2018
Trust, growth mindset, and student commitment to active learning in a college science course
Cavanagh, A.
Vol. 17 , pp. 0-0
337 views DOI
2018
Supporting the writing productivity of biomedical graduate students: An integrated, structured writing intervention
Gardner, S.
Vol. 17 , pp. 0-0
307 views DOI
2018
A community-building framework for collaborative research coordination across the education and biology research disciplines
Pelaez, N.
Vol. 17 , pp. 0-0
325 views DOI
Journament Score
25.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,724 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

25.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

25.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

19.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.