European journal of sport science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#315 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 17 hours ago

European journal of sport science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Eur J Sport Sci
Abbreviated Name eur j sport sci
ISSN 1536-7290
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tejs20/current
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2020
High-level Athletes' Motivation for Sport and Susceptibility to Doping: The Mediating Role of Eating Behaviours.
Scoffier-Mériaux, Stéphanie;d'Arripe-Longueville, Fabienne;Woodman, Tim;Lentillon-Kaestner, Vanessa;Corrion, Karine;
, pp. 1-25
372 views DOI Abstract
2019
Expression levels of selected cytokines and microRNAs in response to vitamin D supplementation in ultra-marathon runners.
Pastuszak-Lewandoska, D;Domańska-Senderowska, D;Kiszałkiewicz, J;Szmigielska, P;Snochowska, A;Ratkowski, W;Spieszny, M;Klocek, T;Godlewski, P;Cięszczyk, P;Brzeziańska-Lasota, E;September, A V;Laguette, M J;
, pp. 1-10
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of mental fatigue on passing decision-making performance in professional soccer athletes.
Gantois, Petrus;Caputo Ferreira, Maria Elisa;Lima-Junior, Dalton de;Nakamura, Fábio Y;Batista, Gilmário Ricarte;Fonseca, Fabiano S;de Sousa Fortes, Leonardo;
, pp. 1-21
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Short term effects of a weight loss and healthy lifestyle programme for overweight and obese men delivered by German football clubs.
Pietsch, Benjamin;Weisser, Burkhard;Hanewinkel, Reiner;Gray, Cindy;Hunt, Kate;Wyke, Sally;Morgenstern, Matthis;
, pp. 1-35
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Oculomotor dynamics in skilled soccer players: The effects of sport expertise and strenuous physical effort.
Zwierko, Teresa;Jedziniak, Wojciech;Florkiewicz, Beata;Stępiński, Miłosz;Buryta, Rafał;Kostrzewa-Nowak, Dorota;Nowak, Robert;Popowczak, Marek;Woźniak, Jarosław;
Vol. 19 , No. 5 , pp. 612-620
280 views DOI Abstract
2016
centrality measures for immunization of weighted networks
;Mohammad Khansari;Amin Kaveh;Zainabolhoda Heshmati, et al.
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 12-27
277 views Abstract
2020
Effect of minimalist and maximalist shoes on impact loading and footstrike pattern in habitual rearfoot strike trail runners: An in-field study.
Mo, Shiwei;Chan, Zoe Y S;Lai, Kenneth K Y;Chan, Peter Pak-Kwan;Wei, Rachel Xiao-Yu;Yung, Patrick Shu-Hang;Shum, Gary;Cheung, Roy Tsz-Hei;
, pp. 1-9
241 views DOI Abstract
2014
meta-analysis of cancer transcriptomes: a new approach to uncover molecular pathological events in different cancer tissues
;Sundus Iqbal;Hira Ejaz;Muhammad Sulaman Nawaz, et al.
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 1-20
229 views Abstract
2012
identification of crucial nodes in biological networks
;DeWu Ding
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 118-120
227 views Abstract
2013
selforganizology: a science that deals with self-organization
;WenJun Zhang
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 1-14
221 views Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.