children and society | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5168 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

children and society

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name children and society
Abbreviated Name children and society
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (30 total)

2016
molecular genetics of mycobacterium tuberculosis resistant to aminoglycosides and cyclic peptide testing by mtbdrsl in armenia
;Hasmik Margaryan;Parissa Farnia;Armen Hayrapetyan;Alvard Mirzoyan
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. 159-160
436 views DOI Abstract
2015
evaluation of p2x7 and ifn-γ gene polymorphisms in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis using pcr-rflp method
;Mahdi Shamsi;Mohammad Reza Zolfaghari;Parissa Farnia
Vol. 4 , No. 5 , pp. 130-130
325 views Abstract
2016
interferon-gamma release assays and tuberculin skin testing for diagnosing latent mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in at-risk groups in poland
;Katarzyna Kruczak;Lucyna Mastalerz;Krzysztof Sładek
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 27-33
292 views DOI Abstract
2018
effect of chlorine on mycobacterium gordonae and mycobacterium chubuense in planktonic and biofilm state
;Alejandra Soledad Oriani;Fermín Sierra;Mónica Diana Baldini
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 122-127
289 views DOI Abstract
2015
mdr-tb in belarus, the role of outpatient care strengthening and social support
;Alena Skrahina;Valiantsin Rusovich;Masoud Dara;Liudmila Zhylevich;Hennadz Hurevich
Vol. 4 , No. 5 , pp. 79-79
279 views Abstract
2016
modulation of cd4 and cd8 response to quantiferon-tb plus in patients with active tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis infection followed over time during treatment
;Teresa Chiacchio;Elisa Petruccioli;Ilaria Pepponi;Valentina Vanini;Gina Gualano;Daniela Cirillo;Fabrizio Palmieri;Giuseppe Ippolito;Delia Goletti
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. 141-142
272 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Challenges Facing Children Reunified With Their Families From an Orphanage in Ghana
Frimpong-Manso, K.
Vol. 33 , pp. 363-376
268 views DOI
2016
importance of the α10 helix for devr activation: a road map for screening inhibitors against devr-mediated dormancy of mycobacterium tuberculosis
;Atul Vashist;D Prithvi Raj;Umesh Datta Gupta;Rajiv Bhat;Jaya Sivaswami Tyagi
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. 92-93
260 views DOI Abstract
2018
utilization of molecular and conventional methods for the identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from different water sources
;Claudia Andrea Tortone;Martín José Zumárraga;Andrea Karina Gioffr;Delia Susana Oriani
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 53-60
253 views DOI Abstract
2018
a comparison of intradermal test with recombinant tuberculosis allergen (diaskintest) with other immunologic tests in the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection
;Anna Starshinova;Viacheslav Zhuravlev;Irina Dovgaluk;Alexandr Panteleev;Vera Manina;Ulia Zinchenko;Evgenia Istomina;Maria Pavlova;Piotr Yablonskiy
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 32-39
251 views DOI Abstract
View All 30 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.