nonlinear analysis: real world applications | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4029 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

nonlinear analysis: real world applications

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name nonlinear analysis: real world applications
Abbreviated Name nonlinear analysis: real world applications
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (186 total)

2017
renal-targeted delivery of triptolide by entrapment in pegylated trx-20-modified liposomes
;Yuan Z;Jia L;Lim LY;Lin J;Shu G;Zhao L;Ye G;Liang X;Ji H;Fu H
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 5673-5686
667 views Abstract
2017
a review of drug delivery systems based on nanotechnology and green chemistry: green nanomedicine
;Jahangirian H;Lemraski EG;Webster TJ;Rafiee-Moghaddam R;Abdollahi Y
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 2957-2978
386 views Abstract
2017
effective use of nanocarriers as drug delivery systems for the treatment of selected tumors
;Din FU;Aman W;Ullah I;Qureshi OS;Mustapha O;Shafique S;Zeb A
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 7291-7309
349 views Abstract
2020
Global boundedness of weak solution in an attraction–repulsion chemotaxis system with p-Laplacian diffusion
Li, Y.
Vol. 51 , pp. 0-0
348 views DOI
2016
styrene maleic acid-encapsulated paclitaxel micelles: antitumor activity and toxicity studies following oral administration in a murine orthotopic colon cancer model
;Parayath NN;Nehoff H;Norton SE;Highton AJ;Taurin S;Kemp RA;Greish K
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 3979-3991
337 views Abstract
2017
mn2+-coordinated pda@dox/plga nanoparticles as a smart theranostic agent for synergistic chemo-photothermal tumor therapy
;Xi J;Da L;Yang C;Chen R;Gao L;Fan L;Han J
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 3331-3345
307 views Abstract
2016
self-assembling peptide nanofibers containing phenylalanine for the controlled release of 5-fluorouracil
;Ashwanikumar N;Kumar NA;Saneesh Babu PS;Sivakumar KC;Vadakkan MV;Nair P;Hema Saranya I;Asha Nair S;Vinod Kumar GS
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 5583-5594
302 views Abstract
2017
polymeric mixed micelles loaded mitoxantrone for overcoming multidrug resistance in breast cancer via photodynamic therapy
;Li ZY;Cai Y;Zhao YQ;Yu H;Zhou HY;Chen MW
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 6595-6604
297 views Abstract
2017
fabrication and in vitro/in vivo evaluation of amorphous andrographolide nanosuspensions stabilized by d-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate/sodium lauryl sulfate
;Qiao H;Chen L;Rui T;Wang J;Chen T;Fu T;Li J;Di L
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 1033-1046
292 views Abstract
2011
nano-zinc oxide damages spatial cognition capability via over-enhanced long-term potentiation in hippocamus of wistar rats
;Han D;Tian Y;Zhang T;Ren G;Yang Z
Vol. 2011 , No. default , pp. 1453-1461
292 views Abstract
View All 186 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.