Indexed in Journament

contemporary clinical trials

ISSN 1559-2030· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.7/100
Journament Score
#4,650
Journament Rank
14
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name contemp clin trials
Abbreviated Name contemp clin trials
ISSN 1559-2030
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/contemporary-clinical-trials

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (14)

2019
CHAMP: A cluster randomized-control trial to prevent obesity in child care centers.
, pp. 105849
467 views DOI Abstract
2019
Proactive text messaging (GetReady2Quit) and nicotine replacement therapy to promote smoking cessation among smokers in primary care: A pilot randomized trial protocol.
Vol. 80 , pp. 48-54
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
MIND food and speed of processing training in older adults with low education, the MINDSpeed Alzheimer's disease prevention pilot trial.
Vol. 84 , pp. 105814
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rationale, design, and development of SleepWell24: A smartphone application to promote adherence to positive airway pressure therapy among patients with obstructive sleep apnea.
Vol. 89 , pp. 105908
398 views DOI Abstract
2020
Physical activity across the curriculum (PAAC3): Testing the application of technology delivered classroom physical activity breaks.
, pp. 105952
365 views DOI Abstract
2020
High-dose rifapentine with or without moxifloxacin for shortening treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: Study protocol for TBTC study 31/ACTG A5349 phase 3 clinical trial.
Vol. 90 , pp. 105938
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Intervention Comparative Effectiveness for Adult Cognitive Training (ICE-ACT) Trial: Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics.
Vol. 78 , pp. 76-87
327 views DOI Abstract
2017
Financial incentives for diabetes prevention in a Medicaid population: Study design and baseline characteristics.
Vol. 53 , pp. 1-10
314 views DOI Abstract
2019
A survey of informed consents from FDA's center for devices and radiological health.
, pp. 105831
284 views DOI Abstract
2020
Identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation patients using a machine learning risk prediction algorithm and diagnostic testing (PULsE-AI): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
, pp. 106191
259 views DOI Abstract
2020
High-dose rifapentine with or without moxifloxacin for shortening treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: Study protocol for TBTC study 31/ACTG A5349 phase 3 clinical trial.
Vol. 90 , pp. 105938
345 views DOI Abstract
2020
Physical activity across the curriculum (PAAC3): Testing the application of technology delivered classroom physical activity breaks.
, pp. 105952
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Intervention Comparative Effectiveness for Adult Cognitive Training (ICE-ACT) Trial: Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics.
Vol. 78 , pp. 76-87
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rationale, design, and development of SleepWell24: A smartphone application to promote adherence to positive airway pressure therapy among patients with obstructive sleep apnea.
Vol. 89 , pp. 105908
398 views DOI Abstract
2019
MIND food and speed of processing training in older adults with low education, the MINDSpeed Alzheimer's disease prevention pilot trial.
Vol. 84 , pp. 105814
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Proactive text messaging (GetReady2Quit) and nicotine replacement therapy to promote smoking cessation among smokers in primary care: A pilot randomized trial protocol.
Vol. 80 , pp. 48-54
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
CHAMP: A cluster randomized-control trial to prevent obesity in child care centers.
, pp. 105849
467 views DOI Abstract
2019
A survey of informed consents from FDA's center for devices and radiological health.
, pp. 105831
284 views DOI Abstract
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

41.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.