Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4608 / 33,981
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Scand J Med Sci Sports
Abbreviated Name scand j med sci sports
ISSN 1600-0838
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/16000838
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (27 total)

2019
Effect of beta -adrenergic agonist and resistance training on maximal oxygen uptake and muscle oxidative enzymes in men.
Lemminger, Anders Krogh;Jessen, Søren;Habib, Sajad;Onslev, Johan;Xu, Stella Feng Sheng;Backer, Vibeke;Bangsbo, Jens;Hostrup, Morten;
553 views DOI Abstract
2015
the effect of progressive muscle relaxation on pregnant women's general health
;Azam Sadeghi;Masoud Sirati-Nir;Abbas Ebadi;Matin Aliasgari;Zahra Hajiamini
Vol. 20 , No. 6 , pp. 655-660
499 views DOI Abstract
2018
the effects of motivational interviewing on the health status of patients undergoing hemodialysis
;Alireza Dashtidehkordi;Nahid Shahgholian;Jahangir Maghsoudi;Jaleh Sadeghian
Vol. 23 , No. 4 , pp. 287-291
472 views DOI Abstract
2016
effect of cognitive behavioral stress management program on psychosomatic patients′ quality of life
;Zahra Ghazavi;Esmat Rahimi;Mohsen Yazdani;Hamid Afshar
Vol. 21 , No. 5 , pp. 510-515
454 views DOI Abstract
2017
the application of the transtheoretical model to identify physical activity behavior in women
;Asiyeh Pirzadeh;Firoozeh Mostafavi;Fazlollah Ghofarnipour;Marjan Mansourian
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. 299-302
413 views DOI Abstract
2016
nurses' human dignity in education and practice: an integrated literature review
;Akram Parandeh;Morteza Khaghanizade;Eesa Mohammadi;Jamileh Mokhtari-Nouri
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 1-8
369 views DOI Abstract
2016
association between nurses' personality characteristics and their attitude toward the older adults
;Arsalan Yazdanian;Mousa Alavi;Alireza Irajpour;Mahrokh Keshvari
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 9-13
366 views DOI Abstract
2018
neonatal intensive care nursing curriculum challenges based on context, input, process, and product evaluation model: a qualitative study
;Mansoureh Ashghali-Farahani;Fatemeh Ghaffari;Sara-Sadat Hoseini-Esfidarjani;Zahra Hadian;Robabeh Qomi;Helen Dargahi
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 111-118
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multigenerational performance development of male and female top-elite swimmers - A global study of the 100m freestyle event.
Post, Aylin K;Koning, Ruud H;Visscher, Chris;Elferink-Gemser, Marije T;
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of active video games on children and adolescents: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Oliveira, Crystian B;Pinto, Rafael Z;Saraiva, Bruna T C;Tebar, William R;Delfino, Leandro D;Franco, Marcia R;Silva, Claudiele C M;Christofaro, Diego G D;
326 views DOI Abstract
View All 27 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.