journal of materials processing technology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3404 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

journal of materials processing technology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name journal of materials processing technology
Abbreviated Name journal of materials processing technology
ISSN 0924-0136
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-materials-processing-technology
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (134 total)

2011
conventional and molecular characterization of coagulase-negative staphylococcus in hospital isolates
;Poonam Sharma;Kunal K Lahiri;Ketoki Kapila
Vol. 54 , No. 1 , pp. 85-89
591 views DOI Abstract
2012
viral markers in patients with hemophagocytosis: a prospective study in a tertiary care hospital
;Baijayantimala Mishra;Neelam Varma;Suma Appannanavar;Pankaj Malhotra;Mrinalini Sharma;Anil Bhatnagar;Radha Kanta Ratho;Subhash Varma
Vol. 55 , No. 2 , pp. 215-217
486 views DOI Abstract
2012
peripheral t-cell lymphoma: frequency and distribution in a tertiary referral center in south india
;Deepak K Burad;Manipadam M Therese;Sheila Nair
Vol. 55 , No. 4 , pp. 429-432
477 views DOI Abstract
2014
periodontal pathogens in atheromatous plaque
;Saroj K. Rath;Manish Mukherjee;R Kaushik;Sourav Sen;Mukesh Kumar
Vol. 57 , No. 2 , pp. 259-264
442 views DOI Abstract
2017
ameloblastoma: a 16-year clinicopathological study on goan population
;Karla Maria Carvalho;Anita Dhupar;Anita Spadigam;Shaheen Syed
Vol. 60 , No. 2 , pp. 157-160
362 views DOI Abstract
2016
concomitant occurrence of multiple myeloma with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma
;Subhashis Mitra;Sanghamitra Mukherjee;Jay Mehta;Maitreyee Bhattacharyya;Hema Chakraborty
Vol. 59 , No. 3 , pp. 427-428
307 views DOI
2020
Applying the ultrasonic vibration during TIG welding as a promising approach for the development of nanoparticle dispersion strengthened aluminum weldments
M. Fattahi,A. Ghaheri,N. Arabian,F. Amirkhanlu,Hossein Moayedi;M. Fattahi;A. Ghaheri;N. Arabian;F. Amirkhanlu;Hossein Moayedi;
Vol. 282 , pp. 116672-
298 views DOI
2009
a comparative study of cervical smears in an urban hospital in india and a population-based screening program in mauritius
;Mulay Kaustubh;Swain Meenakshi;Patra Sushma;Gowrishankar Swarnalata
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 34-37
298 views Abstract
2020
Construction of three-dimensional extrusion limit diagram for magnesium alloy using artificial neural network and its validation
Bai, S.
Vol. 275 , pp. 0-0
295 views DOI
2020
Analysis of effects of process factors on corrosion resistance of adhesive bonded joints for aluminum alloys
Park, S.
Vol. 276 , pp. 0-0
294 views DOI
View All 134 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.