iafor journal of ethics, religion & philosophy | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5290 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

iafor journal of ethics, religion & philosophy

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name iafor journal of ethics, religion & philosophy
Abbreviated Name iafor journal of ethics, religion & philosophy
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (41 total)

2015
female sexual distress in infertile turkish women
;Serdar Aydın;Nihan Kurt;Selen Mandel;Mustafa Arda Kaplan;Nilay Karaca;Ramazan Dansuk
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. 205-210
642 views DOI Abstract
2010
our results with uterus-preserving abdominal approach and simultaneous anti-incontinence surgery in the management of advanced uterovaginal prolapse
;Fikret Fatih Önol;Hasan Sağlam;Egemen Avcı;Arif Serhan Cevrioğlu
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 125-132
505 views Abstract
2016
vitamin d deficiency in pregnancy is not associated with diabetes mellitus development in pregnant women at low risk for gestational diabetes
;Mehmet Bal;Gülçin Sahin Ersoy;Ömer Demirtas;Sefa Kurt;Abdullah Tasyurt
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 23-26
391 views DOI Abstract
2018
the impact of different 75 g oral glucose tolerance test target ranges within normal limits on neonatal outcomes: a validation study
;Seda Subaş;Gökçe Anık İlhan;Zehra Meltem Pirimoğlu
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 8-11
360 views DOI Abstract
2017
Postmodern Shakespeare: Thinking Through Hamlet’s Subversive Character
Huang, Yu-min;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 4-24
287 views Abstract
2007
helicobacter pylori seropositivity in patients with hyperemesis gravidarum in lakes region
;Mehmet Güney;Baha Oral;Murat Bulut;Tamer Mungan
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 28-32
285 views Abstract
2015
gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triggering of oocyte maturation in assisted reproductive technology cycles
;Engin Türkgeldi;Lale Türkgeldi;Ayşe Seyhan;Barış Ata
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 96-101
282 views DOI Abstract
2016
severe methotrexate toxicity after treatment for ectopic pregnancy: a case report
;Sunullah Soysal;Gökçe Anık İlhan;Mehmet Vural;Begüm Yıldızhan
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 221-223
268 views DOI Abstract
2005
cmv by rt-pcr in prenatal diagnosis the detection of cmv in amniotic fluid and cervicovaginal smear samples by real-time pcr assay in prenatal diagnosis
;Aydan Biri;Gulendam Bozdayi;Banu Çiftçi;Bora Dogan;Aysegul Yüce;Seyyal Rota;Ozdemir Himmetoglu
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 69-75
255 views
2017
the incidence, risk factors, and mortality of preterm neonates: a prospective study from jordan (2012-2013)
;Nadin M. Abdel Razeq;Yousef S. Khader;Anwar M. Batieha
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 28-36
247 views DOI Abstract
View All 41 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.