journal of big data | Journament

Journal Ranking

#452 / 33,826
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

journal of big data

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj
Short Name j big data
Abbreviated Name journal of big data
ISSN 2196-1115
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (64 total)

2019
Uncertainty in big data analytics: survey, opportunities, and challenges
Hariri, Reihaneh H.;Fredericks, Erik M.;Bowers, Kate M.;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-16
800 views Abstract
2019
The intrinsically linked future for human and Artificial Intelligence interaction
Miller A.
Vol. 6 , pp. 0-0
362 views DOI
2019
The anatomy of the data-driven smart sustainable city: instrumentation, datafication, computerization and related applications
Bibri, S.
Vol. 6 , pp. 0-0
340 views DOI
2020
A comparative dimensionality reduction study in telecom customer segmentation using deep learning and PCA
Alkhayrat, M.
Vol. 7 , pp. 0-0
330 views DOI
2019
Knowledge discovery from a more than a decade studies on healthcare Big Data systems: a scientometrics study
Soleimani-Roozbahani, F.
Vol. 6 , pp. 0-0
282 views DOI
2019
Correction to: A novel adaptable approach for sentiment analysis on big social data (Journal of Big Data, (2018), 5, 1, (12), 10.1186/s40537-018-0120-0)
El, Alaoui I.
Vol. 6 , pp. 0-0
274 views DOI
2019
Big data analytics: a link between knowledge management capabilities and superior cyber protection
Obitade, P.
Vol. 6 , pp. 0-0
273 views DOI
2004
structure des noyaux a deux nucleons de valence pres des regions de l’etain et du plomb
;F BENRACHI;M BOUHELAL;M RAMDHANE;S HARRAT
, No. 22 , pp. 2-6
272 views Abstract
2020
Anomaly detection in business processes using process mining and fuzzy association rule learning
Sarno, R.
Vol. 7 , pp. 0-0
264 views DOI
2020
Toward multi-label sentiment analysis: a transfer learning based approach
Tao, J.
Vol. 7 , pp. 0-0
257 views DOI
View All 64 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.