Indexed in Journament

journal of materials processing technology

ISSN 0924-0136· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #9,236 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
134 Articles
Scores higher than 68.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of materials processing technology
Abbreviated Name journal of materials processing technology
ISSN 0924-0136
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-materials-processing-technology

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity 55.6 28.2
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 3.6 11.5
Content Distribution 69.9 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (134)

2011
conventional and molecular characterization of coagulase-negative staphylococcus in hospital isolates
;Poonam Sharma;Kunal K Lahiri;Ketoki Kapila
Vol. 54 , No. 1 , pp. 85-89
639 views DOI Abstract
2012
viral markers in patients with hemophagocytosis: a prospective study in a tertiary care hospital
;Baijayantimala Mishra;Neelam Varma;Suma Appannanavar;Pankaj Malhotra;Mrinalini Sharma;Anil Bhatnagar;Radha Kanta Ratho;Subhash Varma
Vol. 55 , No. 2 , pp. 215-217
517 views DOI Abstract
2012
peripheral t-cell lymphoma: frequency and distribution in a tertiary referral center in south india
;Deepak K Burad;Manipadam M Therese;Sheila Nair
Vol. 55 , No. 4 , pp. 429-432
505 views DOI Abstract
2014
periodontal pathogens in atheromatous plaque
;Saroj K. Rath;Manish Mukherjee;R Kaushik;Sourav Sen;Mukesh Kumar
Vol. 57 , No. 2 , pp. 259-264
474 views DOI Abstract
2017
ameloblastoma: a 16-year clinicopathological study on goan population
;Karla Maria Carvalho;Anita Dhupar;Anita Spadigam;Shaheen Syed
Vol. 60 , No. 2 , pp. 157-160
398 views DOI Abstract
2016
concomitant occurrence of multiple myeloma with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma
;Subhashis Mitra;Sanghamitra Mukherjee;Jay Mehta;Maitreyee Bhattacharyya;Hema Chakraborty
Vol. 59 , No. 3 , pp. 427-428
338 views DOI
2020
Applying the ultrasonic vibration during TIG welding as a promising approach for the development of nanoparticle dispersion strengthened aluminum weldments
M. Fattahi,A. Ghaheri,N. Arabian,F. Amirkhanlu,Hossein Moayedi;M. Fattahi;A. Ghaheri;N. Arabian;F. Amirkhanlu;Hossein Moayedi;
Vol. 282 , pp. 116672-
329 views DOI
2020
Construction of three-dimensional extrusion limit diagram for magnesium alloy using artificial neural network and its validation
Bai, S.
Vol. 275 , pp. 0-0
325 views DOI
2009
a comparative study of cervical smears in an urban hospital in india and a population-based screening program in mauritius
;Mulay Kaustubh;Swain Meenakshi;Patra Sushma;Gowrishankar Swarnalata
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 34-37
319 views Abstract
2020
Analysis of effects of process factors on corrosion resistance of adhesive bonded joints for aluminum alloys
Park, S.
Vol. 276 , pp. 0-0
318 views DOI
2020
Applying the ultrasonic vibration during TIG welding as a promising approach for the development of nanoparticle dispersion strengthened aluminum weldments
M. Fattahi,A. Ghaheri,N. Arabian,F. Amirkhanlu,Hossein Moayedi;M. Fattahi;A. Ghaheri;N. Arabian;F. Amirkhanlu;Hossein Moayedi;
Vol. 282 , pp. 116672-
329 views DOI
2020
Correlation between gas-dynamic behaviour of a vapour plume and oscillation of keyhole size during laser welding of 5083 Al-alloy
Huang, Y.
Vol. 283 , pp. 0-0
192 views DOI
2020
Organic adhesive assisted underwater submerged-arc welding
Dong, S.
Vol. 284 , pp. 0-0
155 views DOI
2020
Pin plunging reinforced refill friction stir spot welding of Alclad 2219 to 7075 alloy
Cao, J.Y.
Vol. 284 , pp. 0-0
167 views DOI
2020
Penetration state identification of lap joints in gas tungsten arc welding process based on two channel arc sounds
Gao, Y.
Vol. 285 , pp. 0-0
194 views DOI
2020
Evaluation of μFSBR joint performance by process-physics based quality criteria and online monitoring algorithm
Khan, H.
Vol. 278 , pp. 0-0
110 views DOI
2020
Evaluation of strength of stainless steel bolt without heat treatment considering Bauschinger effect during manufacturing process
Narita, S.
Vol. 278 , pp. 0-0
207 views DOI
2020
Manufacturing of thin-walled Ni-based superalloy castings using alternative thermal insulating module to control solidification
Szeliga, D.
Vol. 278 , pp. 0-0
191 views DOI
2020
Development of an aluminum compound casting process - Experiments and numerical simulations
Heugenhauser, S.
Vol. 279 , pp. 0-0
185 views DOI
2020
Criterion for predicting expulsion in resistance spot welding of steel sheets
Valaee-Tale, M.
Vol. 275 , pp. 0-0
186 views DOI
Journament Score
37.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #9,236 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.