Indexed in Journament

fertility and sterility

ISSN 1556-5653· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
26.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,899 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
98 Articles
Scores higher than 11.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name fertil steril
Abbreviated Name fertil steril
ISSN 1556-5653
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/fertility-and-sterility

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for fertility and sterility
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 4.3 7.8
Content Distribution 52.5 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (98)

2012
Consensus on women's health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): the Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group
Vol. 97 , No. 1 , pp. -
570 views Abstract
1998
Pituitary desensitization to gonadotropin-releasing hormone increases abdominal adiposity in hyperandrogenic anovulatory women
Vol. 70 , No. 1 , pp. -
553 views Abstract
2019
Reprint of: Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study across ten countries.
Vol. 112 , No. 4S1 , pp. e137-e152
478 views DOI
2002
Ovarian hyperandrogenism in adult female rhesus monkeys exposed to prenatal androgen excess
Vol. 77 , No. 1 , pp. -
476 views Abstract
1997
2019
Artificial intelligence: its applications in reproductive medicine and the assisted reproductive technologies.
Vol. 112 , No. 1 , pp. 28-30
414 views DOI
2012
Adipose tissue insulin resistance in peripubertal girls with first-degree family history of polycystic ovary syndrome
Vol. 98 , No. 6 , pp. -
397 views Abstract
2019
25 historic papers: an ASRM 75th birthday gift from Fertility and Sterility.
Vol. 112 , No. 4S1 , pp. e2-e27
383 views DOI
2020
Levothyroxine and thyroid peroxidase antibodies in women with recurrent pregnancy loss.
Vol. 113 , No. 3 , pp. 546
381 views DOI
2020
How vitamin D level influences in vitro fertilization outcomes: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
290 views DOI Abstract
2020
Levothyroxine and thyroid peroxidase antibodies in women with recurrent pregnancy loss.
Vol. 113 , No. 3 , pp. 546
381 views DOI
2020
Comparison of pregnancy outcomes following intrauterine insemination in young women with decreased versus normal ovarian reserve.
Vol. 113 , No. 4 , pp. 788-796.e4
295 views DOI Abstract
2020
Optimizing ovarian tissue quality before cryopreservation: comparing outcomes of three decortication methods on stromal and follicular viability.
Vol. 113 , No. 3 , pp. 609-617.e3
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
25 historic papers: an ASRM 75th birthday gift from Fertility and Sterility.
Vol. 112 , No. 4S1 , pp. e2-e27
383 views DOI
2019
Reprint of: Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study across ten countries.
Vol. 112 , No. 4S1 , pp. e137-e152
478 views DOI
2019
Association between M2/ANXA5 haplotype and repeated pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis.
Vol. 111 , No. 5 , pp. 971-981.e2
288 views DOI Abstract
2019
Embryonic cell-free DNA versus trophectoderm biopsy for aneuploidy testing: concordance rate and clinical implications.
Vol. 112 , No. 3 , pp. 510-519
339 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
26.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,899 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

26.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

52.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.