Indexed in Journament

health and technology

ISSN 2190-7188· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,172 of 29,298 scored journals (34,018 indexed)
20 Articles
Scores higher than 65.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name health technol (berl)
Abbreviated Name health and technology
ISSN 2190-7188
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/12553

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for health and technology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 31.1 25.9
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.1 5.6
Content Distribution 73.8 89.4
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (20)

2018
kuwaiti youth attitudes toward archaeology
, No. 47 , pp. -
387 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Inadequacy of Regulatory Frameworks in Time of Crisis and in Low-Resource Settings: Personal Protective Equipment and COVID-19.
, pp. 1-9
365 views DOI Abstract
2007
editorial
, No. 22 , pp. -
348 views DOI Abstract
2005
geoarchaeological observations on the roman town of ammaia
, No. 19 , pp. -
342 views DOI Abstract
2009
bits and pieces: early bronze age stone bracers from ireland
, No. 26 , pp. -
331 views DOI Abstract
2012
2017
saving treasures of the world heritage at the digital archive dans
, No. 43 , pp. -
318 views DOI Abstract
2007
review of the architecture of mud and qudad dvds
, No. 20 , pp. -
306 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Inadequacy of Regulatory Frameworks in Time of Crisis and in Low-Resource Settings: Personal Protective Equipment and COVID-19.
, pp. 1-9
365 views DOI Abstract
2018
putting the palaeolithic into worcestershire's her: an evidence base for development management
, pp. -
214 views DOI Abstract
2018
kuwaiti youth attitudes toward archaeology
, No. 47 , pp. -
387 views DOI Abstract
2017
saving treasures of the world heritage at the digital archive dans
, No. 43 , pp. -
318 views DOI Abstract
2016
coinage and collapse? the contribution of numismatic data to understanding the end of roman britain
, No. 41 , pp. -
255 views DOI Abstract
2015
a new record of pre-columbian engravings in urubici (sc), brazil using polynomial texture mapping
, No. 38 , pp. -
208 views DOI Abstract
2014
direct evidence for bottom-fishing in archaeological whelks (buccinum undatum)
, No. 37 , pp. -
201 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,172 of 29,298 scored
(34,018 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

34.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

31.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.