frontiers in neurorobotics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4770 / 33,982
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 19 hours ago

frontiers in neurorobotics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name front neurorobot
Abbreviated Name front neurorobot
ISSN 1662-5218
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.frontiersin.org/neurorobotics
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (124 total)

2014
effect of ultrasound combined with determination of ca19-9 and hs-crp on the accuracy of early diagnosis of gallbladder cancer
;Hang-yu ZHANG;Ke-feng DOU
Vol. 39 , No. 3 , pp. 222-225
755 views Abstract
2011
influential factors for short-term prognosis of patients with acute cerebral infarction:a logistic regression analysis
;Yuan-qi ZHAO;Ying-yan LIAN;Gui-fu LI;Da-rong WU;Min ZHAO;Ye-feng CAI;Jian-wen GUO
Vol. 36 , No. 3 , pp. 265-268
612 views Abstract
2016
a comparison of curative efficacy meeting the milan criteria between surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation therapy for treatment of primary liver cancer
;Bing WANG;Jia JIA;Shao-geng ZHANG;Ling-xiang YU;Hui-jun ZHU;Ji-tao WANG;Bai-jun SUN
Vol. 41 , No. 3 , pp. 221-226
580 views Abstract
2013
expression of irx2 in primary hepatocellular carcinoma
;Shuang YU;Jing WANG;Bin DONG;Yi-xi BAO
Vol. 38 , No. 3 , pp. 185-189
549 views Abstract
2015
clinical efficacy of breast-conserving surgery combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer: a report of 81 cases
;Zhi-yu CAO;Jian-miao HE;Bo YANG;Qing-jun ZHANG;Hua-zhou ZHAO;Xin-hui ZHANG;Rui-jun LIU;Yu-qi SHI;Yong-shen SUN
Vol. 40 , No. 6 , pp. 488-491
443 views Abstract
2016
effect of radiofrequency ablation on mirna expression in coronary sinus blood of patients with atrial fibrillation
;Li-cheng LEI;Yu-xia CUI;Gui-yu XU;Nan-nan ZHAO;Ru-peng WANG;Yu-nan YUE;Shui-xiang YANG
Vol. 41 , No. 10 , pp. 819-826
429 views Abstract
2019
Integrative Biomimetics of Autonomous Hexapedal Locomotion
Dürr, Volker;Dürr, Volker;Arena, Paolo P.;Cruse, Holk;Dallmann, Chris J.;Dallmann, Chris J.;Drimus, Alin;Hoinville, Thierry;Hoinville, Thierry;Krause, Tammo;Mátéfi-Tempfli, Stefan;Paskarbeit, Jan;Patanè, Luca;Schäffersmann, Mattias;Schilling, Malte;Schmitz, Josef;Schmitz, Josef;Strauss, Roland;Theunissen, Leslie;Theunissen, Leslie;Vitanza, Alessandra;Schneider, Axel;Schneider, Axel;
Vol. 13 , pp. -
383 views Abstract
2011
predictive value of fibroscan on liver ascites cause by cirrhosis
;Ping HAN;Dong JI;Jian ZHANG;Fan LI;Bing LI;Qing SHAO;Guo-feng CHEN
Vol. 36 , No. 11 , pp. 1143-1144
376 views Abstract
2013
the mechanism of ligand-independent activation of estrogen receptor in letrozole-resistant breast cancer cells
;Hong-yan CHEN;Zhi-hua LIU
Vol. 38 , No. 6 , pp. 461-466
374 views Abstract
2019
Neuromorphic Vision Datasets for Pedestrian Detection, Action Recognition, and Fall Detection.
Miao, Shu;Chen, Guang;Ning, Xiangyu;Zi, Yang;Ren, Kejia;Bing, Zhenshan;Knoll, Alois;
Vol. 13 , pp. 38
373 views DOI
View All 124 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.