CoDAS | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3241 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

CoDAS

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj
Short Name Codas
Abbreviated Name codas
ISSN 2317-1782
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2019
Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure (GASP): clinical markers of the development of auditory recognition and comprehension abilities in children using cochlear implants.
Silva, Bárbara Cristiane Sordi;Moret, Adriane Lima Mortari;Silva, Leandra Tabanez do Nascimento;Costa, Orozimbo Alves da;Alvarenga, Kátia de Freitas;Silva-Comerlatto, Mariane Perin da;
Vol. 31 , No. 4 , pp. e20180142
488 views DOI Abstract
2019
Drama students with and without vocal complaint: vocal health and hygiene data, symptoms and voice handicap.
Cruz, Maria Rita Dos Santos Amarante;Yamasaki, Rosiane;Pacheco, Claudia;Borrego, Maria Cristina de Menezes;Behlau, Mara;
Vol. 31 , No. 5 , pp. e20180319
415 views DOI Abstract
2019
Tutoring effects in the narrative skills of typically developing children.
Silveira, Heloisa Gonçalves da;Brocchi, Beatriz Servilha;Perissinoto, Jacy;Puglisi, Marina Leite;
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. e20180022
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Training of early childhood teachers for the use of successful shared reading strategies.
Menotti, Ana Rubia Saes;Domeniconi, Camila;Costa, Aline Roberta Aceituno da;
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. e20180294
397 views DOI Abstract
2015
the church, gender and aids: what's wrong with patriarchy?
;Pillay, Miranda
Vol. 43 , No. 3 , pp. 558-567
334 views DOI Abstract
2017
Violence in schools and the voice of teachers.
Dornelas, Rodrigo;Santos, Thaynara Alves Dos;Oliveira, Daniela Sena de;Irineu, Roxane de Alencar;Brito, Aline;Silva, Kelly;
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. e20170053
333 views DOI Abstract
2016
O trabalho fonoaudiológico em uma clínica dialógica bilíngue: estudo de caso
Mariani, Beatriz Zaki Porcelli;Guarinello, Ana Cristina;Massi, Giselle;Tonocchi, Rita;Berberian, Ana Paula;
Vol. 28 , No. 5 , pp. 653-660
323 views Abstract
0000
Communication difficulties perceived by parents of children with developmental disorders
Sun, Ingrid Ya I;Fernandes, Fernanda Dreux Miranda;
Vol. 26 , No. 4 , pp. 270-275
315 views Abstract
2019
Evidence of orofacial myofunctional therapy patients with asthma and rhinitis: a systematic review.
Araújo, Brenda Carla Lima;Simões, Silvia de Magalhães;Moreira, Marcela Gama Santana;Mendes, Amanda Louize Félix;Martins-Filho, Paulo Ricardo Saquete;
Vol. 31 , No. 4 , pp. e20190009
279 views DOI Abstract
2021
Treatment clinical trial - three types - for children with fluency disorders and stuttering.
Ávila, Nathalia Dos Santos Fernandes de;Juste, Fabiola;Costa, Julia Biancalana;Andrade, Claudia Regina Furquim de;
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. e20200264
275 views DOI Abstract
View All 13 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.