children and youth services review | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1148 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

children and youth services review

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim soc
Short Name child youth serv rev
Abbreviated Name children and youth services review
ISSN 0190-7409
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/children-and-youth-services-review
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2019
Supporting Adolescents to Adhere (SATA): Lessons learned from an intervention to achieve medication adherence targets among youth living with HIV in Uganda.
MacCarthy, Sarah;Mendoza-Graf, Alexandra;Huang, Haijing;Mukasa, Barbara;Linnemayr, Sebastian;
Vol. 102 , pp. 56-62
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ostracism and aggression among adolescents: Implicit theories of personality moderated the mediating effect of self-esteem
Li, S.
Vol. 100 , pp. 105-111
330 views DOI
2019
The impact of classroom climate on students' perception of social exclusion in secondary special education
Beld, M.
Vol. 103 , pp. 127-134
319 views DOI
2019
The romantic relationships of those who have experienced adoption or foster care: A meta-analysis
DeLuca, Bishop H.
Vol. 105 , pp. 0-0
315 views DOI
2020
Key variations in organizational culture and leadership influence: A comparison between three children's mental health and child welfare agencies
Vito, R.
Vol. 108 , pp. 0-0
279 views DOI
2019
Why Does Child Maltreatment Occur? Caregiver Perspectives and Analyses of Neighborhood Structural Factors Across Twenty Years.
Gross-Manos, Daphna;Haas, Bridget M;Richter, Francisca;Korbin, Jill E;Coulton, Claudia J;Crampton, David;Spilsbury, James C;
Vol. 99 , pp. 138-145
277 views DOI Abstract
2019
The association between mother's socioeconomic status and non-orphan kinship care arrangements in South Africa
De, Wet N.
Vol. 103 , pp. 79-86
276 views DOI
2018
Child abuse and neglect in orphanages in EAST JAVA Province (Study on forms of child abuse, anticipatory efforts developed children and the role of the orphanage)
Sutinah
Vol. 93 , pp. 24-29
274 views DOI
2019
Increasing trend in the risk of suicide among residential care children and adolescents in South Korea
Kim, H.
Vol. 105 , pp. 0-0
263 views DOI
2012
Characteristics of incarcerated fathers and mothers: Implications for preventive interventions targeting children and families
Kjellstrand, J.
Vol. 34 , pp. 2409-2415
260 views DOI
View All 20 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.