Indexed in Journament

European journal of radiology

ISSN 1872-7727· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,412 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
26 Articles
Scores higher than 81.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Eur J Radiol
Abbreviated Name eur j radiol
ISSN 1872-7727
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/european-journal-of-radiology

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 20.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 72.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 20.0 9.2
Diversity — 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 9.3 7.8
Content Distribution 72.9 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (26)

2013
Evaluation of medial meniscus tears and meniscal stability: weight-bearing MRI vs arthroscopy.
Barile, Antonio;Conti, Laura;Lanni, Giuseppe;Calvisi, Vittorio;Masciocchi, Carlo;
Vol. 82 , No. 4 , pp. 633-9
416 views DOI Abstract
2019
7T TOF-MRA shows modulated orifices of lenticulostriate arteries associated with atherosclerotic plaques in patients with lacunar infarcts.
Kong, Qingle;Zhang, Zihao;Yang, Qi;Fan, Zhaoyang;Wang, Bo;An, Jing;Zhuo, Yan;
Vol. 118 , pp. 271-276
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exploring breast cancer response prediction to neoadjuvant systemic therapy using MRI-based radiomics: A systematic review.
Granzier, R W Y;van Nijnatten, T J A;Woodruff, H C;Smidt, M L;Lobbes, M B I;
Vol. 121 , pp. 108736
390 views DOI Abstract
2020
Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules Using Deep Learning Radiomics of Thyroid Ultrasound Images.
Zhou, Hui;Jin, Yinhua;Dai, Lei;Zhang, Meiwu;Qiu, Yuqin;Wang, Kun;Tian, Jie;Zheng, Jianjun;
Vol. 127 , pp. 108992
389 views DOI Abstract
2011
CT colonography: role of a second reader CAD paradigm in the initial training of radiologists.
Neri, Emanuele;Faggioni, Lorenzo;Regge, Daniele;Vagli, Paola;Turini, Francesca;Cerri, Francesca;Picano, Eugenia;Giusti, Sabina;Bartolozzi, Carlo;
Vol. 80 , No. 2 , pp. 303-9
387 views DOI Abstract
2003
MRI findings in Tolosa-Hunt syndrome before and after systemic corticosteroid therapy
Cakirer S;;
Vol. 45 , No. 2 , pp. -
355 views Abstract
2019
Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) for response assessment in patients with osteosarcoma undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Baidya Kayal, Esha;Kandasamy, Devasenathipathy;Khare, Kedar;Bakhshi, Sameer;Sharma, Raju;Mehndiratta, Amit;
Vol. 119 , pp. 108635
330 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multi-b-value diffusion weighted imaging for preoperative evaluation of risk stratification in early-stage endometrial cancer.
Zhang, Qi;Yu, Xiaoduo;Lin, Meng;Xie, Lizhi;Zhang, Miaomiao;Ouyang, Han;Zhao, Xinming;
Vol. 119 , pp. 108637
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
Screening mammography beyond breast cancer: breast arterial calcifications as a sex-specific biomarker of cardiovascular risk.
Trimboli, Rubina Manuela;Codari, Marina;Guazzi, Marco;Sardanelli, Francesco;
Vol. 119 , pp. 108636
325 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prediction of molecular subtypes of breast cancer using BI-RADS features based on a “white box” machine learning approach in a multi-modal imaging setting
Wu, M.
Vol. 114 , pp. 175-184
323 views DOI
2023
Eye tracking validation: Improving radiologist reporting and interpretation.
Roshan, Mona P;Garcia, Jacklyn;Cury, Ana B;Lamy, Chrisnel;Souza, Frederico;Sidani, Charif;Cury, Ricardo C;
Vol. 168 , pp. 111134
161 views DOI Abstract
2020
Development and clinical implementation of tailored image analysis tools for COVID-19 in the midst of the pandemic: The synergetic effect of an open, clinically embedded software development platform and machine learning.
Anastasopoulos, Constantin;Weikert, Thomas;Yang, Shan;Abdulkadir, Ahmed;Schmülling, Lena;Bühler, Claudia;Paciolla, Fabiano;Sexauer, Raphael;Cyriac, Joshy;Nesic, Ivan;Twerenbold, Raphael;Bremerich, Jens;Stieltjes, Bram;Sauter, Alexander W;Sommer, Gregor;
Vol. 131 , pp. 109233
294 views DOI Abstract
2020
Radiology department strategies to protect radiologic technologists against COVID19: Experience from Wuhan
Zhao, Y.
Vol. 127 , pp. 0-0
204 views DOI
2020
Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules Using Deep Learning Radiomics of Thyroid Ultrasound Images.
Zhou, Hui;Jin, Yinhua;Dai, Lei;Zhang, Meiwu;Qiu, Yuqin;Wang, Kun;Tian, Jie;Zheng, Jianjun;
Vol. 127 , pp. 108992
389 views DOI Abstract
2020
High-resolution computed tomography manifestations of COVID-19 infections in patients of different ages
Chen, Z.
Vol. 126 , pp. 0-0
159 views DOI
2020
Diagnosis of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): rRT-PCR or CT?
Long, C.
Vol. 126 , pp. 0-0
191 views DOI
2020
CT Halo sign: A systematic review.
Ray, Animesh;Mittal, Ankit;Vyas, Surabhi;
Vol. 124 , pp. 108843
284 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prediction of molecular subtypes of breast cancer using BI-RADS features based on a “white box” machine learning approach in a multi-modal imaging setting
Wu, M.
Vol. 114 , pp. 175-184
323 views DOI
2019
Artificial intelligence applications for thoracic imaging.
Chassagnon, Guillaume;Vakalopoulou, Maria;Paragios, Nikos;Revel, Marie-Pierre;
Vol. 123 , pp. 108774
231 views DOI Abstract
2019
Exploring breast cancer response prediction to neoadjuvant systemic therapy using MRI-based radiomics: A systematic review.
Granzier, R W Y;van Nijnatten, T J A;Woodruff, H C;Smidt, M L;Lobbes, M B I;
Vol. 121 , pp. 108736
390 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,412 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

72.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.