Psychiatria Danubina | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2283 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
29
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Psychiatria Danubina

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name Psychiatr Danub
Abbreviated Name psychiatr danub
ISSN 0353-5053
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.hdbp.org/psychiatria_danubina/index.html
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (32 total)

2019
Services for patients with intellectual disability and mental health problems in Poland.
Krysta, Krzysztof;Krysta, Janina;Szczegielniak, Anna;Krzystanek, Marek;
Vol. 31 , No. Suppl 3 , pp. 534-542
346 views Abstract
2019
The "Imperfect Beauty" in Eating Disorders.
Juli, Maria Rosaria;
Vol. 31 , No. Suppl 3 , pp. 447-451
343 views Abstract
2019
The Relation Between Emotional Intelligence and Internet Addiction in Katowice High School Students.
Mizera, Szymon;Jastrzębska, Karolina;Cyganek, Tomasz;Bąk, Aleksandra;Michna, Magda;Stelmach, Anna;Krysta, Krzysztof;Krzystanek, Marek;Janas-Kozik, Małgorzata;
Vol. 31 , No. Suppl 3 , pp. 568-573
342 views Abstract
2019
The Humor in Therapy: the Healing Power of Laughter.
Amici, Patrizia;
Vol. 31 , No. Suppl 3 , pp. 503-508
329 views Abstract
central european high-resolution gridded daily data sets (hyras): mean temperature and relative humidity
;Claudia Frick;Heiko Steiner;Alex Mazurkiewicz;Ulf Riediger;Monika Rauthe;Thomas Reich;Annegret Gratzki
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 15-32
327 views DOI Abstract
2018
EMDR Psychotherapy in Work with Youth As Part of the Peacebuilding Activities: Case Study of the Interfaith Workshop in Bosnia and Herzegovina - Case Reports.
Hasandedić-Đapo, Lejla;
Vol. 30 , No. Suppl 5 , pp. 282-285
324 views
2017
From conflict and misunderstanding to respect.
Cvitković, Ivan;
Vol. 29 Suppl 1 , pp. 58-63
317 views Abstract
2019
Eating Disorders: the Role of Childhood Trauma and the Emotion Dysregulation.
Brustenghi, Filippo;Mezzetti, Francesca Alice Fiore;Di Sarno, Cristina;Giulietti, Cecilia;Moretti, Patrizia;Tortorella, Alfonso;
Vol. 31 , No. Suppl 3 , pp. 509-511
309 views Abstract
2018
statistical analysis of contrail lifetimes from a satellite perspective
;Klaus Gierens;Margarita Vázquez-Navarro
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 183-193
294 views DOI Abstract
2019
The emotional and psychological burden of the "burnout" in families of psychiatric patients.
Franza, Francesco;
Vol. 31 , No. Suppl 3 , pp. 438-442
285 views Abstract
View All 32 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
29
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

29.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.