jmir serious games | Journament

Journal Ranking

#43 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
45.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

jmir serious games

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name jmir serious games
Abbreviated Name jmir serious games
ISSN 2291-9279
Aim and Scope
URL https://games.jmir.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

2021
The co.LAB Generic Framework for Collaborative Design of Serious Games: Development Study
Maxence Laurent;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. e28674-
392 views DOI Abstract
2021
A Gamification Framework for Cognitive Assessment and Cognitive Training: Qualitative Study
Mohammad Amin Mahdavi;
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. e21900-
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Title Correction: Younger Adolescents' Perceptions of Physical Activity, Exergaming, and Virtual Reality: Qualitative Intervention Development Study.
Faric, Nuša;Yorke, Eleanor;Varnes, Laura;Newby, Katie;Potts, Henry Ww;Smith, Lee;Hon, Adrian;Steptoe, Andrew;Fisher, Abigail;
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. e15657
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
An Interactive Mobile App Game to Address Aggression (RegnaTales): Pilot Quantitative Study.
Ong, Jeffrey G;Lim-Ashworth, Nikki S;Ooi, Yoon P;Boon, Jillian S;Ang, Rebecca P;Goh, Dion H;Ong, Say H;Fung, Daniel S;
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. e13242
349 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Web-Based Serious Game for Health to Reduce Perioperative Anxiety and Pain in Children (CliniPup): Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Buffel, Connor;van Aalst, June;Bangels, Anne-Marie;Toelen, Jaan;Allegaert, Karel;Verschueren, Sarah;Vander Stichele, Geert;
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. e12431
348 views DOI Abstract
2021
Standardizing the Development of Serious Games for Physical Rehabilitation: Conceptual Framework Proposal
Rafael Torres-Rosas;
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. e25854-
331 views DOI Abstract
2021
Developing Adaptive Serious Games for Children With Specific Learning Difficulties: A Two-phase Usability and Technology Acceptance Study
Elif Surer;
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. e25997-
324 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of Full Body Exergaming in Virtual Reality on Cardiovascular and Muscular Parameters: Cross-Sectional Experiment.
Feodoroff, Boris;Konstantinidis, Ippokratis;Froböse, Ingo;
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. e12324
318 views DOI Abstract
2017
Examining Motivations to Play Pokémon GO and Their Influence on Perceived Outcomes and Physical Activity.
Marquet, Oriol;Alberico, Claudia;Adlakha, Deepti;Hipp, J Aaron;
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. e21
302 views DOI Abstract
2016
electronic support tools for identification and management of rice weeds in africa for better-informed agricultural change agents
;Rodenburg Jonne;Le Bourgeois Thomas;Grard Pierre;Carara Alain;Irakiza Runyambo;Makokha Derek Wambulwa;Kabanyoro Ruth;Dzomeku Israel;Chiconela Tomas;Malombe Itambo;Sarra Soungalo;Ekeleme Friday;Mariko Mariame;Andrianaivo Alain Paul;Marnotte Pascal
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 15006-
267 views DOI Abstract
View All 12 Articles
45
Overall
Below Average
30
50
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

45.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.