Indexed in Journament

european journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of arbeitsgemeinschaft fur pharmazeutische verfahrenstechnik ev

ISSN 1873-3441· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,602 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
18 Articles
Scores higher than 36.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name eur j pharm biopharm
Abbreviated Name eur j pharm biopharm
ISSN 1873-3441
URL http://www.journals.elsevier.com/european-journal-of-pharmaceutics-and-biopharmaceutics

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 11.4
Content Distribution 59.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 11.4 13.4
Content Distribution 59.7 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

2013
Lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles as a new generation therapeutic delivery platform: a review.
Hadinoto, Kunn;Sundaresan, Ajitha;Cheow, Wean Sin;
Vol. 85 , No. 3 Pt A , pp. 427-43
767 views DOI Abstract
2019
In vivo models and decision trees for formulation development in early drug development: A review of current practices and recommendations for biopharmaceutical development.
Zane, P;Gieschen, H;Kersten, E;Mathias, N;Ollier, C;Johansson, P;Van den Bergh, A;Van Hemelryck, S;Reichel, A;Rotgeri, A;Schäfer, K;Müllertz, A;Langguth, P;
Vol. 142 , pp. 222-231
530 views DOI Abstract
2020
Preclinical evaluation of new formulation concepts for abiraterone acetate bioavailability enhancement based on the inhibition of pH-induced precipitation.
Boleslavská, Tereza;Světlík, Svatopluk;Žvátora, Pavel;Bosák, Jan;Dammer, Ondřej;Beránek, Josef;Kozlík, Petr;Křížek, Tomáš;Kutinová Canová, Nikolina;Šíma, Martin;Slanař, Ondřej;Štěpánek, František;
419 views DOI Abstract
2019
Verapamil delivery systems on the basis of mesoporous ZSM-5/KIT-6 and ZSM-5/SBA-15 polymer nanocomposites as a potential tool to overcome MDR in cancer cells.
Popova, Margarita;Mihaylova, Rositsa;Momekov, Georgi;Momekova, Denitsa;Lazarova, Hristina;Trendafilova, Ivalina;Mitova, Violeta;Koseva, Neli;Mihályi, Judith;Shestakova, Pavletta;St Petkov, Petko;Aleksandrov, Hristiyan A;Vayssilov, Georgi N;Konstantinov, Spiro;Szegedi, Ágnes;
410 views DOI Abstract
2016
NIR hyperspectral imaging to evaluate degradation in captopril commercial tablets.
França, Leandro de Moura;Pimentel, Maria Fernanda;Simões, Simone da Silva;Grangeiro, Severino;Prats-Montalbán, José M;Ferrer, Alberto;
Vol. 104 , pp. 180-8
401 views DOI Abstract
2018
Microfluidic self-assembly of a combinatorial library of single- and dual-ligand liposomes for in vitro and in vivo tumor targeting.
Ran, Rui;Wang, Haofei;Liu, Yun;Hui, Yue;Sun, Qi;Seth, Arjun;Wibowo, David;Chen, Dong;Zhao, Chun-Xia;
Vol. 130 , pp. 1-10
365 views DOI Abstract
2020
Progress and perspectives of brain-targeting lipid-based nanosystems via the nasal route in Alzheimer's disease.
Akel, Hussein;Ismail, Ruba;Csóka, Ildikó;
337 views DOI Abstract
2019
Characterization of spray dried powders with nucleic acid-containing PEI nanoparticles.
Keil, Tobias W M;Feldmann, Daniel P;Costabile, Gabriella;Zhong, Qian;da Rocha, Sandro;Merkel, Olivia M;
333 views DOI Abstract
2019
A unified in vitro test system for the assessment of tight junction modulators.
Saaber, Daniel;Reichl, Stephan;
Vol. 142 , pp. 353-363
314 views DOI Abstract
2013
crítica a la enseñanza de estudios sociales desde los proyectos interdisciplinarios
;Robles Altamirano, Adriana Lourdes ; Valencia Medina, Elvia Marlene
Vol. 6 , No. 10 , pp. 20-24
265 views Abstract
2020
Preclinical evaluation of new formulation concepts for abiraterone acetate bioavailability enhancement based on the inhibition of pH-induced precipitation.
Boleslavská, Tereza;Světlík, Svatopluk;Žvátora, Pavel;Bosák, Jan;Dammer, Ondřej;Beránek, Josef;Kozlík, Petr;Křížek, Tomáš;Kutinová Canová, Nikolina;Šíma, Martin;Slanař, Ondřej;Štěpánek, František;
419 views DOI Abstract
2020
Progress and perspectives of brain-targeting lipid-based nanosystems via the nasal route in Alzheimer's disease.
Akel, Hussein;Ismail, Ruba;Csóka, Ildikó;
337 views DOI Abstract
2019
In vivo models and decision trees for formulation development in early drug development: A review of current practices and recommendations for biopharmaceutical development.
Zane, P;Gieschen, H;Kersten, E;Mathias, N;Ollier, C;Johansson, P;Van den Bergh, A;Van Hemelryck, S;Reichel, A;Rotgeri, A;Schäfer, K;Müllertz, A;Langguth, P;
Vol. 142 , pp. 222-231
530 views DOI Abstract
2019
Characterization of spray dried powders with nucleic acid-containing PEI nanoparticles.
Keil, Tobias W M;Feldmann, Daniel P;Costabile, Gabriella;Zhong, Qian;da Rocha, Sandro;Merkel, Olivia M;
333 views DOI Abstract
2019
A unified in vitro test system for the assessment of tight junction modulators.
Saaber, Daniel;Reichl, Stephan;
Vol. 142 , pp. 353-363
314 views DOI Abstract
2019
Verapamil delivery systems on the basis of mesoporous ZSM-5/KIT-6 and ZSM-5/SBA-15 polymer nanocomposites as a potential tool to overcome MDR in cancer cells.
Popova, Margarita;Mihaylova, Rositsa;Momekov, Georgi;Momekova, Denitsa;Lazarova, Hristina;Trendafilova, Ivalina;Mitova, Violeta;Koseva, Neli;Mihályi, Judith;Shestakova, Pavletta;St Petkov, Petko;Aleksandrov, Hristiyan A;Vayssilov, Georgi N;Konstantinov, Spiro;Szegedi, Ágnes;
410 views DOI Abstract
2018
Microfluidic self-assembly of a combinatorial library of single- and dual-ligand liposomes for in vitro and in vivo tumor targeting.
Ran, Rui;Wang, Haofei;Liu, Yun;Hui, Yue;Sun, Qi;Seth, Arjun;Wibowo, David;Chen, Dong;Zhao, Chun-Xia;
Vol. 130 , pp. 1-10
365 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluación del estado nutricional de adolescentes en una unidad educativa de ecuador
;Sánchez-Mata, Marlene;Alejandro-Morales, Silvia;Bastidas-Vaca, Carlos;Jara-Castro, María
Vol. 10 , No. 25 , pp. 01-12
179 views Abstract
2016
toxoplasma gondii en mujeres embarazadas en la provincia de el oro, 2014
; Lam-Vivanco, Adriana;Segura-Osorio, Marisela;Santos-Luna, Jovanny;Sanmartín-Galvan, Diana;López-Bravo, Marcelo
Vol. 9 , No. 21 , pp. 135-141
186 views Abstract
2016
NIR hyperspectral imaging to evaluate degradation in captopril commercial tablets.
França, Leandro de Moura;Pimentel, Maria Fernanda;Simões, Simone da Silva;Grangeiro, Severino;Prats-Montalbán, José M;Ferrer, Alberto;
Vol. 104 , pp. 180-8
401 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,602 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

11.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

59.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.