contemporary clinical trials | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2031 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

contemporary clinical trials

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name contemp clin trials
Abbreviated Name contemp clin trials
ISSN 1559-2030
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/contemporary-clinical-trials
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2019
CHAMP: A cluster randomized-control trial to prevent obesity in child care centers.
Armstrong, Bridget;Trude, Angela C B;Johnson, Candace;Castelo, Romulus J;Zemanick, Amy;Haber-Sage, Sophie;Arbaiza, Raquel;Black, Maureen M;
, pp. 105849
434 views DOI Abstract
2019
Proactive text messaging (GetReady2Quit) and nicotine replacement therapy to promote smoking cessation among smokers in primary care: A pilot randomized trial protocol.
Kruse, G R;Park, E;Haberer, J E;Abroms, L;Shahid, N N;Howard, S E;Chang, Y;Haas, J S;Rigotti, N A;
Vol. 80 , pp. 48-54
407 views DOI Abstract
2019
MIND food and speed of processing training in older adults with low education, the MINDSpeed Alzheimer's disease prevention pilot trial.
Clark, Daniel O;Xu, Huiping;Moser, Lyndsi;Adeoye, Philip;Lin, Annie W;Tangney, Christy C;Risacher, Shannon L;Saykin, Andrew J;Considine, Robert V;Unverzagt, Frederick W;
Vol. 84 , pp. 105814
389 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rationale, design, and development of SleepWell24: A smartphone application to promote adherence to positive airway pressure therapy among patients with obstructive sleep apnea.
Petrov, Megan E;Hasanaj, Kristina;Hoffmann, Coles M;Epstein, Dana R;Krahn, Lois;Park, John G;Hollingshead, Kevin;Yu, Tsung-Yen;Todd, Michael;St Louis, Erik K;Morgenthaler, Timothy I;Buman, Matthew P;
Vol. 89 , pp. 105908
370 views DOI Abstract
2020
Physical activity across the curriculum (PAAC3): Testing the application of technology delivered classroom physical activity breaks.
Szabo-Reed, Amanda N;Washburn, Richard A;Greene, J Leon;Ptomey, Lauren T;Gorczyca, Anna;Lee, Robert H;Little, Todd D;Lee, Jaehoon;Honas, Jeff;Donnelly, Joseph E;
, pp. 105952
338 views DOI Abstract
2020
High-dose rifapentine with or without moxifloxacin for shortening treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: Study protocol for TBTC study 31/ACTG A5349 phase 3 clinical trial.
Dorman, Susan E;Nahid, Payam;Kurbatova, Ekaterina V;Goldberg, Stefan V;Bozeman, Lorna;Burman, William J;Chang, Kwok-Chiu;Chen, Michael;Cotton, Mark;Dooley, Kelly E;Engle, Melissa;Feng, Pei-Jean;Fletcher, Courtney V;Ha, Phan;Heilig, Charles M;Johnson, John L;Lessem, Erica;Metchock, Beverly;Miro, Jose M;Nhung, Nguyen Viet;Pettit, April C;Phillips, Patrick P J;Podany, Anthony T;Purfield, Anne E;Robergeau, Kathleen;Samaneka, Wadzanai;Scott, Nigel A;Sizemore, Erin;Vernon, Andrew;Weiner, Marc;Swindells, Susan;Chaisson, Richard E;, ;
Vol. 90 , pp. 105938
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
Intervention Comparative Effectiveness for Adult Cognitive Training (ICE-ACT) Trial: Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics.
Yoon, Jong-Sung;Roque, Nelson A;Andringa, Ronald;Harrell, Erin R;Lewis, Katharine G;Vitale, Thomas;Charness, Neil;Boot, Walter R;
Vol. 78 , pp. 76-87
290 views DOI Abstract
2017
Financial incentives for diabetes prevention in a Medicaid population: Study design and baseline characteristics.
Desai, Jay;Taylor, Gretchen;Vazquez-Benitez, Gabriela;Vine, Sara;Anderson, Julie;Garrett, Joyce E;Gilmer, Todd;Vue-Her, Houa;Schiff, Jeff;Rinn, Sarah;Engel, Katelyn;Michael, Amy;O'Connor, Patrick J;
Vol. 53 , pp. 1-10
288 views DOI Abstract
2019
A survey of informed consents from FDA's center for devices and radiological health.
Santel, Fabienne;Bah, Isatu;Kim, Katherine;Lin, Ja-An;McCracken, Jack;Teme, Adaeze;
, pp. 105831
267 views DOI Abstract
2014
bindings and covers of cyrillic old printed editions of holy dormition pochayiv lavra publishing house
;Zheleznyak O.
, No. 18 , pp. 72-80
264 views Abstract
View All 14 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.