Indexed in Journament

current opinion in structural biology

ISSN 1879-033X· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
44.5 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #415 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
30 Articles
Scores higher than 98.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →
This journal has not been published yet.

About This Journal

Short Name curr opin struct biol
Abbreviated Name curr opin struct biol
ISSN 1879-033X
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/current-opinion-in-structural-biology

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 60.0 5.8
Diversity 55.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 10.7 5.8
Content Distribution 59.6 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (30)

2015
the development and validation of identification methods of loratadine tablets
;D. B. Korobko;O. B. Poliak;L. S. Logoida;N. O. Zarіvna;O. V. Sem’ianіv
, No. 1 , pp. 55-58
770 views DOI Abstract
2015
determination of biologically active compounds in lipophilic extracts of pumpkin using thin layer chromatography
;E. A. Degtyaryovа;V. A. Grudko;L. I. Vishnevskaya;E. I. Bisaga
, No. 2 , pp. 45-48
481 views DOI Abstract
2016
actoprotective activity of 5-(2-bromophenyl)-4-amino-4h-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione and its s-derivatives
;Ye. S. Pruglo
, No. 1 , pp. 67-70
419 views DOI Abstract
2016
experimental substantiation of effectively administration of vinboron for analgesic activity increase of ibuprofen
;F. V. Hladkykh ;N. H. Stepaniuk
, No. 3 , pp. 41-48
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Towards capture of dynamic assembly and action of the T3SS at near atomic resolution.
Hu, Jinhong;Worrall, Liam J;Strynadka, Natalie Cj;
Vol. 61 , pp. 71-78
392 views DOI Abstract
2016
the assessment of the morbidity with temporary disability of workers in the steel industry
;A. I. Sevalnev ;L. P. Sharavara
, No. 1 , pp. 83-86
392 views DOI Abstract
2017
synthesis, physical-chemical and biological properties of 7-benzyl-3-methyl-8-thioxanthine derivatives
;D. H. Ivanchenko;M. I. Romanenko;O. M. Kamyshnyi; N. M. Polishchuk;K. V. Aleksandrova
, No. 3 , pp. 272-277
371 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evolving understanding of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase structure, function, inhibition, and resistance.
Xavier Ruiz, Francesc;Arnold, Eddy;
Vol. 61 , pp. 113-123
368 views DOI Abstract
2015
Current structural biology of the heparin interactome.
Pomin, Vitor H;Mulloy, Barbara;
Vol. 34 , pp. 17-25
329 views DOI Abstract
2014
optimal particle size definition during cooperative extracting of different types of herbal raw materials which comprise into infusion composition «veneton»
;S. A. Kutsenko;O. V. Kutovaya;O. A. Ruban; I. V. Kovalevskaya
, No. 1 , pp. 31-34
319 views DOI Abstract
2025
Primed for degradation: How weak protein interactions enable molecular glue degraders.
Hanzl, Alexander; Inghelram, Clara; Schmitt, Stefan; Thomä, Nicolas H
Vol. 92 , pp. 103052
44 views DOI Abstract
2020
Intrinsic protein disorder and protein modifications in the processing of biological signals
Phillips, A.
Vol. 60 , pp. 1-6
148 views DOI
2020
Advances in molecular simulations of protein mechanical properties and function.
Franz, Florian;Daday, Csaba;Gräter, Frauke;
Vol. 61 , pp. 132-138
294 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evolving understanding of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase structure, function, inhibition, and resistance.
Xavier Ruiz, Francesc;Arnold, Eddy;
Vol. 61 , pp. 113-123
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Towards capture of dynamic assembly and action of the T3SS at near atomic resolution.
Hu, Jinhong;Worrall, Liam J;Strynadka, Natalie Cj;
Vol. 61 , pp. 71-78
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Molecular choreography of pre-mRNA splicing by the spliceosome.
Wan, Ruixue;Bai, Rui;Shi, Yigong;
Vol. 59 , pp. 124-133
244 views DOI Abstract
2018
spectrophotometric determination of xylometazoline in nasal drops
;А. О. Donchenko ;N. O. Nagorna;S. O. Vasyuk
, No. 2 , pp. 148-152
239 views DOI Abstract
2018
principle of patient's autonomy: problems of legal regulation in ukraine
;M. A. Anishchenko
, No. 2 , pp. 225-229
306 views DOI Abstract
2017
acute toxicity study of dermabin
;V. L. Karbovskyy;I. A. Shevchuk;O. V. Kurkina;T. Ye. Makovska
, No. 1 , pp. 116-120
226 views DOI Abstract
2017
heterocyclization reactions study of 3-thio and 3-thio-4-amino derivatives of 1,2,4–triazole
;O. A. Bihdan;O. I. Panasenko;Ye. G. Knysh;V. V. Parchenko
, No. 1 , pp. 90-97
107 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
44.5/100 · Below Average
Ranked #415 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

44.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

59.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.