Indexed in Journament

primates; journal of primatology

ISSN 1610-7365· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #16,965 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
49 Articles
Scores higher than 42.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name primates
Abbreviated Name primates
ISSN 1610-7365

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 11.1
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 65.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility — 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 11.1 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 2.9 5.8
Content Distribution 65.5 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (49)

2018
response of treatment in patients with primary headaches and hypertension: a prospective observational pilot study
;Abdullah Cüneyt Hocagil;Hilal Hocagil;Volkan Ülker
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 32-37
428 views DOI Abstract
2010
the effect of mannitol treatment on renal functions in acute stroke
;Neslihan Eşkut;Çağla Filiz;Ufuk Şener;Metin Murat Özçelik;Nazif Çalış;Yaşar Zorlu
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 102-105
425 views Abstract
2010
primary and secondary intracranial hypotension: clinical, mri and radioisotope cisternography findings
;Naime Altınkaya;Tülin Yıldırım;Deniz Yerdelen;Başak Karakurum;Ali Fuat Yapar;Özlem Alkan
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 78-85
422 views Abstract
2008
what day is today? time orientation in healthy people
;Çiğdem Kudiaki;Aslı Aslan
Vol. 14 , No. 5 , pp. 333-337
362 views Abstract
2008
effectivity of theophylline in post-dural puncture headache (results of 5 cases)
;Ufuk Ergün;Bahar Say;Ayla Bozbaş;Özcan Kocatürk;Levent İnan
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 33-36
358 views Abstract
2017
reliability and validity of the turkish version of the barnes akathisia rating scale
;Ece Bayram;Hafize Çotur Levent;Sabiha Tezcan;Müge Kuzu;Muhittin Cenk Akbostancı
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 56-59
354 views DOI Abstract
2017
a case of neuro-aids presenting with rapidly progressive dementia and parkinsonism with rapid response to treatment
;Yasemin Akıncı;Melis Sohtaoğlu Sevindik;Bilgül Mete;Umran Şumeyse Ertürk;Mehmet Yürüyen;Bekir Sami Kocazeybek;Melda Bozluolcay
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 81-83
352 views DOI
2011
the comparison of continuous and intermittent enteral nutrition in cerebrovascular patients
;Levent Güngör;Leyla Özeke;Yakup Türkel;Ufuk Sandıkçı
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 76-82
351 views Abstract
2017
quality of life, coping, and social support in patients with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study
;Oğuzhan Zengin;Ercüment Erbay;Buğra Yıldırım;Özgür Altındağ
Vol. 23 , No. 4 , pp. 211-218
343 views DOI Abstract
2009
paraneoplastic encephalitis associated with anti-ma2 antibodies and mesothelioma-like poorly differentiated lung cancer
;Can Ebru Bekircan;Amber Eker;Öztürk Ateş;Kader Karlı Oğuz
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 98-101
329 views Abstract
2019
Reaction to allospecific death and to an unanimated gorilla infant in wild western gorillas: insights into death recognition and prolonged maternal carrying.
Masi, Shelly;
305 views DOI Abstract
2019
Social relationships and caregiving behavior between recently orphaned chimpanzee siblings.
Reddy, Rachna B;Mitani, John C;
317 views DOI Abstract
2018
a case of acute bilateral ptosis: surf-1 mutation
;Özge Dedeoğlu;Deniz Yüksel;Çiğdem Genç Sel;Mustafa Kılıç;Kader Karlı Oğuz;Beril Talim
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 83-85
179 views DOI
2018
high-resolution thin-section t2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging sequence as a diagnostic aid in hemifacial spasm
;Venkatraman Indiran;Amish Aggarwal
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 88-89
94 views DOI
2018
neural foundations of action-related language: studies in parkinson’s disease
;Ece Bayram;Muhittin Cenk Akbostancı
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 3-12
175 views DOI Abstract
2018
response of treatment in patients with primary headaches and hypertension: a prospective observational pilot study
;Abdullah Cüneyt Hocagil;Hilal Hocagil;Volkan Ülker
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 32-37
428 views DOI Abstract
2018
dysarthria-clumsy hand syndrome due to rostral pontine infarct
;Halil Önder
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 81-82
139 views DOI
2018
efficacy of focused ultrasound thalamotomy in essential tremor
;Halil Önder
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 103-104
290 views DOI
2017
acute spinal pseudoathetosis
;Mehmet Fevzi Öztekin;Dilara Mermi Dibek
Vol. 23 , No. 4 , pp. 248-249
27 views DOI
2017
one-year risk of stroke after transient ischemic attack or minor stroke
;Mustafa Karaoğlan
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 144-145
243 views DOI
Journament Score
30.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #16,965 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

30.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

65.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.