scientific electronic archives | Journament

Journal Ranking

#270 / 33,855
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

scientific electronic archives

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name scientific electronic archives
Abbreviated Name scientific electronic archives
ISSN 2316-9281
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (94 total)

2016
epidemiological study of smoking prevalence among teenagers
;A.A. Fialkovskaia
Vol. 11 , No. 7.75 , pp. 112-116
522 views DOI Abstract
2017
modern problems of treatment of helicobacter-associated diseases in children: opportunities of adjuvant therapy
;O.Yu. Belousova;N.V. Pavlenko;K.V. Voloshin;K.V. Savytska;O.L. Slobodianiuk
Vol. 12 , No. 2.1 , pp. 239-248
353 views DOI Abstract
2018
Doses and sources of phosphorus in maize with and without polymer coating in thhe mono-ammnnium phosphate
Fiorini, I. V. A.;Pinho, R. G. V.;Pereira, H. D.;Pereira, C. S.;Resende, F. R.;Resende, E. L.;
Vol. 5 , No. 11 , pp. 89-93
336 views Abstract
2016
the effectiveness of herbion iceland moss syrup in the treatment of dry cough in children
;S.L. Niankovskyi;M.S. Yatsula;I.V. Babik;V.B. Yaskiv;O.I. Shpychka;B.V. Yandio
Vol. 11 , No. 7.75 , pp. 41-46
312 views DOI Abstract
2018
Influence of organic fertilization on growth and productivity of mini pumpkin
Cigel, C.;Vieira, G.;Silva, V. N.;
Vol. 11 , No. 5 , pp. 6-13
298 views Abstract
2014
characteristic of local humoral factors of nonspecific resistance in children with recurrent respiratory infections
;Yu.V. Marushko;O.S. Movchan
Vol. 9 , No. 2.53 , pp. 9-13
290 views DOI Abstract
2013
factors of innate and adaptive local immunity in children with primary deficiencies of antibody formation
;L.I. Chernyshova;S.A. Yakymovych;A.V. Chernyshov;B.V. Donskoy;L.V. Stamboli
Vol. 8 , No. 7.50 , pp. 9-12
290 views DOI Abstract
2013
the choice of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated forms of bacterial respiratory diseases in children
;Ye.I. Yulish;O.Ye. Chernyshova;Ye.V. Glinskaya
Vol. 8 , No. 1.44 , pp. 91-96
273 views DOI Abstract
2018
gastrointestinal symptoms in children with acute neuroinfections
;A.I. Markov;S.O. Kramarov
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 123-128
270 views DOI Abstract
2015
clinical and diagnostic features of bronchial asthma in children on the background of latent food allergy
;V.M. Levytskyi;E.V. Yurchyshena;O.M. Yurchyshen;L.V. Mysko;Yu.L. Mysko
Vol. 10 , No. 6.66 , pp. 15-18
261 views DOI Abstract
View All 94 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.