Indexed in Journament

journal of biomedical materials research part b, applied biomaterials

ISSN 1552-4981· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #15,596 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
20 Articles
Scores higher than 46.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j biomed mater res b appl biomater
Abbreviated Name j biomed mater res part b appl biomater
ISSN 1552-4981
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1552-4981

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of biomedical materials research part b, applied biomaterials
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 17.1 5.8
Content Distribution 76.1 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (20)

2017
Evaluation of egg white ovomucin-based porous scaffold as an implantable biomaterial for tissue engineering.
Vol. 105 , No. 7 , pp. 2107-2117
453 views DOI Abstract
2016
A novel liposomal drug delivery system for PMMA bone cements.
Vol. 104 , No. 8 , pp. 1510-1524
431 views DOI Abstract
2020
Mechanical and degradation properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) cement/borate bioactive glass composites.
430 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dual growth factor delivery using PLGA nanoparticles in silk fibroin/PEGDMA hydrogels for articular cartilage tissue engineering.
419 views DOI Abstract
2015
tobacco and alcohol use among male dental and medical students studying in davangere city: a cross-sectional survey
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 156-160
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bioactive glass and high-intensity lasers as a promising treatment for dentin hypersensitivity: An in vitro study.
389 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hot isostatic pressure treatment of 3D printed Ti6Al4V alters surface modifications and cellular response.
374 views DOI Abstract
2018
Alternative plasticizer, 4-cyclohexene-1,2-dicarboxylic acid dinonyl ester, for blood containers with protective effects on red blood cells and improved cold resistance.
Vol. 106 , No. 3 , pp. 1052-1063
356 views DOI Abstract
2015
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of doxycycline-chondroitin sulfate/PCLmicrospheres for intraarticular treatment of osteoarthritis.
Vol. 103 , No. 6 , pp. 1238-48
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fracture toughness and crack resistance curves of acrylic bone cements.
321 views DOI Abstract
2020
2020
Ultrahigh packing density next generation microtube array membrane: A novel solution for absorption-based extracorporeal endotoxin removal device.
203 views DOI Abstract
2020
Mechanical and degradation properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) cement/borate bioactive glass composites.
430 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fracture toughness and crack resistance curves of acrylic bone cements.
321 views DOI Abstract
2019
Influence of liner offset and locking mechanism on fatigue durability in highly cross-linked polyethylene total hip prostheses.
238 views DOI Abstract
2019
Dual growth factor delivery using PLGA nanoparticles in silk fibroin/PEGDMA hydrogels for articular cartilage tissue engineering.
419 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bioactive glass and high-intensity lasers as a promising treatment for dentin hypersensitivity: An in vitro study.
389 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hot isostatic pressure treatment of 3D printed Ti6Al4V alters surface modifications and cellular response.
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
A novel "turn-on" fluorescent sensor for hydrogen peroxide based on oxidized porous g-C N nanosheets.
301 views DOI Abstract
2018
acuity of morality in dental practice management
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 3-6
258 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #15,596 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

17.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

76.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.