european journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of arbeitsgemeinschaft fur pharmazeutische verfahrenstechnik ev | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4747 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

european journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of arbeitsgemeinschaft fur pharmazeutische verfahrenstechnik ev

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name eur j pharm biopharm
Abbreviated Name eur j pharm biopharm
ISSN 1873-3441
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.journals.elsevier.com/european-journal-of-pharmaceutics-and-biopharmaceutics
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2013
Lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles as a new generation therapeutic delivery platform: a review.
Hadinoto, Kunn;Sundaresan, Ajitha;Cheow, Wean Sin;
Vol. 85 , No. 3 Pt A , pp. 427-43
722 views DOI Abstract
2019
In vivo models and decision trees for formulation development in early drug development: A review of current practices and recommendations for biopharmaceutical development.
Zane, P;Gieschen, H;Kersten, E;Mathias, N;Ollier, C;Johansson, P;Van den Bergh, A;Van Hemelryck, S;Reichel, A;Rotgeri, A;Schäfer, K;Müllertz, A;Langguth, P;
Vol. 142 , pp. 222-231
493 views DOI Abstract
2019
Verapamil delivery systems on the basis of mesoporous ZSM-5/KIT-6 and ZSM-5/SBA-15 polymer nanocomposites as a potential tool to overcome MDR in cancer cells.
Popova, Margarita;Mihaylova, Rositsa;Momekov, Georgi;Momekova, Denitsa;Lazarova, Hristina;Trendafilova, Ivalina;Mitova, Violeta;Koseva, Neli;Mihályi, Judith;Shestakova, Pavletta;St Petkov, Petko;Aleksandrov, Hristiyan A;Vayssilov, Georgi N;Konstantinov, Spiro;Szegedi, Ágnes;
391 views DOI Abstract
2020
Preclinical evaluation of new formulation concepts for abiraterone acetate bioavailability enhancement based on the inhibition of pH-induced precipitation.
Boleslavská, Tereza;Světlík, Svatopluk;Žvátora, Pavel;Bosák, Jan;Dammer, Ondřej;Beránek, Josef;Kozlík, Petr;Křížek, Tomáš;Kutinová Canová, Nikolina;Šíma, Martin;Slanař, Ondřej;Štěpánek, František;
387 views DOI Abstract
2016
NIR hyperspectral imaging to evaluate degradation in captopril commercial tablets.
França, Leandro de Moura;Pimentel, Maria Fernanda;Simões, Simone da Silva;Grangeiro, Severino;Prats-Montalbán, José M;Ferrer, Alberto;
Vol. 104 , pp. 180-8
363 views DOI Abstract
2018
Microfluidic self-assembly of a combinatorial library of single- and dual-ligand liposomes for in vitro and in vivo tumor targeting.
Ran, Rui;Wang, Haofei;Liu, Yun;Hui, Yue;Sun, Qi;Seth, Arjun;Wibowo, David;Chen, Dong;Zhao, Chun-Xia;
Vol. 130 , pp. 1-10
341 views DOI Abstract
2020
Progress and perspectives of brain-targeting lipid-based nanosystems via the nasal route in Alzheimer's disease.
Akel, Hussein;Ismail, Ruba;Csóka, Ildikó;
308 views DOI Abstract
2019
Characterization of spray dried powders with nucleic acid-containing PEI nanoparticles.
Keil, Tobias W M;Feldmann, Daniel P;Costabile, Gabriella;Zhong, Qian;da Rocha, Sandro;Merkel, Olivia M;
307 views DOI Abstract
2019
A unified in vitro test system for the assessment of tight junction modulators.
Saaber, Daniel;Reichl, Stephan;
Vol. 142 , pp. 353-363
291 views DOI Abstract
2013
crítica a la enseñanza de estudios sociales desde los proyectos interdisciplinarios
;Robles Altamirano, Adriana Lourdes ; Valencia Medina, Elvia Marlene
Vol. 6 , No. 10 , pp. 20-24
235 views Abstract
View All 18 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.