Indexed in Journament

Frontiers in psychology

ISSN 1664-1078· EN

Journal Website Guide for Authors Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
53.9 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #10 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
510 Articles
Scores higher than 99.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
Short Name Front Psychol
Abbreviated Name fronpsych
ISSN 1664-1078
URL https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology#
Author Instructions https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology#about

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 32.6 30.4
Accessibility 45.0 20.4
Timeliness 60.0 5.8
Diversity 72.7 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 20.0 5.8
Content Distribution 72.7 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (510)

2019
Online Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Personalized Teaching and Learning: The eDia System.
Csapó, Benő;Molnár, Gyöngyvér;
Vol. 10 , pp. 1522
784 views DOI Abstract
2018
Leaders’ Gender, Perceived Abusive Supervision and Health
Stempel, Christiane R.;Rigotti, Thomas;
Vol. 9 , pp. -
717 views Abstract
2019
The Impact of Self-Relevance on Preschool Children's Sharing.
Zhang, Wenjie;Xiang, Songmei;Dai, Hongmei;Ren, Mengmeng;Shen, Yuqi;Fan, Wei;Zhong, Yiping;
Vol. 10 , pp. 1028
675 views DOI Abstract
Corrigendum: Spiritual Leadership on Proactive Workplace Behavior: The Role of Organizational Identification and Psychological Safety.
Chen, Silu;Jiang, Wanxing;Zhang, Guanglei;Chu, Fulei;
Vol. 10 , pp. 2056
665 views DOI Abstract
2018
Confronting a Paradox: A New Perspective of the Impact of Uncertainty in Suspense.
Delatorre, Pablo;León, Carlos;Salguero, Alberto;Palomo-Duarte, Manuel;Gervás, Pablo;
Vol. 9 , pp. 1392
639 views DOI Abstract
2019
Young, Bullying, and Connected. Common Pathways to Cyberbullying and Problematic Internet Use in Adolescence.
Brighi, Antonella;Menin, Damiano;Skrzypiec, Grace;Guarini, Annalisa;
Vol. 10 , pp. 1467
636 views DOI Abstract
2019
Looking for Age Differences in Self-Driving Vehicles: Examining the Effects of Automation Reliability, Driving Risk, and Physical Impairment on Trust.
Rovira, Ericka;McLaughlin, Anne Collins;Pak, Richard;High, Luke;
Vol. 10 , pp. 800
635 views DOI Abstract
2019
How Artificial Intelligence Can Help Us Understand Human Creativity.
Gobet, Fernand;Sala, Giovanni;
Vol. 10 , pp. 1401
621 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Endurance and Contestations of Colonial Constructions of Race Among Malaysians and Singaporeans.
Reddy, Geetha;Gleibs, Ilka H;
Vol. 10 , pp. 792
613 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Background Structure of Entrepreneurial Team and Strategic Investment Decisions: A Collective Psychological Capital Perspective.
Guo, Li Xin;Lu, Kun-Hwa;Cheng, Ya-Fang;Liu, Chi-Fang;
Vol. 10 , pp. 1416
588 views DOI Abstract
2025
Comparing chatbots to psychometric tests in hiring: reduced social desirability bias, but lower predictive validity.
Dukanovic, Danilo; Krpan, Dario
Vol. 16 , pp. 1564979
104 views DOI Abstract
2025
The ART of resilience: a theoretical bridge across resilience perspectives.
Farchi, Moshe U; Peled-Avram, Maya
Vol. 16 , pp. 1556047
110 views DOI Abstract
2025
The glass ceiling perception and female teacher burnout: the mediating role of work-family conflict.
Wei, Yun; Subramaniam, Geetha; Wang, Xueshen
Vol. 16 , pp. 1551903
122 views DOI Abstract
2024
A structural equation model of online learning: investigating self-efficacy, informal digital learning, self-regulated learning, and course satisfaction
Yi Zheng; Ao Xiao
64 views DOI Abstract
2024
Variables with a negative impact on the quality of life of gays and lesbians in Spain: evaluation of homophobic and lesbophobic indicators to guide youth education.
García-Sánchez, José-Rufino;Gago-Valiente, Francisco-Javier;López-López, María-José;Segura-Camacho, Adrián;Saenz-de-la-Torre, Luis-Carlos;Moreno-Sánchez, Emilia;
Vol. 15 , pp. 1323208
106 views DOI Abstract
2023
Academic word coverage and language difficulty of reading passages in College English Test and Test of English for Academic Purposes in China.
Liu, Huidan;Shi, Xiaomeng;Qiu, Jing;Shi, Ying;Hao, Yunhan;Zhu, Liya;Yan, Chengjie;Li, Huadong;
Vol. 14 , pp. 1171227
61 views DOI Abstract
2023
Read at home to do well at school: informal reading predicts achievement and motivation in English as a foreign language.
Meyer, Jennifer;Fleckenstein, Johanna;Krüger, Maleika;Keller, Stefan Daniel;Hübner, Nicolas;
Vol. 14 , pp. 1289600
96 views DOI Abstract
2023
Paths towards parenthood after repeated treatment failures: a comparative study on predictors of psychological health outcomes in infertile couples persisting in treatments or opting for adoption.
Zurlo, Maria Clelia;Cattaneo Della Volta, Maria Francesca;Vallone, Federica;
Vol. 14 , pp. 1147926
96 views DOI Abstract
2023
Comparison of behavioral activation/inhibition systems, emotional regulation difficulties, and selective attention in adolescents with and without parents
Sadeghzadeh, Zohreh;Bagheri, Fariborz;
Vol. 14 , pp. -
98 views DOI Abstract
2023
The "secrets" of English private tutoring in China: Chinese students' experiences of study abroad test preparation in cram schools.
Zhang, Cong;Zhang, Yi;Gao, Yun;
Vol. 14 , pp. 1120768
134 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
53.9/100 · Average
Ranked #10 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

53.9/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

32.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

45.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

72.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

20.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

72.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.